Review of transverse reinforcement requirements for precast load-bearing wall panels with large openings under compression

Mohamed Elkady, George Morcous, Maher K. Tadros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Precast concrete load-bearing wall panels have been used for decades with unparalleled success due to their architectural versatility, thermal insulation, ease of production and erection, and structural performance. According to the current building code, structural walls do not need transverse ties if the vertical reinforcement ratio is less than 1% or when vertical reinforcement is not required as compression reinforcement. Also, minimum reinforcement requirements do not apply to structural walls with an average effective prestress of 1,551 kPa (225 psi) or greater. Elimination of transverse ties in structural precast walls simplifies the production of the panels. The presence of large openings in precast walls is very common in the design of modern buildings. This results in a significant reduction of the panel cross section. Most designers tend to design the remaining portion of the panel cross section as a column and not a wall, which requires minimum transverse ties according to the current building code in the United States. The requirement could complicate wall detailing and reduce the efficiency and economy of panel fabrication. This paper summarizes the literature review conducted to determine when precast load-bearing walls should be designed as columns/walls with respect to transverse reinforcement. The requirements of transverse reinforcement in walls and columns in various building codes were studied, and design recommendations were made.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number06013003
JournalJournal of Architectural Engineering
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2014

Fingerprint

Bearings (structural)
Reinforcement
Precast concrete
Thermal insulation
Transverse
Compression
Fabrication

Keywords

  • Large openings
  • Precast wall panels
  • Stirrups
  • Ties
  • Transverse reinforcement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Building and Construction
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Review of transverse reinforcement requirements for precast load-bearing wall panels with large openings under compression. / Elkady, Mohamed; Morcous, George; Tadros, Maher K.

In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06013003, 01.06.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b10a36b115f84b1da84bd15c17464aa0,
title = "Review of transverse reinforcement requirements for precast load-bearing wall panels with large openings under compression",
abstract = "Precast concrete load-bearing wall panels have been used for decades with unparalleled success due to their architectural versatility, thermal insulation, ease of production and erection, and structural performance. According to the current building code, structural walls do not need transverse ties if the vertical reinforcement ratio is less than 1{\%} or when vertical reinforcement is not required as compression reinforcement. Also, minimum reinforcement requirements do not apply to structural walls with an average effective prestress of 1,551 kPa (225 psi) or greater. Elimination of transverse ties in structural precast walls simplifies the production of the panels. The presence of large openings in precast walls is very common in the design of modern buildings. This results in a significant reduction of the panel cross section. Most designers tend to design the remaining portion of the panel cross section as a column and not a wall, which requires minimum transverse ties according to the current building code in the United States. The requirement could complicate wall detailing and reduce the efficiency and economy of panel fabrication. This paper summarizes the literature review conducted to determine when precast load-bearing walls should be designed as columns/walls with respect to transverse reinforcement. The requirements of transverse reinforcement in walls and columns in various building codes were studied, and design recommendations were made.",
keywords = "Large openings, Precast wall panels, Stirrups, Ties, Transverse reinforcement",
author = "Mohamed Elkady and George Morcous and Tadros, {Maher K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Engineering",
issn = "1076-0431",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of transverse reinforcement requirements for precast load-bearing wall panels with large openings under compression

AU - Elkady, Mohamed

AU - Morcous, George

AU - Tadros, Maher K.

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - Precast concrete load-bearing wall panels have been used for decades with unparalleled success due to their architectural versatility, thermal insulation, ease of production and erection, and structural performance. According to the current building code, structural walls do not need transverse ties if the vertical reinforcement ratio is less than 1% or when vertical reinforcement is not required as compression reinforcement. Also, minimum reinforcement requirements do not apply to structural walls with an average effective prestress of 1,551 kPa (225 psi) or greater. Elimination of transverse ties in structural precast walls simplifies the production of the panels. The presence of large openings in precast walls is very common in the design of modern buildings. This results in a significant reduction of the panel cross section. Most designers tend to design the remaining portion of the panel cross section as a column and not a wall, which requires minimum transverse ties according to the current building code in the United States. The requirement could complicate wall detailing and reduce the efficiency and economy of panel fabrication. This paper summarizes the literature review conducted to determine when precast load-bearing walls should be designed as columns/walls with respect to transverse reinforcement. The requirements of transverse reinforcement in walls and columns in various building codes were studied, and design recommendations were made.

AB - Precast concrete load-bearing wall panels have been used for decades with unparalleled success due to their architectural versatility, thermal insulation, ease of production and erection, and structural performance. According to the current building code, structural walls do not need transverse ties if the vertical reinforcement ratio is less than 1% or when vertical reinforcement is not required as compression reinforcement. Also, minimum reinforcement requirements do not apply to structural walls with an average effective prestress of 1,551 kPa (225 psi) or greater. Elimination of transverse ties in structural precast walls simplifies the production of the panels. The presence of large openings in precast walls is very common in the design of modern buildings. This results in a significant reduction of the panel cross section. Most designers tend to design the remaining portion of the panel cross section as a column and not a wall, which requires minimum transverse ties according to the current building code in the United States. The requirement could complicate wall detailing and reduce the efficiency and economy of panel fabrication. This paper summarizes the literature review conducted to determine when precast load-bearing walls should be designed as columns/walls with respect to transverse reinforcement. The requirements of transverse reinforcement in walls and columns in various building codes were studied, and design recommendations were made.

KW - Large openings

KW - Precast wall panels

KW - Stirrups

KW - Ties

KW - Transverse reinforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901045195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901045195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000141

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000141

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901045195

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering

JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering

SN - 1076-0431

IS - 2

M1 - 06013003

ER -