Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude

Trent J. Herda, Joseph P. Weir, Eric D. Ryan, Ashley A. Walter, Pablo B. Costa, Katherine M. Hoge, Travis W. Beck, Jeffrey R. Stout, Joel T. Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the test-retest reliability of the slopes (b) and y-intercepts (a) of the absolute and log-transformed regression models applied to the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) versus torque (TQ) relationship. Fifteen participants (mean ± SD age = 23 ± 4 yrs) performed two isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and ten randomly ordered isometric leg extensions from 5% to 95% of their MVC during three separate trials. MMGRMS was recorded from the vastus lateralis during each MVC. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs) were calculated for test-retest reliability. ICCs for the b and a terms were 0.89 and 0.90 for the log-transformed and 0.85 and 0.76 for the absolute relationships, respectively. The SEM values (expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the b and a terms were 9.7% and 16.4% for the log-transformed and 18.9% and 57.1% for the absolute relationships, respectively. These results indicated that the b and a terms from both the absolute linear and log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships were relatively reliable (ICCs), however, the SEMs for the log-transformed relationships were lower than the absolute linear models. Furthermore, the b term from the log-transformed relationships may provide unique information regarding the nonlinear characteristics (plateau points) of the MMGRMS versus TQ relationship, whereas the a term may indicate upward or downward shifts in MMGRMS across the TQ spectrum. Thus, the log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships may offer an attractive alternative method for reliably quantifying and tracking changes in the TQ-related patterns of response for MMGRMS on a subject-by-subject basis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-246
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume179
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2009

Fingerprint

Torque
Reproducibility of Results
Quadriceps Muscle
Linear Models
Leg

Keywords

  • MMG
  • Step contraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude. / Herda, Trent J.; Weir, Joseph P.; Ryan, Eric D.; Walter, Ashley A.; Costa, Pablo B.; Hoge, Katherine M.; Beck, Travis W.; Stout, Jeffrey R.; Cramer, Joel T.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 179, No. 2, 15.05.2009, p. 240-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herda, Trent J. ; Weir, Joseph P. ; Ryan, Eric D. ; Walter, Ashley A. ; Costa, Pablo B. ; Hoge, Katherine M. ; Beck, Travis W. ; Stout, Jeffrey R. ; Cramer, Joel T. / Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude. In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2009 ; Vol. 179, No. 2. pp. 240-246.
@article{a509f8cf4bc849ba975f322b51a3849b,
title = "Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude",
abstract = "This study examined the test-retest reliability of the slopes (b) and y-intercepts (a) of the absolute and log-transformed regression models applied to the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) versus torque (TQ) relationship. Fifteen participants (mean ± SD age = 23 ± 4 yrs) performed two isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and ten randomly ordered isometric leg extensions from 5{\%} to 95{\%} of their MVC during three separate trials. MMGRMS was recorded from the vastus lateralis during each MVC. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs) were calculated for test-retest reliability. ICCs for the b and a terms were 0.89 and 0.90 for the log-transformed and 0.85 and 0.76 for the absolute relationships, respectively. The SEM values (expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the b and a terms were 9.7{\%} and 16.4{\%} for the log-transformed and 18.9{\%} and 57.1{\%} for the absolute relationships, respectively. These results indicated that the b and a terms from both the absolute linear and log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships were relatively reliable (ICCs), however, the SEMs for the log-transformed relationships were lower than the absolute linear models. Furthermore, the b term from the log-transformed relationships may provide unique information regarding the nonlinear characteristics (plateau points) of the MMGRMS versus TQ relationship, whereas the a term may indicate upward or downward shifts in MMGRMS across the TQ spectrum. Thus, the log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships may offer an attractive alternative method for reliably quantifying and tracking changes in the TQ-related patterns of response for MMGRMS on a subject-by-subject basis.",
keywords = "MMG, Step contraction",
author = "Herda, {Trent J.} and Weir, {Joseph P.} and Ryan, {Eric D.} and Walter, {Ashley A.} and Costa, {Pablo B.} and Hoge, {Katherine M.} and Beck, {Travis W.} and Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Cramer, {Joel T.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "179",
pages = "240--246",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude

AU - Herda, Trent J.

AU - Weir, Joseph P.

AU - Ryan, Eric D.

AU - Walter, Ashley A.

AU - Costa, Pablo B.

AU - Hoge, Katherine M.

AU - Beck, Travis W.

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Cramer, Joel T.

PY - 2009/5/15

Y1 - 2009/5/15

N2 - This study examined the test-retest reliability of the slopes (b) and y-intercepts (a) of the absolute and log-transformed regression models applied to the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) versus torque (TQ) relationship. Fifteen participants (mean ± SD age = 23 ± 4 yrs) performed two isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and ten randomly ordered isometric leg extensions from 5% to 95% of their MVC during three separate trials. MMGRMS was recorded from the vastus lateralis during each MVC. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs) were calculated for test-retest reliability. ICCs for the b and a terms were 0.89 and 0.90 for the log-transformed and 0.85 and 0.76 for the absolute relationships, respectively. The SEM values (expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the b and a terms were 9.7% and 16.4% for the log-transformed and 18.9% and 57.1% for the absolute relationships, respectively. These results indicated that the b and a terms from both the absolute linear and log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships were relatively reliable (ICCs), however, the SEMs for the log-transformed relationships were lower than the absolute linear models. Furthermore, the b term from the log-transformed relationships may provide unique information regarding the nonlinear characteristics (plateau points) of the MMGRMS versus TQ relationship, whereas the a term may indicate upward or downward shifts in MMGRMS across the TQ spectrum. Thus, the log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships may offer an attractive alternative method for reliably quantifying and tracking changes in the TQ-related patterns of response for MMGRMS on a subject-by-subject basis.

AB - This study examined the test-retest reliability of the slopes (b) and y-intercepts (a) of the absolute and log-transformed regression models applied to the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMGRMS) versus torque (TQ) relationship. Fifteen participants (mean ± SD age = 23 ± 4 yrs) performed two isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and ten randomly ordered isometric leg extensions from 5% to 95% of their MVC during three separate trials. MMGRMS was recorded from the vastus lateralis during each MVC. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs) were calculated for test-retest reliability. ICCs for the b and a terms were 0.89 and 0.90 for the log-transformed and 0.85 and 0.76 for the absolute relationships, respectively. The SEM values (expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the b and a terms were 9.7% and 16.4% for the log-transformed and 18.9% and 57.1% for the absolute relationships, respectively. These results indicated that the b and a terms from both the absolute linear and log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships were relatively reliable (ICCs), however, the SEMs for the log-transformed relationships were lower than the absolute linear models. Furthermore, the b term from the log-transformed relationships may provide unique information regarding the nonlinear characteristics (plateau points) of the MMGRMS versus TQ relationship, whereas the a term may indicate upward or downward shifts in MMGRMS across the TQ spectrum. Thus, the log-transformed MMGRMS versus TQ relationships may offer an attractive alternative method for reliably quantifying and tracking changes in the TQ-related patterns of response for MMGRMS on a subject-by-subject basis.

KW - MMG

KW - Step contraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63049083847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63049083847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 19428533

AN - SCOPUS:63049083847

VL - 179

SP - 240

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

IS - 2

ER -