Resource allocation and funding challenges for regional local health departments in Nebraska

Li-Wu Chen, Janelle Jacobson, Sara Roberts, David W Palm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the mechanism of resource allocation among member counties and the funding challenges of regional health departments (RHDs) in Nebraska. Design and Study Setting: In 2009, we conducted a qualitative case study of 2 Nebraska RHDs to gain insight into their experiences of making resource allocation decisions and confronting funding challenges. The 2 RHD sites were selected for this case study on the basis of their heterogeneity in terms of population distribution in member counties. Sixteen semistructured in-person interviews were conducted with RHD directors, staff, and board of health members. Interview data were coded and analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software (QSR International [Americas] Inc., Cambridge, MA). Results: Our findings suggested that the directors of RHDs play an integral role in making resource allocation decisions on the basis of community needs, not on a formula or on individual county population size. Interviewees also reported that the size of the vulnerable population served by the RHD had a significant impact on the level of resources for RHD's programs. The RHD's decisions about resource allocation were also dependent on the amount and type of resources received from the state. Interviewees identified inadequacy and instability of funding as the 2 main funding challenges for their RHD. These challenges negatively impacted workforce capacity and the long-term sustainability of some programs. Conclusions: Regional health departments may not benefit from better leveraging resources and building a stronger structural capacity unless the issues of funding inadequacy and instability are addressed. Strategies that can be used by RHDs to address these funding challenges include seeking grants to support programs, leveraging existing resources, and building community partnerships to share resources. Future research is needed to identify RHDs optimal workforce capacity, required funding level, and potential funding mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-147
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Resource Allocation
Health
Interviews
Organized Financing
Program Evaluation
Vulnerable Populations
Population Density
Software
Demography

Keywords

  • funding sources and challenges
  • regional local health departments
  • resource allocation
  • workforce capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Resource allocation and funding challenges for regional local health departments in Nebraska. / Chen, Li-Wu; Jacobson, Janelle; Roberts, Sara; Palm, David W.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 141-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c45bed3fd0443419ac10db6d1b2f325,
title = "Resource allocation and funding challenges for regional local health departments in Nebraska",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined the mechanism of resource allocation among member counties and the funding challenges of regional health departments (RHDs) in Nebraska. Design and Study Setting: In 2009, we conducted a qualitative case study of 2 Nebraska RHDs to gain insight into their experiences of making resource allocation decisions and confronting funding challenges. The 2 RHD sites were selected for this case study on the basis of their heterogeneity in terms of population distribution in member counties. Sixteen semistructured in-person interviews were conducted with RHD directors, staff, and board of health members. Interview data were coded and analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software (QSR International [Americas] Inc., Cambridge, MA). Results: Our findings suggested that the directors of RHDs play an integral role in making resource allocation decisions on the basis of community needs, not on a formula or on individual county population size. Interviewees also reported that the size of the vulnerable population served by the RHD had a significant impact on the level of resources for RHD's programs. The RHD's decisions about resource allocation were also dependent on the amount and type of resources received from the state. Interviewees identified inadequacy and instability of funding as the 2 main funding challenges for their RHD. These challenges negatively impacted workforce capacity and the long-term sustainability of some programs. Conclusions: Regional health departments may not benefit from better leveraging resources and building a stronger structural capacity unless the issues of funding inadequacy and instability are addressed. Strategies that can be used by RHDs to address these funding challenges include seeking grants to support programs, leveraging existing resources, and building community partnerships to share resources. Future research is needed to identify RHDs optimal workforce capacity, required funding level, and potential funding mechanisms.",
keywords = "funding sources and challenges, regional local health departments, resource allocation, workforce capacity",
author = "Li-Wu Chen and Janelle Jacobson and Sara Roberts and Palm, {David W}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182294fff",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "141--147",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource allocation and funding challenges for regional local health departments in Nebraska

AU - Chen, Li-Wu

AU - Jacobson, Janelle

AU - Roberts, Sara

AU - Palm, David W

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Objective: This study examined the mechanism of resource allocation among member counties and the funding challenges of regional health departments (RHDs) in Nebraska. Design and Study Setting: In 2009, we conducted a qualitative case study of 2 Nebraska RHDs to gain insight into their experiences of making resource allocation decisions and confronting funding challenges. The 2 RHD sites were selected for this case study on the basis of their heterogeneity in terms of population distribution in member counties. Sixteen semistructured in-person interviews were conducted with RHD directors, staff, and board of health members. Interview data were coded and analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software (QSR International [Americas] Inc., Cambridge, MA). Results: Our findings suggested that the directors of RHDs play an integral role in making resource allocation decisions on the basis of community needs, not on a formula or on individual county population size. Interviewees also reported that the size of the vulnerable population served by the RHD had a significant impact on the level of resources for RHD's programs. The RHD's decisions about resource allocation were also dependent on the amount and type of resources received from the state. Interviewees identified inadequacy and instability of funding as the 2 main funding challenges for their RHD. These challenges negatively impacted workforce capacity and the long-term sustainability of some programs. Conclusions: Regional health departments may not benefit from better leveraging resources and building a stronger structural capacity unless the issues of funding inadequacy and instability are addressed. Strategies that can be used by RHDs to address these funding challenges include seeking grants to support programs, leveraging existing resources, and building community partnerships to share resources. Future research is needed to identify RHDs optimal workforce capacity, required funding level, and potential funding mechanisms.

AB - Objective: This study examined the mechanism of resource allocation among member counties and the funding challenges of regional health departments (RHDs) in Nebraska. Design and Study Setting: In 2009, we conducted a qualitative case study of 2 Nebraska RHDs to gain insight into their experiences of making resource allocation decisions and confronting funding challenges. The 2 RHD sites were selected for this case study on the basis of their heterogeneity in terms of population distribution in member counties. Sixteen semistructured in-person interviews were conducted with RHD directors, staff, and board of health members. Interview data were coded and analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software (QSR International [Americas] Inc., Cambridge, MA). Results: Our findings suggested that the directors of RHDs play an integral role in making resource allocation decisions on the basis of community needs, not on a formula or on individual county population size. Interviewees also reported that the size of the vulnerable population served by the RHD had a significant impact on the level of resources for RHD's programs. The RHD's decisions about resource allocation were also dependent on the amount and type of resources received from the state. Interviewees identified inadequacy and instability of funding as the 2 main funding challenges for their RHD. These challenges negatively impacted workforce capacity and the long-term sustainability of some programs. Conclusions: Regional health departments may not benefit from better leveraging resources and building a stronger structural capacity unless the issues of funding inadequacy and instability are addressed. Strategies that can be used by RHDs to address these funding challenges include seeking grants to support programs, leveraging existing resources, and building community partnerships to share resources. Future research is needed to identify RHDs optimal workforce capacity, required funding level, and potential funding mechanisms.

KW - funding sources and challenges

KW - regional local health departments

KW - resource allocation

KW - workforce capacity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856757889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856757889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182294fff

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182294fff

M3 - Article

C2 - 22286282

AN - SCOPUS:84856757889

VL - 18

SP - 141

EP - 147

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 2

ER -