Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location

Monita Chatterjee, Aditya M. Kulkarni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychophysical recovery from forward masking was measured in adult cochlear implant users of CochlearTM and Advanced BionicsTM devices, in monopolar and in focused (bipolar and tripolar) stimulation modes, at four electrode sites across the arrays, and at two levels (loudness balanced across modes and electrodes). Results indicated a steeper psychophysical recovery from forward masking in monopolar over bipolar and tripolar modes, modified by differential effects of electrode and level. The interactions between factors varied somewhat across devices. It is speculated that psychophysical recovery from forward masking may be driven by different populations of neurons in the different modes, with a broader stimulation pattern resulting in a greater likelihood of response by healthier and/or faster-recovering neurons within the stimulated population. If a more rapid recovery from prior stimulation reflects responses of neurons not necessarily close to the activating site, the spectral pattern of the incoming acoustic signal may be distorted. These results have implications for speech processor implementations using different degrees of focusing of the electric field. The primary differences in the shape of the recovery function were observed in the earlier portion (between 2 and 45 ms) of recovery, which is significant in terms of the speech envelope.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3190-3202
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume141
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

masking
stimulation
recovery
electrodes
neurons
loudness
central processing units
Stimulation
Recovery
Masking
Cochlear Implant
Listeners
envelopes
acoustics
electric fields
Neuron
Psychophysical
interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location. / Chatterjee, Monita; Kulkarni, Aditya M.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 141, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 3190-3202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96e61b2b97654684879cbeccc7f4b686,
title = "Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location",
abstract = "Psychophysical recovery from forward masking was measured in adult cochlear implant users of CochlearTM and Advanced BionicsTM devices, in monopolar and in focused (bipolar and tripolar) stimulation modes, at four electrode sites across the arrays, and at two levels (loudness balanced across modes and electrodes). Results indicated a steeper psychophysical recovery from forward masking in monopolar over bipolar and tripolar modes, modified by differential effects of electrode and level. The interactions between factors varied somewhat across devices. It is speculated that psychophysical recovery from forward masking may be driven by different populations of neurons in the different modes, with a broader stimulation pattern resulting in a greater likelihood of response by healthier and/or faster-recovering neurons within the stimulated population. If a more rapid recovery from prior stimulation reflects responses of neurons not necessarily close to the activating site, the spectral pattern of the incoming acoustic signal may be distorted. These results have implications for speech processor implementations using different degrees of focusing of the electric field. The primary differences in the shape of the recovery function were observed in the earlier portion (between 2 and 45 ms) of recovery, which is significant in terms of the speech envelope.",
author = "Monita Chatterjee and Kulkarni, {Aditya M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.4983156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "3190--3202",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location

AU - Chatterjee, Monita

AU - Kulkarni, Aditya M.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Psychophysical recovery from forward masking was measured in adult cochlear implant users of CochlearTM and Advanced BionicsTM devices, in monopolar and in focused (bipolar and tripolar) stimulation modes, at four electrode sites across the arrays, and at two levels (loudness balanced across modes and electrodes). Results indicated a steeper psychophysical recovery from forward masking in monopolar over bipolar and tripolar modes, modified by differential effects of electrode and level. The interactions between factors varied somewhat across devices. It is speculated that psychophysical recovery from forward masking may be driven by different populations of neurons in the different modes, with a broader stimulation pattern resulting in a greater likelihood of response by healthier and/or faster-recovering neurons within the stimulated population. If a more rapid recovery from prior stimulation reflects responses of neurons not necessarily close to the activating site, the spectral pattern of the incoming acoustic signal may be distorted. These results have implications for speech processor implementations using different degrees of focusing of the electric field. The primary differences in the shape of the recovery function were observed in the earlier portion (between 2 and 45 ms) of recovery, which is significant in terms of the speech envelope.

AB - Psychophysical recovery from forward masking was measured in adult cochlear implant users of CochlearTM and Advanced BionicsTM devices, in monopolar and in focused (bipolar and tripolar) stimulation modes, at four electrode sites across the arrays, and at two levels (loudness balanced across modes and electrodes). Results indicated a steeper psychophysical recovery from forward masking in monopolar over bipolar and tripolar modes, modified by differential effects of electrode and level. The interactions between factors varied somewhat across devices. It is speculated that psychophysical recovery from forward masking may be driven by different populations of neurons in the different modes, with a broader stimulation pattern resulting in a greater likelihood of response by healthier and/or faster-recovering neurons within the stimulated population. If a more rapid recovery from prior stimulation reflects responses of neurons not necessarily close to the activating site, the spectral pattern of the incoming acoustic signal may be distorted. These results have implications for speech processor implementations using different degrees of focusing of the electric field. The primary differences in the shape of the recovery function were observed in the earlier portion (between 2 and 45 ms) of recovery, which is significant in terms of the speech envelope.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021292793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021292793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4983156

DO - 10.1121/1.4983156

M3 - Article

C2 - 28682084

AN - SCOPUS:85021292793

VL - 141

SP - 3190

EP - 3202

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

ER -