Retrofit of distillation columns using thermodynamic analysis

Yasar Demirel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thermodynamic analysis provides the column grand composite curves and exergy loss profiles, which are becoming readily available for a converged distillation column simulation. For example, the Aspen Plus simulator performs the thermodynamic analysis through its Column-Targeting tool for rigorous column calculations. This study uses the column grand composite curves and the exergy loss profiles obtained from Aspen Plus to assess the performance of the existing distillation columns, and reduce the costs of operation by appropriate retrofits in a methanol plant. Effectiveness of the retrofits is also assessed by means of thermodynamics and economics. The methanol plant utilizes two distillation columns to purify the methanol in its separation Section. The first column operates with 51 stages, has a side heat stream to the last stage, a partial condenser at the top and a side condenser at stage 2, and no reboiler. The second column operates with 95 stages, has a side heat stream to stage 95, a total condenser, and high reflux ratio. Despite the heat integration of the columns with the other Sections and a side condenser in column 1, the assessment of converged base case simulations have indicated the need for more profitable operations, and the required retrofits are suggested. For the first column, the retrofits consisting of a feed preheating and a second side condenser at stage 4 have reduced the total exergy loss by 21.5%. For the second column, the retrofits of two side reboilers at stages 87 and 92 have reduced the total exergy loss by 41.3%. After the retrofits, the thermodynamic efficiency has increased to 55.4% from 50.6% for the first column, while it has increased to 6.7% from 4.0% for the second. The suggested retrofits have reduced the exergy losses and hence the cost of energy considerably, and proved to be more profitable despite the fixed capital costs of retrofits for the distillation columns of the methanol plant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-817
Number of pages27
JournalSeparation Science and Technology
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

Exergy
Distillation columns
Thermodynamics
Methanol
Reboilers
Costs
Preheating
Composite materials
Simulators
Economics
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Column grand composite curves
  • Exergy loss
  • Retrofitting
  • Thermodynamic analysis
  • Thermodynamic efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Process Chemistry and Technology
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Retrofit of distillation columns using thermodynamic analysis. / Demirel, Yasar.

In: Separation Science and Technology, Vol. 41, No. 5, 01.04.2006, p. 791-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7594ff8c48a049b7a5cb24dc69e36f4f,
title = "Retrofit of distillation columns using thermodynamic analysis",
abstract = "Thermodynamic analysis provides the column grand composite curves and exergy loss profiles, which are becoming readily available for a converged distillation column simulation. For example, the Aspen Plus simulator performs the thermodynamic analysis through its Column-Targeting tool for rigorous column calculations. This study uses the column grand composite curves and the exergy loss profiles obtained from Aspen Plus to assess the performance of the existing distillation columns, and reduce the costs of operation by appropriate retrofits in a methanol plant. Effectiveness of the retrofits is also assessed by means of thermodynamics and economics. The methanol plant utilizes two distillation columns to purify the methanol in its separation Section. The first column operates with 51 stages, has a side heat stream to the last stage, a partial condenser at the top and a side condenser at stage 2, and no reboiler. The second column operates with 95 stages, has a side heat stream to stage 95, a total condenser, and high reflux ratio. Despite the heat integration of the columns with the other Sections and a side condenser in column 1, the assessment of converged base case simulations have indicated the need for more profitable operations, and the required retrofits are suggested. For the first column, the retrofits consisting of a feed preheating and a second side condenser at stage 4 have reduced the total exergy loss by 21.5{\%}. For the second column, the retrofits of two side reboilers at stages 87 and 92 have reduced the total exergy loss by 41.3{\%}. After the retrofits, the thermodynamic efficiency has increased to 55.4{\%} from 50.6{\%} for the first column, while it has increased to 6.7{\%} from 4.0{\%} for the second. The suggested retrofits have reduced the exergy losses and hence the cost of energy considerably, and proved to be more profitable despite the fixed capital costs of retrofits for the distillation columns of the methanol plant.",
keywords = "Column grand composite curves, Exergy loss, Retrofitting, Thermodynamic analysis, Thermodynamic efficiency",
author = "Yasar Demirel",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01496390600600047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "791--817",
journal = "Separation Science and Technology",
issn = "0149-6395",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrofit of distillation columns using thermodynamic analysis

AU - Demirel, Yasar

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Thermodynamic analysis provides the column grand composite curves and exergy loss profiles, which are becoming readily available for a converged distillation column simulation. For example, the Aspen Plus simulator performs the thermodynamic analysis through its Column-Targeting tool for rigorous column calculations. This study uses the column grand composite curves and the exergy loss profiles obtained from Aspen Plus to assess the performance of the existing distillation columns, and reduce the costs of operation by appropriate retrofits in a methanol plant. Effectiveness of the retrofits is also assessed by means of thermodynamics and economics. The methanol plant utilizes two distillation columns to purify the methanol in its separation Section. The first column operates with 51 stages, has a side heat stream to the last stage, a partial condenser at the top and a side condenser at stage 2, and no reboiler. The second column operates with 95 stages, has a side heat stream to stage 95, a total condenser, and high reflux ratio. Despite the heat integration of the columns with the other Sections and a side condenser in column 1, the assessment of converged base case simulations have indicated the need for more profitable operations, and the required retrofits are suggested. For the first column, the retrofits consisting of a feed preheating and a second side condenser at stage 4 have reduced the total exergy loss by 21.5%. For the second column, the retrofits of two side reboilers at stages 87 and 92 have reduced the total exergy loss by 41.3%. After the retrofits, the thermodynamic efficiency has increased to 55.4% from 50.6% for the first column, while it has increased to 6.7% from 4.0% for the second. The suggested retrofits have reduced the exergy losses and hence the cost of energy considerably, and proved to be more profitable despite the fixed capital costs of retrofits for the distillation columns of the methanol plant.

AB - Thermodynamic analysis provides the column grand composite curves and exergy loss profiles, which are becoming readily available for a converged distillation column simulation. For example, the Aspen Plus simulator performs the thermodynamic analysis through its Column-Targeting tool for rigorous column calculations. This study uses the column grand composite curves and the exergy loss profiles obtained from Aspen Plus to assess the performance of the existing distillation columns, and reduce the costs of operation by appropriate retrofits in a methanol plant. Effectiveness of the retrofits is also assessed by means of thermodynamics and economics. The methanol plant utilizes two distillation columns to purify the methanol in its separation Section. The first column operates with 51 stages, has a side heat stream to the last stage, a partial condenser at the top and a side condenser at stage 2, and no reboiler. The second column operates with 95 stages, has a side heat stream to stage 95, a total condenser, and high reflux ratio. Despite the heat integration of the columns with the other Sections and a side condenser in column 1, the assessment of converged base case simulations have indicated the need for more profitable operations, and the required retrofits are suggested. For the first column, the retrofits consisting of a feed preheating and a second side condenser at stage 4 have reduced the total exergy loss by 21.5%. For the second column, the retrofits of two side reboilers at stages 87 and 92 have reduced the total exergy loss by 41.3%. After the retrofits, the thermodynamic efficiency has increased to 55.4% from 50.6% for the first column, while it has increased to 6.7% from 4.0% for the second. The suggested retrofits have reduced the exergy losses and hence the cost of energy considerably, and proved to be more profitable despite the fixed capital costs of retrofits for the distillation columns of the methanol plant.

KW - Column grand composite curves

KW - Exergy loss

KW - Retrofitting

KW - Thermodynamic analysis

KW - Thermodynamic efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646344528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646344528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01496390600600047

DO - 10.1080/01496390600600047

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 791

EP - 817

JO - Separation Science and Technology

JF - Separation Science and Technology

SN - 0149-6395

IS - 5

ER -