Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue

Ready for implementation to practice?

Ann Malone Berger, Sandra A. Mitchell, Paul B. Jacobsen, William F. Pirl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-211
Number of pages22
JournalCA Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Fatigue
Neoplasms
Oncology Nursing
Nursing Societies
Organizations
Self Report
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • cancer-related fatigue
  • evidence-based interventions
  • multidisciplinary management
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue : Ready for implementation to practice? / Berger, Ann Malone; Mitchell, Sandra A.; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Pirl, William F.

In: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 65, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 190-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berger, Ann Malone ; Mitchell, Sandra A. ; Jacobsen, Paul B. ; Pirl, William F. / Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue : Ready for implementation to practice?. In: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015 ; Vol. 65, No. 3. pp. 190-211.
@article{4461dfd8d7fa473d933f25cbeec178d0,
title = "Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue: Ready for implementation to practice?",
abstract = "Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.",
keywords = "cancer-related fatigue, evidence-based interventions, multidisciplinary management, patient-reported outcomes, screening",
author = "Berger, {Ann Malone} and Mitchell, {Sandra A.} and Jacobsen, {Paul B.} and Pirl, {William F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3322/caac.21268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "190--211",
journal = "CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians",
issn = "0007-9235",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue

T2 - Ready for implementation to practice?

AU - Berger, Ann Malone

AU - Mitchell, Sandra A.

AU - Jacobsen, Paul B.

AU - Pirl, William F.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.

AB - Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.

KW - cancer-related fatigue

KW - evidence-based interventions

KW - multidisciplinary management

KW - patient-reported outcomes

KW - screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929133898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929133898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3322/caac.21268

DO - 10.3322/caac.21268

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 190

EP - 211

JO - CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

JF - CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

SN - 0007-9235

IS - 3

ER -