Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify significant risk factors for agricultural injury based on the literature. The authors conducted a systematic review of commonly reported risk factors. Studies that reported adjusted odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) estimates for the selected risk factors were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar. Pooled risk factor estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. A total of 441 (PubMed) and 285 (Google Scholar) studies were found in the initial searches; of these, 132 and 78 studies, respectively, met the selection criteria for injury outcomes, and 32 of these reported adjusted OR or RR estimates. One study was excluded because it did not meet the set Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality criteria. Finally, 31 studies were used for meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for the risk factors were as follows: male gender (vs. female) 1.68, full-time farmer (vs. part-time) 2.17, owner/operator (vs. family member or hired worker) 1.64, regular medication use (vs. no regular medication use) 1.57, prior injury (vs. no prior injury) 1.75, health problems (vs. no health problems) 1.21, stress or depression (vs. no stress or depression) 1.86, and hearing loss (vs. no hearing loss) 2.01. All selected factors except health problems significantly increased the risk of injury, and they should be (a) considered when selecting high-risk populations for interventions, and (b) considered as potential confounders in intervention studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-449
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Agromedicine
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2015

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Hearing Loss
PubMed
Health
Odds Ratio
Depression
Patient Selection
Population

Keywords

  • Agricultural injury
  • farm injury
  • meta-analysis
  • risk factor
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. / Jadhav, Rohan; Achutan, Chandran; Haynatzki, Gleb; Rajaram, Shireen; Rautiainen, Risto.

In: Journal of Agromedicine, Vol. 20, No. 4, 02.10.2015, p. 434-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{853776cb59dc497ba3e07df93fe584c8,
title = "Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to identify significant risk factors for agricultural injury based on the literature. The authors conducted a systematic review of commonly reported risk factors. Studies that reported adjusted odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) estimates for the selected risk factors were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar. Pooled risk factor estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. A total of 441 (PubMed) and 285 (Google Scholar) studies were found in the initial searches; of these, 132 and 78 studies, respectively, met the selection criteria for injury outcomes, and 32 of these reported adjusted OR or RR estimates. One study was excluded because it did not meet the set Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality criteria. Finally, 31 studies were used for meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for the risk factors were as follows: male gender (vs. female) 1.68, full-time farmer (vs. part-time) 2.17, owner/operator (vs. family member or hired worker) 1.64, regular medication use (vs. no regular medication use) 1.57, prior injury (vs. no prior injury) 1.75, health problems (vs. no health problems) 1.21, stress or depression (vs. no stress or depression) 1.86, and hearing loss (vs. no hearing loss) 2.01. All selected factors except health problems significantly increased the risk of injury, and they should be (a) considered when selecting high-risk populations for interventions, and (b) considered as potential confounders in intervention studies.",
keywords = "Agricultural injury, farm injury, meta-analysis, risk factor, systematic review",
author = "Rohan Jadhav and Chandran Achutan and Gleb Haynatzki and Shireen Rajaram and Risto Rautiainen",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/1059924X.2015.1075450",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "434--449",
journal = "Journal of Agromedicine",
issn = "1059-924X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AU - Jadhav, Rohan

AU - Achutan, Chandran

AU - Haynatzki, Gleb

AU - Rajaram, Shireen

AU - Rautiainen, Risto

PY - 2015/10/2

Y1 - 2015/10/2

N2 - The objective of this study was to identify significant risk factors for agricultural injury based on the literature. The authors conducted a systematic review of commonly reported risk factors. Studies that reported adjusted odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) estimates for the selected risk factors were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar. Pooled risk factor estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. A total of 441 (PubMed) and 285 (Google Scholar) studies were found in the initial searches; of these, 132 and 78 studies, respectively, met the selection criteria for injury outcomes, and 32 of these reported adjusted OR or RR estimates. One study was excluded because it did not meet the set Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality criteria. Finally, 31 studies were used for meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for the risk factors were as follows: male gender (vs. female) 1.68, full-time farmer (vs. part-time) 2.17, owner/operator (vs. family member or hired worker) 1.64, regular medication use (vs. no regular medication use) 1.57, prior injury (vs. no prior injury) 1.75, health problems (vs. no health problems) 1.21, stress or depression (vs. no stress or depression) 1.86, and hearing loss (vs. no hearing loss) 2.01. All selected factors except health problems significantly increased the risk of injury, and they should be (a) considered when selecting high-risk populations for interventions, and (b) considered as potential confounders in intervention studies.

AB - The objective of this study was to identify significant risk factors for agricultural injury based on the literature. The authors conducted a systematic review of commonly reported risk factors. Studies that reported adjusted odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) estimates for the selected risk factors were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar. Pooled risk factor estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. A total of 441 (PubMed) and 285 (Google Scholar) studies were found in the initial searches; of these, 132 and 78 studies, respectively, met the selection criteria for injury outcomes, and 32 of these reported adjusted OR or RR estimates. One study was excluded because it did not meet the set Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality criteria. Finally, 31 studies were used for meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for the risk factors were as follows: male gender (vs. female) 1.68, full-time farmer (vs. part-time) 2.17, owner/operator (vs. family member or hired worker) 1.64, regular medication use (vs. no regular medication use) 1.57, prior injury (vs. no prior injury) 1.75, health problems (vs. no health problems) 1.21, stress or depression (vs. no stress or depression) 1.86, and hearing loss (vs. no hearing loss) 2.01. All selected factors except health problems significantly increased the risk of injury, and they should be (a) considered when selecting high-risk populations for interventions, and (b) considered as potential confounders in intervention studies.

KW - Agricultural injury

KW - farm injury

KW - meta-analysis

KW - risk factor

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945127070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945127070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1075450

DO - 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1075450

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26471953

AN - SCOPUS:84945127070

VL - 20

SP - 434

EP - 449

JO - Journal of Agromedicine

JF - Journal of Agromedicine

SN - 1059-924X

IS - 4

ER -