School-wide discipline and the intransigency of exclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

School-wide discipline programs have existed for over 60. years. A commonality among most school-wide discipline programs is the use of exclusionary practices. Some programs use exclusions as a last resort while others use them as a first-line strategy. The exclusionary aspects of discipline programs became more popular in the 1990s with increasing school violence and Zero Tolerance. However, exclusionary practices such as suspensions and expulsions are often administered idiosyncratically, unfairly, and in an increasingly peculiar fashion. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis and critique of school-wide discipline programs that employ exclusionary practices. Specifically, the research will be reviewed focusing both on the effectiveness of school-wide disciplinary programs and their impact on student and teacher behavior. Reasons for their widespread use will be proffered including the purposes and interests they serve for both teachers and administrators. Finally, recommendations for schools moving beyond the intransigency of exclusion and toward positive supports will be presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2094-2100
Number of pages7
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

exclusion
school
teachers' behavior
expulsion
Administrative Personnel
Violence
tolerance
Suspensions
violence
Students
teacher
Research
student

Keywords

  • Exclusion
  • School-wide discipline
  • Suspension and expulsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

School-wide discipline and the intransigency of exclusion. / Maag, John W.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 34, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 2094-2100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6b485fb7ebe440fb87b53e4035b1c6f,
title = "School-wide discipline and the intransigency of exclusion",
abstract = "School-wide discipline programs have existed for over 60. years. A commonality among most school-wide discipline programs is the use of exclusionary practices. Some programs use exclusions as a last resort while others use them as a first-line strategy. The exclusionary aspects of discipline programs became more popular in the 1990s with increasing school violence and Zero Tolerance. However, exclusionary practices such as suspensions and expulsions are often administered idiosyncratically, unfairly, and in an increasingly peculiar fashion. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis and critique of school-wide discipline programs that employ exclusionary practices. Specifically, the research will be reviewed focusing both on the effectiveness of school-wide disciplinary programs and their impact on student and teacher behavior. Reasons for their widespread use will be proffered including the purposes and interests they serve for both teachers and administrators. Finally, recommendations for schools moving beyond the intransigency of exclusion and toward positive supports will be presented.",
keywords = "Exclusion, School-wide discipline, Suspension and expulsion",
author = "Maag, {John W}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "2094--2100",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - School-wide discipline and the intransigency of exclusion

AU - Maag, John W

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - School-wide discipline programs have existed for over 60. years. A commonality among most school-wide discipline programs is the use of exclusionary practices. Some programs use exclusions as a last resort while others use them as a first-line strategy. The exclusionary aspects of discipline programs became more popular in the 1990s with increasing school violence and Zero Tolerance. However, exclusionary practices such as suspensions and expulsions are often administered idiosyncratically, unfairly, and in an increasingly peculiar fashion. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis and critique of school-wide discipline programs that employ exclusionary practices. Specifically, the research will be reviewed focusing both on the effectiveness of school-wide disciplinary programs and their impact on student and teacher behavior. Reasons for their widespread use will be proffered including the purposes and interests they serve for both teachers and administrators. Finally, recommendations for schools moving beyond the intransigency of exclusion and toward positive supports will be presented.

AB - School-wide discipline programs have existed for over 60. years. A commonality among most school-wide discipline programs is the use of exclusionary practices. Some programs use exclusions as a last resort while others use them as a first-line strategy. The exclusionary aspects of discipline programs became more popular in the 1990s with increasing school violence and Zero Tolerance. However, exclusionary practices such as suspensions and expulsions are often administered idiosyncratically, unfairly, and in an increasingly peculiar fashion. The purpose of this article is to provide an analysis and critique of school-wide discipline programs that employ exclusionary practices. Specifically, the research will be reviewed focusing both on the effectiveness of school-wide disciplinary programs and their impact on student and teacher behavior. Reasons for their widespread use will be proffered including the purposes and interests they serve for both teachers and administrators. Finally, recommendations for schools moving beyond the intransigency of exclusion and toward positive supports will be presented.

KW - Exclusion

KW - School-wide discipline

KW - Suspension and expulsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865143831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865143831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.005

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 2094

EP - 2100

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

IS - 10

ER -