Reconsideration of the use of peer sociometrics for evaluating social- skills training: Implications of an idiographic assessment of temporal stability

David J Hansen, Douglas W. Nangle, James T. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social-skills training studies using sociometric procedures as dependent measures have often yielded mixed results as to the improvement of the subjects. Failure to document improvement in peer acceptance subsequent to behavior change has led some to question the validity of social-skills interventions, whereas others have questioned the psychometric properties of the measures themselves. This study examined the temporal stability of the two major types of peer measures used in social-skills interventions studies: peer-nomination measures of liking and peer-rating measures of liking. Subjects were 87 children in three fourth-grade and two fifth-grade classrooms. Temporal stability was assessed across time intervals of 2,6, and 8 weeks. Temporal stability was examined as it traditionally has been at the group level (using Pearson product-moment correlations), and at the level at which data are normally examined for change in social-skills interventions, at the level of the individual child (using phi and Cramer's V coefficients). Assessed at the group level, the three types of peer measures were generally moderately to highly stable. Stability coefficients for individual children's scores on the peer measures, however, indicated instability at the level of the individual child. These problems regarding stability at the individual, idiographic level may be especially relevant when sociometric procedures are used as dependent measures in individual subject design studies. Conceptual and practical implications of the findings for the assessment of social- skills interventions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-299
Number of pages19
JournalBehavior Modification
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1996

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Social Skills
Peers
Time Interval
Rating
Acceptance
Nomination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reconsideration of the use of peer sociometrics for evaluating social- skills training : Implications of an idiographic assessment of temporal stability. / Hansen, David J; Nangle, Douglas W.; Ellis, James T.

In: Behavior Modification, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.07.1996, p. 281-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77d98d16aa6a4151a3937e5b55672cf0,
title = "Reconsideration of the use of peer sociometrics for evaluating social- skills training: Implications of an idiographic assessment of temporal stability",
abstract = "Social-skills training studies using sociometric procedures as dependent measures have often yielded mixed results as to the improvement of the subjects. Failure to document improvement in peer acceptance subsequent to behavior change has led some to question the validity of social-skills interventions, whereas others have questioned the psychometric properties of the measures themselves. This study examined the temporal stability of the two major types of peer measures used in social-skills interventions studies: peer-nomination measures of liking and peer-rating measures of liking. Subjects were 87 children in three fourth-grade and two fifth-grade classrooms. Temporal stability was assessed across time intervals of 2,6, and 8 weeks. Temporal stability was examined as it traditionally has been at the group level (using Pearson product-moment correlations), and at the level at which data are normally examined for change in social-skills interventions, at the level of the individual child (using phi and Cramer's V coefficients). Assessed at the group level, the three types of peer measures were generally moderately to highly stable. Stability coefficients for individual children's scores on the peer measures, however, indicated instability at the level of the individual child. These problems regarding stability at the individual, idiographic level may be especially relevant when sociometric procedures are used as dependent measures in individual subject design studies. Conceptual and practical implications of the findings for the assessment of social- skills interventions are discussed.",
author = "Hansen, {David J} and Nangle, {Douglas W.} and Ellis, {James T.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/01454455960203003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "281--299",
journal = "Behavior Modification",
issn = "0145-4455",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsideration of the use of peer sociometrics for evaluating social- skills training

T2 - Implications of an idiographic assessment of temporal stability

AU - Hansen, David J

AU - Nangle, Douglas W.

AU - Ellis, James T.

PY - 1996/7/1

Y1 - 1996/7/1

N2 - Social-skills training studies using sociometric procedures as dependent measures have often yielded mixed results as to the improvement of the subjects. Failure to document improvement in peer acceptance subsequent to behavior change has led some to question the validity of social-skills interventions, whereas others have questioned the psychometric properties of the measures themselves. This study examined the temporal stability of the two major types of peer measures used in social-skills interventions studies: peer-nomination measures of liking and peer-rating measures of liking. Subjects were 87 children in three fourth-grade and two fifth-grade classrooms. Temporal stability was assessed across time intervals of 2,6, and 8 weeks. Temporal stability was examined as it traditionally has been at the group level (using Pearson product-moment correlations), and at the level at which data are normally examined for change in social-skills interventions, at the level of the individual child (using phi and Cramer's V coefficients). Assessed at the group level, the three types of peer measures were generally moderately to highly stable. Stability coefficients for individual children's scores on the peer measures, however, indicated instability at the level of the individual child. These problems regarding stability at the individual, idiographic level may be especially relevant when sociometric procedures are used as dependent measures in individual subject design studies. Conceptual and practical implications of the findings for the assessment of social- skills interventions are discussed.

AB - Social-skills training studies using sociometric procedures as dependent measures have often yielded mixed results as to the improvement of the subjects. Failure to document improvement in peer acceptance subsequent to behavior change has led some to question the validity of social-skills interventions, whereas others have questioned the psychometric properties of the measures themselves. This study examined the temporal stability of the two major types of peer measures used in social-skills interventions studies: peer-nomination measures of liking and peer-rating measures of liking. Subjects were 87 children in three fourth-grade and two fifth-grade classrooms. Temporal stability was assessed across time intervals of 2,6, and 8 weeks. Temporal stability was examined as it traditionally has been at the group level (using Pearson product-moment correlations), and at the level at which data are normally examined for change in social-skills interventions, at the level of the individual child (using phi and Cramer's V coefficients). Assessed at the group level, the three types of peer measures were generally moderately to highly stable. Stability coefficients for individual children's scores on the peer measures, however, indicated instability at the level of the individual child. These problems regarding stability at the individual, idiographic level may be especially relevant when sociometric procedures are used as dependent measures in individual subject design studies. Conceptual and practical implications of the findings for the assessment of social- skills interventions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029890544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029890544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/01454455960203003

DO - 10.1177/01454455960203003

M3 - Article

C2 - 8768509

AN - SCOPUS:0029890544

VL - 20

SP - 281

EP - 299

JO - Behavior Modification

JF - Behavior Modification

SN - 0145-4455

IS - 3

ER -