Role of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Neonatal Bacteremia

Nathan Messbarger, Kari Neemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Evaluation for neonatal sepsis routinely includes performing both aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures despite our lack of knowledge of the true incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in this age group and the consequences of not performing these paired cultures. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all blood cultures performed for neonates in a children's hospital. Clinically significant pathogens were defined as microorganisms that rarely are considered to be contaminants, that were recovered from multiple blood cultures or sites, or were considered significant according to the patient's attending physician. The chart of every patient with positive culture results was reviewed for patient characteristics. Results: A total of 662 culture sets among 403 patients were obtained between November 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. A clinically significant organism was isolated from 64 (9.7%) culture sets from 25 patients (1.9% contamination rate). A total of 56 organisms were isolated; 35 (62.5%) grew from both the aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 19 (33.9%) grew from the anaerobic bottle alone, and 2 (3.6%) grew from the aerobic bottle alone. One (0.2%) obligate anaerobic bacterium (Clostridium symbiosum) was identified. Conclusions: Although the incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in neonates is rare, anaerobic culture remains important in this population, given the increased yield of both aerobic and facultative anaerobic organisms isolated from anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e65-e69
JournalJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 17 2018

Fingerprint

Bacteremia
Clostridium symbiosum
Newborn Infant
Anaerobic Bacteria
Incidence
Age Groups
Blood Culture
Physicians
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Role of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Neonatal Bacteremia. / Messbarger, Nathan; Neemann, Kari.

In: Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, Vol. 7, No. 3, 17.08.2018, p. e65-e69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4becfbdd97214b1c97369a41f2037941,
title = "Role of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Neonatal Bacteremia",
abstract = "Background: Evaluation for neonatal sepsis routinely includes performing both aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures despite our lack of knowledge of the true incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in this age group and the consequences of not performing these paired cultures. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all blood cultures performed for neonates in a children's hospital. Clinically significant pathogens were defined as microorganisms that rarely are considered to be contaminants, that were recovered from multiple blood cultures or sites, or were considered significant according to the patient's attending physician. The chart of every patient with positive culture results was reviewed for patient characteristics. Results: A total of 662 culture sets among 403 patients were obtained between November 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. A clinically significant organism was isolated from 64 (9.7{\%}) culture sets from 25 patients (1.9{\%} contamination rate). A total of 56 organisms were isolated; 35 (62.5{\%}) grew from both the aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 19 (33.9{\%}) grew from the anaerobic bottle alone, and 2 (3.6{\%}) grew from the aerobic bottle alone. One (0.2{\%}) obligate anaerobic bacterium (Clostridium symbiosum) was identified. Conclusions: Although the incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in neonates is rare, anaerobic culture remains important in this population, given the increased yield of both aerobic and facultative anaerobic organisms isolated from anaerobic blood culture bottles.",
author = "Nathan Messbarger and Kari Neemann",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1093/jpids/pix088",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "e65--e69",
journal = "Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society",
issn = "2048-7193",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Neonatal Bacteremia

AU - Messbarger, Nathan

AU - Neemann, Kari

PY - 2018/8/17

Y1 - 2018/8/17

N2 - Background: Evaluation for neonatal sepsis routinely includes performing both aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures despite our lack of knowledge of the true incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in this age group and the consequences of not performing these paired cultures. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all blood cultures performed for neonates in a children's hospital. Clinically significant pathogens were defined as microorganisms that rarely are considered to be contaminants, that were recovered from multiple blood cultures or sites, or were considered significant according to the patient's attending physician. The chart of every patient with positive culture results was reviewed for patient characteristics. Results: A total of 662 culture sets among 403 patients were obtained between November 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. A clinically significant organism was isolated from 64 (9.7%) culture sets from 25 patients (1.9% contamination rate). A total of 56 organisms were isolated; 35 (62.5%) grew from both the aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 19 (33.9%) grew from the anaerobic bottle alone, and 2 (3.6%) grew from the aerobic bottle alone. One (0.2%) obligate anaerobic bacterium (Clostridium symbiosum) was identified. Conclusions: Although the incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in neonates is rare, anaerobic culture remains important in this population, given the increased yield of both aerobic and facultative anaerobic organisms isolated from anaerobic blood culture bottles.

AB - Background: Evaluation for neonatal sepsis routinely includes performing both aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures despite our lack of knowledge of the true incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in this age group and the consequences of not performing these paired cultures. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all blood cultures performed for neonates in a children's hospital. Clinically significant pathogens were defined as microorganisms that rarely are considered to be contaminants, that were recovered from multiple blood cultures or sites, or were considered significant according to the patient's attending physician. The chart of every patient with positive culture results was reviewed for patient characteristics. Results: A total of 662 culture sets among 403 patients were obtained between November 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. A clinically significant organism was isolated from 64 (9.7%) culture sets from 25 patients (1.9% contamination rate). A total of 56 organisms were isolated; 35 (62.5%) grew from both the aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 19 (33.9%) grew from the anaerobic bottle alone, and 2 (3.6%) grew from the aerobic bottle alone. One (0.2%) obligate anaerobic bacterium (Clostridium symbiosum) was identified. Conclusions: Although the incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in neonates is rare, anaerobic culture remains important in this population, given the increased yield of both aerobic and facultative anaerobic organisms isolated from anaerobic blood culture bottles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048037321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048037321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jpids/pix088

DO - 10.1093/jpids/pix088

M3 - Article

C2 - 29165580

AN - SCOPUS:85048037321

VL - 7

SP - e65-e69

JO - Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society

JF - Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society

SN - 2048-7193

IS - 3

ER -