Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures

Manish M Tiwari, Jason F. Reynoso, Robin High, Albert W. Tsang, Dmitry Oleynikov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer superior surgical outcomes for most abdominal surgical procedures. However, there is hardly any evidence on surgical outcomes with patient risk stratification. This study aimed to compare outcomes of common laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for varying illness severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for six commonly performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, reflux surgery, gastric bypass surgery, ventral hernia repair, and colectomy was performed using the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database/Resource Manager (CDB/RM). The 3-year discharge data for the six commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures were analyzed for outcome measures including observed mortality, overall patient morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs. Results: In this study, 208,314 patients underwent one of six common surgical procedures by either the open or the laparoscopic approach. Overall, the laparoscopic approach showed significantly lower mortality, reduced morbidity, fewer ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, shorter hospital stay, and significantly reduced hospital costs for all the procedures. At stratification by illness severity, the laparoscopic group showed better or comparable surgical outcomes across all the illness severity groups. However, the observed mortality was comparable for the minor and moderate severity patients between laparoscopic and open surgery for most procedures. The 30-day readmission rate for major/extreme severity patients was comparable between the two groups for most surgical procedures. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopy over conventional open surgery across all illness severity risk groups for common surgical procedures. The results in general show that laparoscopic surgery is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with open surgery and suggest that laparoscopic surgery should be the procedure of choice for all common surgical procedures, regardless of illness severity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1127-1135
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Laparoscopy
Safety
Length of Stay
Hospital Costs
Intensive Care Units
Mortality
Ventral Hernia
Morbidity
Appendectomy
Gastric Bypass
Colectomy
Herniorrhaphy
Cholecystectomy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Colectomy
  • Gastric bypass
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Open surgery
  • Outcomes
  • Reflux surgery
  • Ventral hernia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. / Tiwari, Manish M; Reynoso, Jason F.; High, Robin; Tsang, Albert W.; Oleynikov, Dmitry.

In: Surgical endoscopy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 1127-1135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tiwari, Manish M ; Reynoso, Jason F. ; High, Robin ; Tsang, Albert W. ; Oleynikov, Dmitry. / Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. In: Surgical endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 1127-1135.
@article{abf85caa46e948ed9869b143ef15d3d9,
title = "Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer superior surgical outcomes for most abdominal surgical procedures. However, there is hardly any evidence on surgical outcomes with patient risk stratification. This study aimed to compare outcomes of common laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for varying illness severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for six commonly performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, reflux surgery, gastric bypass surgery, ventral hernia repair, and colectomy was performed using the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database/Resource Manager (CDB/RM). The 3-year discharge data for the six commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures were analyzed for outcome measures including observed mortality, overall patient morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs. Results: In this study, 208,314 patients underwent one of six common surgical procedures by either the open or the laparoscopic approach. Overall, the laparoscopic approach showed significantly lower mortality, reduced morbidity, fewer ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, shorter hospital stay, and significantly reduced hospital costs for all the procedures. At stratification by illness severity, the laparoscopic group showed better or comparable surgical outcomes across all the illness severity groups. However, the observed mortality was comparable for the minor and moderate severity patients between laparoscopic and open surgery for most procedures. The 30-day readmission rate for major/extreme severity patients was comparable between the two groups for most surgical procedures. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopy over conventional open surgery across all illness severity risk groups for common surgical procedures. The results in general show that laparoscopic surgery is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with open surgery and suggest that laparoscopic surgery should be the procedure of choice for all common surgical procedures, regardless of illness severity.",
keywords = "Appendectomy, Cholecystectomy, Colectomy, Gastric bypass, Laparoscopic surgery, Open surgery, Outcomes, Reflux surgery, Ventral hernia",
author = "Tiwari, {Manish M} and Reynoso, {Jason F.} and Robin High and Tsang, {Albert W.} and Dmitry Oleynikov",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1127--1135",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures

AU - Tiwari, Manish M

AU - Reynoso, Jason F.

AU - High, Robin

AU - Tsang, Albert W.

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer superior surgical outcomes for most abdominal surgical procedures. However, there is hardly any evidence on surgical outcomes with patient risk stratification. This study aimed to compare outcomes of common laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for varying illness severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for six commonly performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, reflux surgery, gastric bypass surgery, ventral hernia repair, and colectomy was performed using the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database/Resource Manager (CDB/RM). The 3-year discharge data for the six commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures were analyzed for outcome measures including observed mortality, overall patient morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs. Results: In this study, 208,314 patients underwent one of six common surgical procedures by either the open or the laparoscopic approach. Overall, the laparoscopic approach showed significantly lower mortality, reduced morbidity, fewer ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, shorter hospital stay, and significantly reduced hospital costs for all the procedures. At stratification by illness severity, the laparoscopic group showed better or comparable surgical outcomes across all the illness severity groups. However, the observed mortality was comparable for the minor and moderate severity patients between laparoscopic and open surgery for most procedures. The 30-day readmission rate for major/extreme severity patients was comparable between the two groups for most surgical procedures. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopy over conventional open surgery across all illness severity risk groups for common surgical procedures. The results in general show that laparoscopic surgery is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with open surgery and suggest that laparoscopic surgery should be the procedure of choice for all common surgical procedures, regardless of illness severity.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer superior surgical outcomes for most abdominal surgical procedures. However, there is hardly any evidence on surgical outcomes with patient risk stratification. This study aimed to compare outcomes of common laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for varying illness severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for six commonly performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, reflux surgery, gastric bypass surgery, ventral hernia repair, and colectomy was performed using the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database/Resource Manager (CDB/RM). The 3-year discharge data for the six commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures were analyzed for outcome measures including observed mortality, overall patient morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs. Results: In this study, 208,314 patients underwent one of six common surgical procedures by either the open or the laparoscopic approach. Overall, the laparoscopic approach showed significantly lower mortality, reduced morbidity, fewer ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, shorter hospital stay, and significantly reduced hospital costs for all the procedures. At stratification by illness severity, the laparoscopic group showed better or comparable surgical outcomes across all the illness severity groups. However, the observed mortality was comparable for the minor and moderate severity patients between laparoscopic and open surgery for most procedures. The 30-day readmission rate for major/extreme severity patients was comparable between the two groups for most surgical procedures. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopy over conventional open surgery across all illness severity risk groups for common surgical procedures. The results in general show that laparoscopic surgery is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with open surgery and suggest that laparoscopic surgery should be the procedure of choice for all common surgical procedures, regardless of illness severity.

KW - Appendectomy

KW - Cholecystectomy

KW - Colectomy

KW - Gastric bypass

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Open surgery

KW - Outcomes

KW - Reflux surgery

KW - Ventral hernia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954427266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954427266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z

DO - 10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 20927546

AN - SCOPUS:79954427266

VL - 25

SP - 1127

EP - 1135

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 4

ER -