Scholarly productivity

A survey of nursing faculty researchers

Mary Erickson Megel, Nancy F. Langston, John W Creswell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The scholarly productivity, and factors associated with it, of leading nurse researchers at NLN-accredited schools of nursing was examined. The sample consisted of 148 doctorally prepared nurse researchers who were identified as leading researchers by their respective deans. To assess the impact of three sets of factors (cumulative advantage, psychological/individual, and reinforcement) on research articles published in the last three years, the 96 tenured respondents were subdivided into four groups on the basis of the number of research publications reported. One-way analysis of variance showed that the highest producers (eight or more published research articles) were motivated by peer pressure outside their institution, as well as by research team members, and displayed a greater preference for conducting and writing research than nonproducers (no published research in the last three years). High producers coauthored papers with mentors in graduate school, spent less time in teaching and more in administration, and tended to publish more before their doctorate than nonproducers. These results were descriptively compared with correlates of publication productivity for faculty in other disciplines. Implications for administrators in nursing schools include encouraging faculty to establish research networks and supportive research teams, encouraging research and publishing at early stages of a faculty member's career, and adjusting teaching loads in order to provide time for research and writing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-54
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Professional Nursing
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Nursing Faculties
Research Personnel
Efficiency
Research
Publications
Teaching
Nurses
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nursing Schools
School Nursing
Mentors
Administrative Personnel
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Faculty, research productivity
  • Research, faculty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Scholarly productivity : A survey of nursing faculty researchers. / Megel, Mary Erickson; Langston, Nancy F.; Creswell, John W.

In: Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 45-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Megel, Mary Erickson ; Langston, Nancy F. ; Creswell, John W. / Scholarly productivity : A survey of nursing faculty researchers. In: Journal of Professional Nursing. 1988 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 45-54.
@article{0c7a9de56e704d299d75f295c9a84c99,
title = "Scholarly productivity: A survey of nursing faculty researchers",
abstract = "The scholarly productivity, and factors associated with it, of leading nurse researchers at NLN-accredited schools of nursing was examined. The sample consisted of 148 doctorally prepared nurse researchers who were identified as leading researchers by their respective deans. To assess the impact of three sets of factors (cumulative advantage, psychological/individual, and reinforcement) on research articles published in the last three years, the 96 tenured respondents were subdivided into four groups on the basis of the number of research publications reported. One-way analysis of variance showed that the highest producers (eight or more published research articles) were motivated by peer pressure outside their institution, as well as by research team members, and displayed a greater preference for conducting and writing research than nonproducers (no published research in the last three years). High producers coauthored papers with mentors in graduate school, spent less time in teaching and more in administration, and tended to publish more before their doctorate than nonproducers. These results were descriptively compared with correlates of publication productivity for faculty in other disciplines. Implications for administrators in nursing schools include encouraging faculty to establish research networks and supportive research teams, encouraging research and publishing at early stages of a faculty member's career, and adjusting teaching loads in order to provide time for research and writing.",
keywords = "Faculty, research productivity, Research, faculty",
author = "Megel, {Mary Erickson} and Langston, {Nancy F.} and Creswell, {John W}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S8755-7223(88)80073-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "45--54",
journal = "Journal of Professional Nursing",
issn = "8755-7223",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholarly productivity

T2 - A survey of nursing faculty researchers

AU - Megel, Mary Erickson

AU - Langston, Nancy F.

AU - Creswell, John W

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The scholarly productivity, and factors associated with it, of leading nurse researchers at NLN-accredited schools of nursing was examined. The sample consisted of 148 doctorally prepared nurse researchers who were identified as leading researchers by their respective deans. To assess the impact of three sets of factors (cumulative advantage, psychological/individual, and reinforcement) on research articles published in the last three years, the 96 tenured respondents were subdivided into four groups on the basis of the number of research publications reported. One-way analysis of variance showed that the highest producers (eight or more published research articles) were motivated by peer pressure outside their institution, as well as by research team members, and displayed a greater preference for conducting and writing research than nonproducers (no published research in the last three years). High producers coauthored papers with mentors in graduate school, spent less time in teaching and more in administration, and tended to publish more before their doctorate than nonproducers. These results were descriptively compared with correlates of publication productivity for faculty in other disciplines. Implications for administrators in nursing schools include encouraging faculty to establish research networks and supportive research teams, encouraging research and publishing at early stages of a faculty member's career, and adjusting teaching loads in order to provide time for research and writing.

AB - The scholarly productivity, and factors associated with it, of leading nurse researchers at NLN-accredited schools of nursing was examined. The sample consisted of 148 doctorally prepared nurse researchers who were identified as leading researchers by their respective deans. To assess the impact of three sets of factors (cumulative advantage, psychological/individual, and reinforcement) on research articles published in the last three years, the 96 tenured respondents were subdivided into four groups on the basis of the number of research publications reported. One-way analysis of variance showed that the highest producers (eight or more published research articles) were motivated by peer pressure outside their institution, as well as by research team members, and displayed a greater preference for conducting and writing research than nonproducers (no published research in the last three years). High producers coauthored papers with mentors in graduate school, spent less time in teaching and more in administration, and tended to publish more before their doctorate than nonproducers. These results were descriptively compared with correlates of publication productivity for faculty in other disciplines. Implications for administrators in nursing schools include encouraging faculty to establish research networks and supportive research teams, encouraging research and publishing at early stages of a faculty member's career, and adjusting teaching loads in order to provide time for research and writing.

KW - Faculty, research productivity

KW - Research, faculty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023674632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023674632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S8755-7223(88)80073-5

DO - 10.1016/S8755-7223(88)80073-5

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 45

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Professional Nursing

JF - Journal of Professional Nursing

SN - 8755-7223

IS - 1

ER -