Representing A Territory: Constituency Boundaries for the British House of Commons of the 1980 s

John R Hibbing, Samuel C. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1983, the boundary lines for constituencies of the British House of Commons were revised in the light of major shifts in population since the previous redistribution of seats. A massive proportion—nearly 90 percent—of the parliamentary constituencies were changed in some way. In this analysis of the 1983 redistribution, we examine why some constituencies have so many more people than others. Our models include a variety of independent variables impinging upon “redistribution biases”—country (England, Scotland, Wales), rounding error in assigning seats, population density, and the dominant political party in constituencies. All these variables are found to play a part in the decisions of the boundary commissions. However, although “political” in certain ways, we detected no significant direct partisan influences in the 1983 redistribution of seats.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)992-1005
Number of pages14
JournalThe Journal of Politics
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1986

Fingerprint

redistribution
population density

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Representing A Territory : Constituency Boundaries for the British House of Commons of the 1980 s. / Hibbing, John R; Patterson, Samuel C.

In: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 48, No. 4, 11.1986, p. 992-1005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a767f91ec8b145bca3e68d6c58d6eeff,
title = "Representing A Territory: Constituency Boundaries for the British House of Commons of the 1980 s",
abstract = "In 1983, the boundary lines for constituencies of the British House of Commons were revised in the light of major shifts in population since the previous redistribution of seats. A massive proportion—nearly 90 percent—of the parliamentary constituencies were changed in some way. In this analysis of the 1983 redistribution, we examine why some constituencies have so many more people than others. Our models include a variety of independent variables impinging upon “redistribution biases”—country (England, Scotland, Wales), rounding error in assigning seats, population density, and the dominant political party in constituencies. All these variables are found to play a part in the decisions of the boundary commissions. However, although “political” in certain ways, we detected no significant direct partisan influences in the 1983 redistribution of seats.",
author = "Hibbing, {John R} and Patterson, {Samuel C.}",
year = "1986",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2307/2131009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "992--1005",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing A Territory

T2 - Constituency Boundaries for the British House of Commons of the 1980 s

AU - Hibbing, John R

AU - Patterson, Samuel C.

PY - 1986/11

Y1 - 1986/11

N2 - In 1983, the boundary lines for constituencies of the British House of Commons were revised in the light of major shifts in population since the previous redistribution of seats. A massive proportion—nearly 90 percent—of the parliamentary constituencies were changed in some way. In this analysis of the 1983 redistribution, we examine why some constituencies have so many more people than others. Our models include a variety of independent variables impinging upon “redistribution biases”—country (England, Scotland, Wales), rounding error in assigning seats, population density, and the dominant political party in constituencies. All these variables are found to play a part in the decisions of the boundary commissions. However, although “political” in certain ways, we detected no significant direct partisan influences in the 1983 redistribution of seats.

AB - In 1983, the boundary lines for constituencies of the British House of Commons were revised in the light of major shifts in population since the previous redistribution of seats. A massive proportion—nearly 90 percent—of the parliamentary constituencies were changed in some way. In this analysis of the 1983 redistribution, we examine why some constituencies have so many more people than others. Our models include a variety of independent variables impinging upon “redistribution biases”—country (England, Scotland, Wales), rounding error in assigning seats, population density, and the dominant political party in constituencies. All these variables are found to play a part in the decisions of the boundary commissions. However, although “political” in certain ways, we detected no significant direct partisan influences in the 1983 redistribution of seats.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974220379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974220379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2131009

DO - 10.2307/2131009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84974220379

VL - 48

SP - 992

EP - 1005

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -