Reporting Practices of Journal Articles that Include Interviews with Extremists

Daniel J. Harris, Pete Simi, Ginamarie S Ligon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. To date, there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists. After content analyzing 48 articles involving such interviews, we found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are made with regard to enhancing methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-616
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in Conflict and Terrorism
Volume39
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

Transparency
transparency
interview
radicalism
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

Reporting Practices of Journal Articles that Include Interviews with Extremists. / Harris, Daniel J.; Simi, Pete; Ligon, Ginamarie S.

In: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 39, No. 7-8, 02.07.2016, p. 602-616.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bf06155d8a547bbaa88c06071374202,
title = "Reporting Practices of Journal Articles that Include Interviews with Extremists",
abstract = "The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. To date, there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists. After content analyzing 48 articles involving such interviews, we found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are made with regard to enhancing methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon.",
author = "Harris, {Daniel J.} and Pete Simi and Ligon, {Ginamarie S}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/1057610X.2016.1141009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "602--616",
journal = "Studies in Conflict and Terrorism",
issn = "1057-610X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting Practices of Journal Articles that Include Interviews with Extremists

AU - Harris, Daniel J.

AU - Simi, Pete

AU - Ligon, Ginamarie S

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. To date, there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists. After content analyzing 48 articles involving such interviews, we found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are made with regard to enhancing methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon.

AB - The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. To date, there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists. After content analyzing 48 articles involving such interviews, we found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are made with regard to enhancing methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964054051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964054051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1057610X.2016.1141009

DO - 10.1080/1057610X.2016.1141009

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 602

EP - 616

JO - Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

JF - Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

SN - 1057-610X

IS - 7-8

ER -