Recommendations for the assessment and reporting of multivariable logistic regression in transplantation literature

Andre C Kalil, J. Mattei, Diana F Florescu, J. Sun, R. S. Kalil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multivariable logistic regression is an important method to evaluate risk factors and prognosis in solid organ transplant literature. We aimed to assess the quality of this method in six major transplantation journals. Eleven analytical criteria and four documentation criteria were analyzed for each selected article that used logistic regression. A total of 106 studies (6%) out of 1,701 original articles used logistic regression analyses from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2006. The analytical criteria and their respective reporting percentage among the six journals were: Linearity (25%); Beta coefficient (48%); Interaction tests (19%); Main estimates (98%); Ovefitting prevention (84%); Goodnessof- fit (3.8%); Multicolinearity (4.7%); Internal validation (3.8%); External validation (8.5%). The documentation criteria were reported as follows: Selection of independent variables (73%); Coding of variables (9%); Fitting procedures (49%); Statistical program (65%). No significant differences were found among different journals or between general versus subspecialty journals with respect to reporting quality. We found that the report of logistic regression is unsatisfactory in transplantation journals. Because our findings may have major consequences for the care of transplant patients and for the design of transplant clinical trials, we recommend a practical solution for the use and reporting of logistic regression in transplantation journals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1686-1694
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

Fingerprint

Transplantation
Logistic Models
Transplants
Documentation
Patient Care
Regression Analysis
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Logistic
  • Multivariable
  • Regression
  • Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Transplantation
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Recommendations for the assessment and reporting of multivariable logistic regression in transplantation literature. / Kalil, Andre C; Mattei, J.; Florescu, Diana F; Sun, J.; Kalil, R. S.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 10, No. 7, 01.07.2010, p. 1686-1694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d568c5843d0a485e9ce8ddc954098b6b,
title = "Recommendations for the assessment and reporting of multivariable logistic regression in transplantation literature",
abstract = "Multivariable logistic regression is an important method to evaluate risk factors and prognosis in solid organ transplant literature. We aimed to assess the quality of this method in six major transplantation journals. Eleven analytical criteria and four documentation criteria were analyzed for each selected article that used logistic regression. A total of 106 studies (6{\%}) out of 1,701 original articles used logistic regression analyses from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2006. The analytical criteria and their respective reporting percentage among the six journals were: Linearity (25{\%}); Beta coefficient (48{\%}); Interaction tests (19{\%}); Main estimates (98{\%}); Ovefitting prevention (84{\%}); Goodnessof- fit (3.8{\%}); Multicolinearity (4.7{\%}); Internal validation (3.8{\%}); External validation (8.5{\%}). The documentation criteria were reported as follows: Selection of independent variables (73{\%}); Coding of variables (9{\%}); Fitting procedures (49{\%}); Statistical program (65{\%}). No significant differences were found among different journals or between general versus subspecialty journals with respect to reporting quality. We found that the report of logistic regression is unsatisfactory in transplantation journals. Because our findings may have major consequences for the care of transplant patients and for the design of transplant clinical trials, we recommend a practical solution for the use and reporting of logistic regression in transplantation journals.",
keywords = "Logistic, Multivariable, Regression, Transplantation",
author = "Kalil, {Andre C} and J. Mattei and Florescu, {Diana F} and J. Sun and Kalil, {R. S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03141.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "1686--1694",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for the assessment and reporting of multivariable logistic regression in transplantation literature

AU - Kalil, Andre C

AU - Mattei, J.

AU - Florescu, Diana F

AU - Sun, J.

AU - Kalil, R. S.

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - Multivariable logistic regression is an important method to evaluate risk factors and prognosis in solid organ transplant literature. We aimed to assess the quality of this method in six major transplantation journals. Eleven analytical criteria and four documentation criteria were analyzed for each selected article that used logistic regression. A total of 106 studies (6%) out of 1,701 original articles used logistic regression analyses from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2006. The analytical criteria and their respective reporting percentage among the six journals were: Linearity (25%); Beta coefficient (48%); Interaction tests (19%); Main estimates (98%); Ovefitting prevention (84%); Goodnessof- fit (3.8%); Multicolinearity (4.7%); Internal validation (3.8%); External validation (8.5%). The documentation criteria were reported as follows: Selection of independent variables (73%); Coding of variables (9%); Fitting procedures (49%); Statistical program (65%). No significant differences were found among different journals or between general versus subspecialty journals with respect to reporting quality. We found that the report of logistic regression is unsatisfactory in transplantation journals. Because our findings may have major consequences for the care of transplant patients and for the design of transplant clinical trials, we recommend a practical solution for the use and reporting of logistic regression in transplantation journals.

AB - Multivariable logistic regression is an important method to evaluate risk factors and prognosis in solid organ transplant literature. We aimed to assess the quality of this method in six major transplantation journals. Eleven analytical criteria and four documentation criteria were analyzed for each selected article that used logistic regression. A total of 106 studies (6%) out of 1,701 original articles used logistic regression analyses from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2006. The analytical criteria and their respective reporting percentage among the six journals were: Linearity (25%); Beta coefficient (48%); Interaction tests (19%); Main estimates (98%); Ovefitting prevention (84%); Goodnessof- fit (3.8%); Multicolinearity (4.7%); Internal validation (3.8%); External validation (8.5%). The documentation criteria were reported as follows: Selection of independent variables (73%); Coding of variables (9%); Fitting procedures (49%); Statistical program (65%). No significant differences were found among different journals or between general versus subspecialty journals with respect to reporting quality. We found that the report of logistic regression is unsatisfactory in transplantation journals. Because our findings may have major consequences for the care of transplant patients and for the design of transplant clinical trials, we recommend a practical solution for the use and reporting of logistic regression in transplantation journals.

KW - Logistic

KW - Multivariable

KW - Regression

KW - Transplantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958056125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958056125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03141.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03141.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20642690

AN - SCOPUS:79958056125

VL - 10

SP - 1686

EP - 1694

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 7

ER -