Safety performance of gloves using the pressure tolerance of the hand

A. Muralidhar, R. R. Bishu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two prototype gloves have been designed and developed at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety performance of the developed gloves. An experiment was conducted to assess the discomfort threshold level at 12 zones on the palmar surface of the hand for five hand conditions — bare hand, single glove, double glove and two prototype gloves. Prototype I consisted of a glove with an extra layer of glove material applied selectively to critical areas of the hand; while prototype II had up to four layers applied to critical areas. This design increases protection in critical areas without increasing bulk, provides performances comparable with single glove, and improves grip strength. The study was conducted using an algometer device to apply pressure to each of the 12 zones, for all hand conditions. The results indicated that for pressure tolerance, prototype II had the highest pressure-discomfort threshold, while prototype I had a threshold similar to the double layer glove. Pressure discomfort tolerance threshold is greatly increased by the use of gloves, and pressure— discomfort thresholds are raised by 25–65%. The two prototype gloves, although much less bulkier than the double glove, have pressure thresholds that are equal to or superior to that of a double glove. The algometer can be used to assess the safety of glove from mechanical trauma. Hence, the generalizability of the results is somewhat restricted. However, the method of selective protection, without compromising performance appears to be promising and is worth pursuing by glove designers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-572
Number of pages12
JournalErgonomics
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2000

Fingerprint

tolerance
Hand
Safety
Pressure
performance
trauma
experiment
Hand Strength
Equipment and Supplies
Wounds and Injuries
Experiments

Keywords

  • Algometer
  • Gloves
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Safety performance of gloves using the pressure tolerance of the hand. / Muralidhar, A.; Bishu, R. R.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 5, 01.05.2000, p. 561-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b9d9096582140c2b976ae351144319b,
title = "Safety performance of gloves using the pressure tolerance of the hand",
abstract = "Two prototype gloves have been designed and developed at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety performance of the developed gloves. An experiment was conducted to assess the discomfort threshold level at 12 zones on the palmar surface of the hand for five hand conditions — bare hand, single glove, double glove and two prototype gloves. Prototype I consisted of a glove with an extra layer of glove material applied selectively to critical areas of the hand; while prototype II had up to four layers applied to critical areas. This design increases protection in critical areas without increasing bulk, provides performances comparable with single glove, and improves grip strength. The study was conducted using an algometer device to apply pressure to each of the 12 zones, for all hand conditions. The results indicated that for pressure tolerance, prototype II had the highest pressure-discomfort threshold, while prototype I had a threshold similar to the double layer glove. Pressure discomfort tolerance threshold is greatly increased by the use of gloves, and pressure— discomfort thresholds are raised by 25–65{\%}. The two prototype gloves, although much less bulkier than the double glove, have pressure thresholds that are equal to or superior to that of a double glove. The algometer can be used to assess the safety of glove from mechanical trauma. Hence, the generalizability of the results is somewhat restricted. However, the method of selective protection, without compromising performance appears to be promising and is worth pursuing by glove designers.",
keywords = "Algometer, Gloves, Safety",
author = "A. Muralidhar and Bishu, {R. R.}",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/001401300184251",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "561--572",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety performance of gloves using the pressure tolerance of the hand

AU - Muralidhar, A.

AU - Bishu, R. R.

PY - 2000/5/1

Y1 - 2000/5/1

N2 - Two prototype gloves have been designed and developed at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety performance of the developed gloves. An experiment was conducted to assess the discomfort threshold level at 12 zones on the palmar surface of the hand for five hand conditions — bare hand, single glove, double glove and two prototype gloves. Prototype I consisted of a glove with an extra layer of glove material applied selectively to critical areas of the hand; while prototype II had up to four layers applied to critical areas. This design increases protection in critical areas without increasing bulk, provides performances comparable with single glove, and improves grip strength. The study was conducted using an algometer device to apply pressure to each of the 12 zones, for all hand conditions. The results indicated that for pressure tolerance, prototype II had the highest pressure-discomfort threshold, while prototype I had a threshold similar to the double layer glove. Pressure discomfort tolerance threshold is greatly increased by the use of gloves, and pressure— discomfort thresholds are raised by 25–65%. The two prototype gloves, although much less bulkier than the double glove, have pressure thresholds that are equal to or superior to that of a double glove. The algometer can be used to assess the safety of glove from mechanical trauma. Hence, the generalizability of the results is somewhat restricted. However, the method of selective protection, without compromising performance appears to be promising and is worth pursuing by glove designers.

AB - Two prototype gloves have been designed and developed at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety performance of the developed gloves. An experiment was conducted to assess the discomfort threshold level at 12 zones on the palmar surface of the hand for five hand conditions — bare hand, single glove, double glove and two prototype gloves. Prototype I consisted of a glove with an extra layer of glove material applied selectively to critical areas of the hand; while prototype II had up to four layers applied to critical areas. This design increases protection in critical areas without increasing bulk, provides performances comparable with single glove, and improves grip strength. The study was conducted using an algometer device to apply pressure to each of the 12 zones, for all hand conditions. The results indicated that for pressure tolerance, prototype II had the highest pressure-discomfort threshold, while prototype I had a threshold similar to the double layer glove. Pressure discomfort tolerance threshold is greatly increased by the use of gloves, and pressure— discomfort thresholds are raised by 25–65%. The two prototype gloves, although much less bulkier than the double glove, have pressure thresholds that are equal to or superior to that of a double glove. The algometer can be used to assess the safety of glove from mechanical trauma. Hence, the generalizability of the results is somewhat restricted. However, the method of selective protection, without compromising performance appears to be promising and is worth pursuing by glove designers.

KW - Algometer

KW - Gloves

KW - Safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033899556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033899556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/001401300184251

DO - 10.1080/001401300184251

M3 - Article

C2 - 10877476

AN - SCOPUS:0033899556

VL - 43

SP - 561

EP - 572

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 5

ER -