Safety and Efficacy of Intratesticular Injection of Vital Dyes for Lymphatic Preservation During Varicocelectomy

John H. Makari, Mohamed A. Atalla, A. Barry Belman, H. Gil Rushton, Shimareet Kumar, Hans G. Pohl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The most common complications of varicocelectomy include failure and hydrocele formation. Various surgical approaches have been used to minimize complications and guarantee durable results. The use of vital dyes to visualize and preserve testicular lymphatics intraoperatively has been proposed to reduce the incidence of hydrocele formation. We investigated the safety of intratesticular injection of various vital dyes and their efficacy in allowing visualization of lymphatics for varicocelectomy. Materials and Methods: Using general anesthesia, 22 adolescent rats underwent bilateral transscrotal intratesticular injection of methylene blue, isosulfan blue, trypan blue or normal saline. All rats with intratesticular injection of a vital dye underwent immediate exploration of the spermatic cord to observe for visualization of lymphatic vessels. At 3 months all rats were euthanized, and orchiectomy was performed for histological examination. Results: Spermatic cord lymphatic vessels were variably visualized depending on concentration and volume of the vital dye used. Histological examination of the testicles at 3 months after injection revealed areas with necrosis of seminiferous tubules, thickened tubular basement membranes, interstitial fibrosis and hyalinization, and striking intratubular dystrophic calcification. These pathological changes were present to varying degrees in all groups. Conclusions: Although spermatic cord lymphatic channels were successfully visualized to varying degrees, intratesticular injection of vital dyes (and even normal saline) produced pathological changes in all groups, despite variation of concentration, volume and type of vital dye. Intratesticular injection of vital dyes for the visualization of lymphatics during varicocelectomy should be abandoned. Paratesticular injection of vital dyes should be used with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1026-1030
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume178
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Coloring Agents
Safety
Injections
Spermatic Cord
Lymphatic Vessels
Seminiferous Tubules
Orchiectomy
Trypan Blue
Methylene Blue
Basement Membrane
General Anesthesia
Testis
Fibrosis
Necrosis
Incidence

Keywords

  • fibrosis
  • lymphocele
  • testicular hydrocele
  • testis
  • varicocele

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Safety and Efficacy of Intratesticular Injection of Vital Dyes for Lymphatic Preservation During Varicocelectomy. / Makari, John H.; Atalla, Mohamed A.; Belman, A. Barry; Rushton, H. Gil; Kumar, Shimareet; Pohl, Hans G.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 178, No. 3, 01.09.2007, p. 1026-1030.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makari, John H. ; Atalla, Mohamed A. ; Belman, A. Barry ; Rushton, H. Gil ; Kumar, Shimareet ; Pohl, Hans G. / Safety and Efficacy of Intratesticular Injection of Vital Dyes for Lymphatic Preservation During Varicocelectomy. In: Journal of Urology. 2007 ; Vol. 178, No. 3. pp. 1026-1030.
@article{b16da502c5c04803944b2b62653cd538,
title = "Safety and Efficacy of Intratesticular Injection of Vital Dyes for Lymphatic Preservation During Varicocelectomy",
abstract = "Purpose: The most common complications of varicocelectomy include failure and hydrocele formation. Various surgical approaches have been used to minimize complications and guarantee durable results. The use of vital dyes to visualize and preserve testicular lymphatics intraoperatively has been proposed to reduce the incidence of hydrocele formation. We investigated the safety of intratesticular injection of various vital dyes and their efficacy in allowing visualization of lymphatics for varicocelectomy. Materials and Methods: Using general anesthesia, 22 adolescent rats underwent bilateral transscrotal intratesticular injection of methylene blue, isosulfan blue, trypan blue or normal saline. All rats with intratesticular injection of a vital dye underwent immediate exploration of the spermatic cord to observe for visualization of lymphatic vessels. At 3 months all rats were euthanized, and orchiectomy was performed for histological examination. Results: Spermatic cord lymphatic vessels were variably visualized depending on concentration and volume of the vital dye used. Histological examination of the testicles at 3 months after injection revealed areas with necrosis of seminiferous tubules, thickened tubular basement membranes, interstitial fibrosis and hyalinization, and striking intratubular dystrophic calcification. These pathological changes were present to varying degrees in all groups. Conclusions: Although spermatic cord lymphatic channels were successfully visualized to varying degrees, intratesticular injection of vital dyes (and even normal saline) produced pathological changes in all groups, despite variation of concentration, volume and type of vital dye. Intratesticular injection of vital dyes for the visualization of lymphatics during varicocelectomy should be abandoned. Paratesticular injection of vital dyes should be used with caution.",
keywords = "fibrosis, lymphocele, testicular hydrocele, testis, varicocele",
author = "Makari, {John H.} and Atalla, {Mohamed A.} and Belman, {A. Barry} and Rushton, {H. Gil} and Shimareet Kumar and Pohl, {Hans G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "1026--1030",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and Efficacy of Intratesticular Injection of Vital Dyes for Lymphatic Preservation During Varicocelectomy

AU - Makari, John H.

AU - Atalla, Mohamed A.

AU - Belman, A. Barry

AU - Rushton, H. Gil

AU - Kumar, Shimareet

AU - Pohl, Hans G.

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - Purpose: The most common complications of varicocelectomy include failure and hydrocele formation. Various surgical approaches have been used to minimize complications and guarantee durable results. The use of vital dyes to visualize and preserve testicular lymphatics intraoperatively has been proposed to reduce the incidence of hydrocele formation. We investigated the safety of intratesticular injection of various vital dyes and their efficacy in allowing visualization of lymphatics for varicocelectomy. Materials and Methods: Using general anesthesia, 22 adolescent rats underwent bilateral transscrotal intratesticular injection of methylene blue, isosulfan blue, trypan blue or normal saline. All rats with intratesticular injection of a vital dye underwent immediate exploration of the spermatic cord to observe for visualization of lymphatic vessels. At 3 months all rats were euthanized, and orchiectomy was performed for histological examination. Results: Spermatic cord lymphatic vessels were variably visualized depending on concentration and volume of the vital dye used. Histological examination of the testicles at 3 months after injection revealed areas with necrosis of seminiferous tubules, thickened tubular basement membranes, interstitial fibrosis and hyalinization, and striking intratubular dystrophic calcification. These pathological changes were present to varying degrees in all groups. Conclusions: Although spermatic cord lymphatic channels were successfully visualized to varying degrees, intratesticular injection of vital dyes (and even normal saline) produced pathological changes in all groups, despite variation of concentration, volume and type of vital dye. Intratesticular injection of vital dyes for the visualization of lymphatics during varicocelectomy should be abandoned. Paratesticular injection of vital dyes should be used with caution.

AB - Purpose: The most common complications of varicocelectomy include failure and hydrocele formation. Various surgical approaches have been used to minimize complications and guarantee durable results. The use of vital dyes to visualize and preserve testicular lymphatics intraoperatively has been proposed to reduce the incidence of hydrocele formation. We investigated the safety of intratesticular injection of various vital dyes and their efficacy in allowing visualization of lymphatics for varicocelectomy. Materials and Methods: Using general anesthesia, 22 adolescent rats underwent bilateral transscrotal intratesticular injection of methylene blue, isosulfan blue, trypan blue or normal saline. All rats with intratesticular injection of a vital dye underwent immediate exploration of the spermatic cord to observe for visualization of lymphatic vessels. At 3 months all rats were euthanized, and orchiectomy was performed for histological examination. Results: Spermatic cord lymphatic vessels were variably visualized depending on concentration and volume of the vital dye used. Histological examination of the testicles at 3 months after injection revealed areas with necrosis of seminiferous tubules, thickened tubular basement membranes, interstitial fibrosis and hyalinization, and striking intratubular dystrophic calcification. These pathological changes were present to varying degrees in all groups. Conclusions: Although spermatic cord lymphatic channels were successfully visualized to varying degrees, intratesticular injection of vital dyes (and even normal saline) produced pathological changes in all groups, despite variation of concentration, volume and type of vital dye. Intratesticular injection of vital dyes for the visualization of lymphatics during varicocelectomy should be abandoned. Paratesticular injection of vital dyes should be used with caution.

KW - fibrosis

KW - lymphocele

KW - testicular hydrocele

KW - testis

KW - varicocele

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547659659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547659659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.072

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.072

M3 - Article

C2 - 17651762

AN - SCOPUS:34547659659

VL - 178

SP - 1026

EP - 1030

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -