Repeated measurements of spatial ability with the Manikin test

R. Carter, J. Woldstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A task reflecting spatial ability, the Manikin Test, was examined for parallelism of repeated measurements. (Only parallel test scores are suitable for repeated measurement of human performance). The results bear on some theories of individual differences. Egan's theory that latency scores reflect spatial ability (whereas accuracy scores reflect something else) was supported, as was Jones's theory that individual differences stabilize with practice. The hypothesis of Baron and Treiman, that skill transfers between tests of the same ability, was not supported. The results illustrate the principle that not all tasks and scores are useful for repeated measures. The Manikin Test log latency score was shown to be suitable for repeated-measures applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-219
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Factors
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1985

Fingerprint

Manikins
Individuality
Aptitude
ability
Spatial Navigation
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Repeated measurements of spatial ability with the Manikin test. / Carter, R.; Woldstad, J.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.01.1985, p. 209-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carter, R. ; Woldstad, J. / Repeated measurements of spatial ability with the Manikin test. In: Human Factors. 1985 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 209-219.
@article{1d082c8f1ac248a6a894c6238b4d3783,
title = "Repeated measurements of spatial ability with the Manikin test",
abstract = "A task reflecting spatial ability, the Manikin Test, was examined for parallelism of repeated measurements. (Only parallel test scores are suitable for repeated measurement of human performance). The results bear on some theories of individual differences. Egan's theory that latency scores reflect spatial ability (whereas accuracy scores reflect something else) was supported, as was Jones's theory that individual differences stabilize with practice. The hypothesis of Baron and Treiman, that skill transfers between tests of the same ability, was not supported. The results illustrate the principle that not all tasks and scores are useful for repeated measures. The Manikin Test log latency score was shown to be suitable for repeated-measures applications.",
author = "R. Carter and J. Woldstad",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/001872088502700208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "209--219",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeated measurements of spatial ability with the Manikin test

AU - Carter, R.

AU - Woldstad, J.

PY - 1985/1/1

Y1 - 1985/1/1

N2 - A task reflecting spatial ability, the Manikin Test, was examined for parallelism of repeated measurements. (Only parallel test scores are suitable for repeated measurement of human performance). The results bear on some theories of individual differences. Egan's theory that latency scores reflect spatial ability (whereas accuracy scores reflect something else) was supported, as was Jones's theory that individual differences stabilize with practice. The hypothesis of Baron and Treiman, that skill transfers between tests of the same ability, was not supported. The results illustrate the principle that not all tasks and scores are useful for repeated measures. The Manikin Test log latency score was shown to be suitable for repeated-measures applications.

AB - A task reflecting spatial ability, the Manikin Test, was examined for parallelism of repeated measurements. (Only parallel test scores are suitable for repeated measurement of human performance). The results bear on some theories of individual differences. Egan's theory that latency scores reflect spatial ability (whereas accuracy scores reflect something else) was supported, as was Jones's theory that individual differences stabilize with practice. The hypothesis of Baron and Treiman, that skill transfers between tests of the same ability, was not supported. The results illustrate the principle that not all tasks and scores are useful for repeated measures. The Manikin Test log latency score was shown to be suitable for repeated-measures applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022043606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022043606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872088502700208

DO - 10.1177/001872088502700208

M3 - Article

C2 - 4018813

AN - SCOPUS:0022043606

VL - 27

SP - 209

EP - 219

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 2

ER -