Reply to Comment on "Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties" by S. Christensen

Xunhong Chen, Xi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The study of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion parameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734], based on the solution of Hunt [Hunt, B., 1999. Unsteady stream depletion from groundwater pumping. Ground Water 37 (1), 98-102], analyzed three streamflow depletion parameters T, S, and λ of a simplified stream-aquifer system. Although such a stream-aquifer hydrologic condition does not commonly exist in the real world, Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] concluded that his results can be used to analyze any hydrogeological setting and his proposed methodology can analyze any possible pumping test design. Stream-aquifer-well systems are far more complex in the real world: lack of a semipervious layer that covers the whole stream channel, anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of stream sediments and the surrounding aquifers, effects of multiple channels or stream width, etc. It is clear that the results of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] have limitations in the analyses of streamflow depletion parameters. It is then very apparent and logical that further research on streamflow depletion parameters for a more complex stream-aquifer system and for a less ideal design of pumping and observation well network is needed. Chen and Chen [Chen, X.H., Chen, X., 2003a. Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 284, 270-284] used numerical models to simulate stream-aquifer interactions and fullfilled at least part of this need. The study of realistic and complex stream-aquifer-well conditions on streamflow depletion parameters remains an important topic of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-327
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume303
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

stream channels
hydraulic property
aquifers
sensitivity analysis
stream flow
fluid mechanics
streamflow
aquifer
groundwater
drawdown
pumping
stream channel
fluvial deposit
hydraulic conductivity
hydrology
parameter
well
methodology
sediments
analysis

Keywords

  • Hydraulic parameters
  • Pumping test
  • Sensitivity analysis
  • Stream-aquifer interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Reply to Comment on "Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties" by S. Christensen. / Chen, Xunhong; Chen, Xi.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 303, No. 1-4, 01.03.2005, p. 322-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{82d97db062f74b24a59d1377acedcfd5,
title = "Reply to Comment on {"}Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties{"} by S. Christensen",
abstract = "The study of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion parameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734], based on the solution of Hunt [Hunt, B., 1999. Unsteady stream depletion from groundwater pumping. Ground Water 37 (1), 98-102], analyzed three streamflow depletion parameters T, S, and λ of a simplified stream-aquifer system. Although such a stream-aquifer hydrologic condition does not commonly exist in the real world, Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] concluded that his results can be used to analyze any hydrogeological setting and his proposed methodology can analyze any possible pumping test design. Stream-aquifer-well systems are far more complex in the real world: lack of a semipervious layer that covers the whole stream channel, anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of stream sediments and the surrounding aquifers, effects of multiple channels or stream width, etc. It is clear that the results of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] have limitations in the analyses of streamflow depletion parameters. It is then very apparent and logical that further research on streamflow depletion parameters for a more complex stream-aquifer system and for a less ideal design of pumping and observation well network is needed. Chen and Chen [Chen, X.H., Chen, X., 2003a. Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 284, 270-284] used numerical models to simulate stream-aquifer interactions and fullfilled at least part of this need. The study of realistic and complex stream-aquifer-well conditions on streamflow depletion parameters remains an important topic of research.",
keywords = "Hydraulic parameters, Pumping test, Sensitivity analysis, Stream-aquifer interactions",
author = "Xunhong Chen and Xi Chen",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "303",
pages = "322--327",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comment on "Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties" by S. Christensen

AU - Chen, Xunhong

AU - Chen, Xi

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - The study of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion parameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734], based on the solution of Hunt [Hunt, B., 1999. Unsteady stream depletion from groundwater pumping. Ground Water 37 (1), 98-102], analyzed three streamflow depletion parameters T, S, and λ of a simplified stream-aquifer system. Although such a stream-aquifer hydrologic condition does not commonly exist in the real world, Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] concluded that his results can be used to analyze any hydrogeological setting and his proposed methodology can analyze any possible pumping test design. Stream-aquifer-well systems are far more complex in the real world: lack of a semipervious layer that covers the whole stream channel, anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of stream sediments and the surrounding aquifers, effects of multiple channels or stream width, etc. It is clear that the results of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] have limitations in the analyses of streamflow depletion parameters. It is then very apparent and logical that further research on streamflow depletion parameters for a more complex stream-aquifer system and for a less ideal design of pumping and observation well network is needed. Chen and Chen [Chen, X.H., Chen, X., 2003a. Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 284, 270-284] used numerical models to simulate stream-aquifer interactions and fullfilled at least part of this need. The study of realistic and complex stream-aquifer-well conditions on streamflow depletion parameters remains an important topic of research.

AB - The study of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion parameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734], based on the solution of Hunt [Hunt, B., 1999. Unsteady stream depletion from groundwater pumping. Ground Water 37 (1), 98-102], analyzed three streamflow depletion parameters T, S, and λ of a simplified stream-aquifer system. Although such a stream-aquifer hydrologic condition does not commonly exist in the real world, Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] concluded that his results can be used to analyze any hydrogeological setting and his proposed methodology can analyze any possible pumping test design. Stream-aquifer-well systems are far more complex in the real world: lack of a semipervious layer that covers the whole stream channel, anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of stream sediments and the surrounding aquifers, effects of multiple channels or stream width, etc. It is clear that the results of Christensen [Christensen, S., 2000. On the estimation of stream flow depletion prameters by drawdown analysis. Ground Water 38 (5), 726-734] have limitations in the analyses of streamflow depletion parameters. It is then very apparent and logical that further research on streamflow depletion parameters for a more complex stream-aquifer system and for a less ideal design of pumping and observation well network is needed. Chen and Chen [Chen, X.H., Chen, X., 2003a. Sensitivity analysis and determination of streambed leakance and aquifer hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 284, 270-284] used numerical models to simulate stream-aquifer interactions and fullfilled at least part of this need. The study of realistic and complex stream-aquifer-well conditions on streamflow depletion parameters remains an important topic of research.

KW - Hydraulic parameters

KW - Pumping test

KW - Sensitivity analysis

KW - Stream-aquifer interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644423957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14644423957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.024

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:14644423957

VL - 303

SP - 322

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

IS - 1-4

ER -