Selection and Socialization Influences on Adolescent Alcohol Use

The Individual and Joint Contexts of Neighborhood Disadvantage and Population Density

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) and population density (PD) are two community characteristics contextualizing friends’ influence on adolescent alcohol use. However, these community characteristics are rarely examined for potential joint contributions, although it is possible that the way friends are selected or influence alcohol use are shaped by both ND and PD. In addition, prior studies examining ND or PD contexts on friend influence rarely discern between socialization and selection. Objectives: The current study examined how selection and socialization influences on adolescent alcohol use are shaped by unique and joint contexts of ND and PD. Methods: Adolescents from Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent and Adult Health (Add Health) were included in three models assessing friends’ socialization of alcohol us initiation and binge drinking, and selection of drinking friends. ND and PD were tested for mediation and moderation individually and jointly. Results: Results indicated that socialization of drinking initiation was stronger in high ND contexts, and that continued binge drinking was stronger in low ND contexts. PD indirectly influenced socialization of initiation and binge drinking maintenance via a negative association with number of drinking friends. PD and ND jointly influenced the association between initial binge drinking and next-year selection of drinking friends, such that selection was stronger within areas related to lower levels of drinking friends. Conclusions/Importance: Current results indicate that PD and ND shape friends’ influence on alcohol use in unique ways. These must be accounted for to better understand bidirectional effects of friend influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1663-1678
Number of pages16
JournalSubstance Use and Misuse
Volume54
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 24 2019

Fingerprint

Socialization
population density
Population Density
socialization
Joints
alcohol
adolescent
Binge Drinking
Drinking
Alcohols
Underage Drinking
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
community
mediation
longitudinal study
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • adolescence
  • neighborhood
  • peer influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{6179e5b333104281bd06e3f20f24d9bb,
title = "Selection and Socialization Influences on Adolescent Alcohol Use: The Individual and Joint Contexts of Neighborhood Disadvantage and Population Density",
abstract = "Background: Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) and population density (PD) are two community characteristics contextualizing friends’ influence on adolescent alcohol use. However, these community characteristics are rarely examined for potential joint contributions, although it is possible that the way friends are selected or influence alcohol use are shaped by both ND and PD. In addition, prior studies examining ND or PD contexts on friend influence rarely discern between socialization and selection. Objectives: The current study examined how selection and socialization influences on adolescent alcohol use are shaped by unique and joint contexts of ND and PD. Methods: Adolescents from Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent and Adult Health (Add Health) were included in three models assessing friends’ socialization of alcohol us initiation and binge drinking, and selection of drinking friends. ND and PD were tested for mediation and moderation individually and jointly. Results: Results indicated that socialization of drinking initiation was stronger in high ND contexts, and that continued binge drinking was stronger in low ND contexts. PD indirectly influenced socialization of initiation and binge drinking maintenance via a negative association with number of drinking friends. PD and ND jointly influenced the association between initial binge drinking and next-year selection of drinking friends, such that selection was stronger within areas related to lower levels of drinking friends. Conclusions/Importance: Current results indicate that PD and ND shape friends’ influence on alcohol use in unique ways. These must be accounted for to better understand bidirectional effects of friend influence.",
keywords = "Alcohol, adolescence, neighborhood, peer influence",
author = "Deutsch, {Arielle R}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/10826084.2019.1608247",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1663--1678",
journal = "Substance Use and Misuse",
issn = "1082-6084",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection and Socialization Influences on Adolescent Alcohol Use

T2 - The Individual and Joint Contexts of Neighborhood Disadvantage and Population Density

AU - Deutsch, Arielle R

PY - 2019/8/24

Y1 - 2019/8/24

N2 - Background: Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) and population density (PD) are two community characteristics contextualizing friends’ influence on adolescent alcohol use. However, these community characteristics are rarely examined for potential joint contributions, although it is possible that the way friends are selected or influence alcohol use are shaped by both ND and PD. In addition, prior studies examining ND or PD contexts on friend influence rarely discern between socialization and selection. Objectives: The current study examined how selection and socialization influences on adolescent alcohol use are shaped by unique and joint contexts of ND and PD. Methods: Adolescents from Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent and Adult Health (Add Health) were included in three models assessing friends’ socialization of alcohol us initiation and binge drinking, and selection of drinking friends. ND and PD were tested for mediation and moderation individually and jointly. Results: Results indicated that socialization of drinking initiation was stronger in high ND contexts, and that continued binge drinking was stronger in low ND contexts. PD indirectly influenced socialization of initiation and binge drinking maintenance via a negative association with number of drinking friends. PD and ND jointly influenced the association between initial binge drinking and next-year selection of drinking friends, such that selection was stronger within areas related to lower levels of drinking friends. Conclusions/Importance: Current results indicate that PD and ND shape friends’ influence on alcohol use in unique ways. These must be accounted for to better understand bidirectional effects of friend influence.

AB - Background: Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) and population density (PD) are two community characteristics contextualizing friends’ influence on adolescent alcohol use. However, these community characteristics are rarely examined for potential joint contributions, although it is possible that the way friends are selected or influence alcohol use are shaped by both ND and PD. In addition, prior studies examining ND or PD contexts on friend influence rarely discern between socialization and selection. Objectives: The current study examined how selection and socialization influences on adolescent alcohol use are shaped by unique and joint contexts of ND and PD. Methods: Adolescents from Waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent and Adult Health (Add Health) were included in three models assessing friends’ socialization of alcohol us initiation and binge drinking, and selection of drinking friends. ND and PD were tested for mediation and moderation individually and jointly. Results: Results indicated that socialization of drinking initiation was stronger in high ND contexts, and that continued binge drinking was stronger in low ND contexts. PD indirectly influenced socialization of initiation and binge drinking maintenance via a negative association with number of drinking friends. PD and ND jointly influenced the association between initial binge drinking and next-year selection of drinking friends, such that selection was stronger within areas related to lower levels of drinking friends. Conclusions/Importance: Current results indicate that PD and ND shape friends’ influence on alcohol use in unique ways. These must be accounted for to better understand bidirectional effects of friend influence.

KW - Alcohol

KW - adolescence

KW - neighborhood

KW - peer influence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065330949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065330949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10826084.2019.1608247

DO - 10.1080/10826084.2019.1608247

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 1663

EP - 1678

JO - Substance Use and Misuse

JF - Substance Use and Misuse

SN - 1082-6084

IS - 10

ER -