Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology

Kristen D. Deppe, Frank J. Gonzalez, Jayme L. Neiman, Carly Jacobs, Jackson Pahlke, Kevin B. Smith, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research finds that liberals and conservatives process information differently. Predispositions toward intuitive versus reflective thinking may help explain this individual level variation. There have been few direct tests of this hypothesis and the results from the handful of studies that do exist are contradictory. Here we report the results of a series of studies using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to investigate inclinations to be reflective and political orientation. We find a relationship between thinking style and political orientation and that these effects are particularly concentrated on social attitudes. We also find it harder to manipulate intuitive and reflective thinking than a number of prominent studies suggest. Priming manipulations used to induce reflection and intuition in published articles repeatedly fail in our studies. We conclude that conservatives— more specifically, social conservatives—tend to be dispositionally less reflective, social liberals tend to be dispositionally more reflective, and that the relationship between reflection and intuition and political attitudes may be more resistant to easy manipulation than existing research would suggest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-331
Number of pages18
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Intuition
Research
Thinking
Ideology
Manipulation
Priming
Thinking styles
Political attitudes

Keywords

  • Cognitive reflection test
  • Ideology
  • Political attitudes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 314-331.

Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives : A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology. / Deppe, Kristen D.; Gonzalez, Frank J.; Neiman, Jayme L.; Jacobs, Carly; Pahlke, Jackson; Smith, Kevin B.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 314-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deppe, KD, Gonzalez, FJ, Neiman, JL, Jacobs, C, Pahlke, J, Smith, KB & Hibbing, JR 2015, 'Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology', Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 314-331.
Deppe KD, Gonzalez FJ, Neiman JL, Jacobs C, Pahlke J, Smith KB et al. Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology. Judgment and Decision Making. 2015 Jul 1;10(4):314-331.
Deppe, Kristen D. ; Gonzalez, Frank J. ; Neiman, Jayme L. ; Jacobs, Carly ; Pahlke, Jackson ; Smith, Kevin B. ; Hibbing, John R. / Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives : A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology. In: Judgment and Decision Making. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 314-331.
@article{6570f891ac0347ce87ea0d110cbbe4d6,
title = "Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology",
abstract = "Prior research finds that liberals and conservatives process information differently. Predispositions toward intuitive versus reflective thinking may help explain this individual level variation. There have been few direct tests of this hypothesis and the results from the handful of studies that do exist are contradictory. Here we report the results of a series of studies using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to investigate inclinations to be reflective and political orientation. We find a relationship between thinking style and political orientation and that these effects are particularly concentrated on social attitudes. We also find it harder to manipulate intuitive and reflective thinking than a number of prominent studies suggest. Priming manipulations used to induce reflection and intuition in published articles repeatedly fail in our studies. We conclude that conservatives— more specifically, social conservatives—tend to be dispositionally less reflective, social liberals tend to be dispositionally more reflective, and that the relationship between reflection and intuition and political attitudes may be more resistant to easy manipulation than existing research would suggest.",
keywords = "Cognitive reflection test, Ideology, Political attitudes",
author = "Deppe, {Kristen D.} and Gonzalez, {Frank J.} and Neiman, {Jayme L.} and Carly Jacobs and Jackson Pahlke and Smith, {Kevin B.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "314--331",
journal = "Judgment and Decision Making",
issn = "1930-2975",
publisher = "Society for Judgment and Decision Making",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives

T2 - A look at the cognitive reflection test and ideology

AU - Deppe, Kristen D.

AU - Gonzalez, Frank J.

AU - Neiman, Jayme L.

AU - Jacobs, Carly

AU - Pahlke, Jackson

AU - Smith, Kevin B.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Prior research finds that liberals and conservatives process information differently. Predispositions toward intuitive versus reflective thinking may help explain this individual level variation. There have been few direct tests of this hypothesis and the results from the handful of studies that do exist are contradictory. Here we report the results of a series of studies using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to investigate inclinations to be reflective and political orientation. We find a relationship between thinking style and political orientation and that these effects are particularly concentrated on social attitudes. We also find it harder to manipulate intuitive and reflective thinking than a number of prominent studies suggest. Priming manipulations used to induce reflection and intuition in published articles repeatedly fail in our studies. We conclude that conservatives— more specifically, social conservatives—tend to be dispositionally less reflective, social liberals tend to be dispositionally more reflective, and that the relationship between reflection and intuition and political attitudes may be more resistant to easy manipulation than existing research would suggest.

AB - Prior research finds that liberals and conservatives process information differently. Predispositions toward intuitive versus reflective thinking may help explain this individual level variation. There have been few direct tests of this hypothesis and the results from the handful of studies that do exist are contradictory. Here we report the results of a series of studies using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to investigate inclinations to be reflective and political orientation. We find a relationship between thinking style and political orientation and that these effects are particularly concentrated on social attitudes. We also find it harder to manipulate intuitive and reflective thinking than a number of prominent studies suggest. Priming manipulations used to induce reflection and intuition in published articles repeatedly fail in our studies. We conclude that conservatives— more specifically, social conservatives—tend to be dispositionally less reflective, social liberals tend to be dispositionally more reflective, and that the relationship between reflection and intuition and political attitudes may be more resistant to easy manipulation than existing research would suggest.

KW - Cognitive reflection test

KW - Ideology

KW - Political attitudes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938530620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938530620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938530620

VL - 10

SP - 314

EP - 331

JO - Judgment and Decision Making

JF - Judgment and Decision Making

SN - 1930-2975

IS - 4

ER -