Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Matthew J Teusink, Ioannis P. Pappou, Daniel Grant Schwartz, Benjamin J. Cottrell, Mark A. Frankle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal management of this complication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation after RSA managed with closed reduction. Methods: All patients who were treated with a closed reduction for dislocation after RSA in the period between May 2002 and September 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Final outcomes including recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 patients were identified. Nearly 50% of cases (10 of 21) had previous surgery, with 80% (8 of 10) of these being previous arthroplasty. The average time to first dislocation was 200days, with 62% (13 of 21) occurring in the first 90days. At average follow-up of 28months, 62% of these shoulders remained stable (13 of 21), 29% required revision surgery (6 of 21), and 9% remained unstable (2 of 21). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 68.0 for patients treated with closed reduction for instability and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (P=.64). Discussion: This study shows that an initial dislocation episode after RSA with use of this implant can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in more than half of cases. Given that outcomes after revision surgery are not different from those after closed treatment, we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in the office setting in all cases of postoperative RSA dislocation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-627
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Reoperation
Elbow
Shoulder Dislocation
Articular Range of Motion
Immobilization

Keywords

  • Case series
  • Closed reduction
  • Dislocation
  • Level IV
  • Nonoperative treatment
  • Retrospective review
  • Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  • Revision
  • Treatment study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. / Teusink, Matthew J; Pappou, Ioannis P.; Schwartz, Daniel Grant; Cottrell, Benjamin J.; Frankle, Mark A.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 621-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teusink, Matthew J ; Pappou, Ioannis P. ; Schwartz, Daniel Grant ; Cottrell, Benjamin J. ; Frankle, Mark A. / Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 621-627.
@article{84d0114c658345b7833edcda29bad66d,
title = "Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty",
abstract = "Background: Postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal management of this complication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation after RSA managed with closed reduction. Methods: All patients who were treated with a closed reduction for dislocation after RSA in the period between May 2002 and September 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Final outcomes including recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 patients were identified. Nearly 50{\%} of cases (10 of 21) had previous surgery, with 80{\%} (8 of 10) of these being previous arthroplasty. The average time to first dislocation was 200days, with 62{\%} (13 of 21) occurring in the first 90days. At average follow-up of 28months, 62{\%} of these shoulders remained stable (13 of 21), 29{\%} required revision surgery (6 of 21), and 9{\%} remained unstable (2 of 21). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 68.0 for patients treated with closed reduction for instability and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (P=.64). Discussion: This study shows that an initial dislocation episode after RSA with use of this implant can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in more than half of cases. Given that outcomes after revision surgery are not different from those after closed treatment, we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in the office setting in all cases of postoperative RSA dislocation.",
keywords = "Case series, Closed reduction, Dislocation, Level IV, Nonoperative treatment, Retrospective review, Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Revision, Treatment study",
author = "Teusink, {Matthew J} and Pappou, {Ioannis P.} and Schwartz, {Daniel Grant} and Cottrell, {Benjamin J.} and Frankle, {Mark A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "621--627",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

AU - Teusink, Matthew J

AU - Pappou, Ioannis P.

AU - Schwartz, Daniel Grant

AU - Cottrell, Benjamin J.

AU - Frankle, Mark A.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Background: Postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal management of this complication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation after RSA managed with closed reduction. Methods: All patients who were treated with a closed reduction for dislocation after RSA in the period between May 2002 and September 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Final outcomes including recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 patients were identified. Nearly 50% of cases (10 of 21) had previous surgery, with 80% (8 of 10) of these being previous arthroplasty. The average time to first dislocation was 200days, with 62% (13 of 21) occurring in the first 90days. At average follow-up of 28months, 62% of these shoulders remained stable (13 of 21), 29% required revision surgery (6 of 21), and 9% remained unstable (2 of 21). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 68.0 for patients treated with closed reduction for instability and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (P=.64). Discussion: This study shows that an initial dislocation episode after RSA with use of this implant can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in more than half of cases. Given that outcomes after revision surgery are not different from those after closed treatment, we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in the office setting in all cases of postoperative RSA dislocation.

AB - Background: Postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal management of this complication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation after RSA managed with closed reduction. Methods: All patients who were treated with a closed reduction for dislocation after RSA in the period between May 2002 and September 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Final outcomes including recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 patients were identified. Nearly 50% of cases (10 of 21) had previous surgery, with 80% (8 of 10) of these being previous arthroplasty. The average time to first dislocation was 200days, with 62% (13 of 21) occurring in the first 90days. At average follow-up of 28months, 62% of these shoulders remained stable (13 of 21), 29% required revision surgery (6 of 21), and 9% remained unstable (2 of 21). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 68.0 for patients treated with closed reduction for instability and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (P=.64). Discussion: This study shows that an initial dislocation episode after RSA with use of this implant can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in more than half of cases. Given that outcomes after revision surgery are not different from those after closed treatment, we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in the office setting in all cases of postoperative RSA dislocation.

KW - Case series

KW - Closed reduction

KW - Dislocation

KW - Level IV

KW - Nonoperative treatment

KW - Retrospective review

KW - Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

KW - Revision

KW - Treatment study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925257790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925257790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.015

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 621

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 4

ER -