Reality versus simulation

Srilekha Srinivasan, Lance C Perez, Robert D. Palmer, David W. Brooks, Kathleen Wilson, David Fowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A systematic study of the implementation of simulation hardware (TIMS) replacing software (MATLAB) was undertaken for advanced undergraduate and early graduate courses in electrical engineering. One outcome of the qualitative component of the study was remarkable: most students interviewed (4/4 and 6/9) perceived the software simulations as "fake". Professionals, on the other hand, find such simulations as essentially perfectly replacing data from "real" systems. The implications of this large difference in perception between advanced undergraduate/early graduate students and professionals are discussed. At present, suitable theoretical frameworks related to motivation do not afford satisfactory explanation for this observation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-141
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Science Education and Technology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

Students
simulation
Electrical engineering
graduate
Computer hardware
MATLAB
electrical engineering
hardware
student
present
software

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Instructional design
  • Motivation
  • Simulation
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Srinivasan, S., Perez, L. C., Palmer, R. D., Brooks, D. W., Wilson, K., & Fowler, D. (2006). Reality versus simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5

Reality versus simulation. / Srinivasan, Srilekha; Perez, Lance C; Palmer, Robert D.; Brooks, David W.; Wilson, Kathleen; Fowler, David.

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.04.2006, p. 137-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srinivasan, S, Perez, LC, Palmer, RD, Brooks, DW, Wilson, K & Fowler, D 2006, 'Reality versus simulation', Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5
Srinivasan S, Perez LC, Palmer RD, Brooks DW, Wilson K, Fowler D. Reality versus simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2006 Apr 1;15(2):137-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5
Srinivasan, Srilekha ; Perez, Lance C ; Palmer, Robert D. ; Brooks, David W. ; Wilson, Kathleen ; Fowler, David. / Reality versus simulation. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 137-141.
@article{d95c84b56f384d90822d4bb4b412544b,
title = "Reality versus simulation",
abstract = "A systematic study of the implementation of simulation hardware (TIMS) replacing software (MATLAB) was undertaken for advanced undergraduate and early graduate courses in electrical engineering. One outcome of the qualitative component of the study was remarkable: most students interviewed (4/4 and 6/9) perceived the software simulations as {"}fake{"}. Professionals, on the other hand, find such simulations as essentially perfectly replacing data from {"}real{"} systems. The implications of this large difference in perception between advanced undergraduate/early graduate students and professionals are discussed. At present, suitable theoretical frameworks related to motivation do not afford satisfactory explanation for this observation.",
keywords = "Engineering education, Instructional design, Motivation, Simulation, Working memory",
author = "Srilekha Srinivasan and Perez, {Lance C} and Palmer, {Robert D.} and Brooks, {David W.} and Kathleen Wilson and David Fowler",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "137--141",
journal = "Journal of Science Education and Technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reality versus simulation

AU - Srinivasan, Srilekha

AU - Perez, Lance C

AU - Palmer, Robert D.

AU - Brooks, David W.

AU - Wilson, Kathleen

AU - Fowler, David

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - A systematic study of the implementation of simulation hardware (TIMS) replacing software (MATLAB) was undertaken for advanced undergraduate and early graduate courses in electrical engineering. One outcome of the qualitative component of the study was remarkable: most students interviewed (4/4 and 6/9) perceived the software simulations as "fake". Professionals, on the other hand, find such simulations as essentially perfectly replacing data from "real" systems. The implications of this large difference in perception between advanced undergraduate/early graduate students and professionals are discussed. At present, suitable theoretical frameworks related to motivation do not afford satisfactory explanation for this observation.

AB - A systematic study of the implementation of simulation hardware (TIMS) replacing software (MATLAB) was undertaken for advanced undergraduate and early graduate courses in electrical engineering. One outcome of the qualitative component of the study was remarkable: most students interviewed (4/4 and 6/9) perceived the software simulations as "fake". Professionals, on the other hand, find such simulations as essentially perfectly replacing data from "real" systems. The implications of this large difference in perception between advanced undergraduate/early graduate students and professionals are discussed. At present, suitable theoretical frameworks related to motivation do not afford satisfactory explanation for this observation.

KW - Engineering education

KW - Instructional design

KW - Motivation

KW - Simulation

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749256284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749256284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5

DO - 10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749256284

VL - 15

SP - 137

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology

JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 2

ER -