Reactions to the implicit association test as an educational tool

A mixed methods study

Amy L. Hillard, Carey S. Ryan, Sarah J Gervais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined reactions to the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT), which has been widely used but rarely examined as an educational tool to raise awareness about racial bias. College students (N=172) were assigned to read that the IAT reflected either personal beliefs or both personal and extrapersonal factors (single vs. multiple explanation conditions). They then completed the IAT and quantitative measures of affect, attitudes, and belief in bias. A subset of participants (n=32) also wrote reaction papers, which were used to develop qualitative themes to more fully describe reactions to the IAT. Quantitative results revealed that participants with a stronger implicit preference for European Americans more strongly believed in implicit bias in the multiple (vs. single) explanation condition. Mixed methods analyses using data transformation and typology development indicated that participants whose qualitative IAT responses were more negative were subsequently more likely to help an African American.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-516
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Psychology of Education
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Racism
African Americans
Students
trend
typology
student

Keywords

  • Diversity training
  • Implicit bias
  • Mixed methods
  • Prejudice reduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Reactions to the implicit association test as an educational tool : A mixed methods study. / Hillard, Amy L.; Ryan, Carey S.; Gervais, Sarah J.

In: Social Psychology of Education, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 495-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61ab0479d536441fbaa17e8b4f30b324,
title = "Reactions to the implicit association test as an educational tool: A mixed methods study",
abstract = "We examined reactions to the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT), which has been widely used but rarely examined as an educational tool to raise awareness about racial bias. College students (N=172) were assigned to read that the IAT reflected either personal beliefs or both personal and extrapersonal factors (single vs. multiple explanation conditions). They then completed the IAT and quantitative measures of affect, attitudes, and belief in bias. A subset of participants (n=32) also wrote reaction papers, which were used to develop qualitative themes to more fully describe reactions to the IAT. Quantitative results revealed that participants with a stronger implicit preference for European Americans more strongly believed in implicit bias in the multiple (vs. single) explanation condition. Mixed methods analyses using data transformation and typology development indicated that participants whose qualitative IAT responses were more negative were subsequently more likely to help an African American.",
keywords = "Diversity training, Implicit bias, Mixed methods, Prejudice reduction",
author = "Hillard, {Amy L.} and Ryan, {Carey S.} and Gervais, {Sarah J}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11218-013-9219-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "495--516",
journal = "Social Psychology of Education",
issn = "1381-2890",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactions to the implicit association test as an educational tool

T2 - A mixed methods study

AU - Hillard, Amy L.

AU - Ryan, Carey S.

AU - Gervais, Sarah J

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - We examined reactions to the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT), which has been widely used but rarely examined as an educational tool to raise awareness about racial bias. College students (N=172) were assigned to read that the IAT reflected either personal beliefs or both personal and extrapersonal factors (single vs. multiple explanation conditions). They then completed the IAT and quantitative measures of affect, attitudes, and belief in bias. A subset of participants (n=32) also wrote reaction papers, which were used to develop qualitative themes to more fully describe reactions to the IAT. Quantitative results revealed that participants with a stronger implicit preference for European Americans more strongly believed in implicit bias in the multiple (vs. single) explanation condition. Mixed methods analyses using data transformation and typology development indicated that participants whose qualitative IAT responses were more negative were subsequently more likely to help an African American.

AB - We examined reactions to the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT), which has been widely used but rarely examined as an educational tool to raise awareness about racial bias. College students (N=172) were assigned to read that the IAT reflected either personal beliefs or both personal and extrapersonal factors (single vs. multiple explanation conditions). They then completed the IAT and quantitative measures of affect, attitudes, and belief in bias. A subset of participants (n=32) also wrote reaction papers, which were used to develop qualitative themes to more fully describe reactions to the IAT. Quantitative results revealed that participants with a stronger implicit preference for European Americans more strongly believed in implicit bias in the multiple (vs. single) explanation condition. Mixed methods analyses using data transformation and typology development indicated that participants whose qualitative IAT responses were more negative were subsequently more likely to help an African American.

KW - Diversity training

KW - Implicit bias

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Prejudice reduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884153960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884153960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11218-013-9219-5

DO - 10.1007/s11218-013-9219-5

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 495

EP - 516

JO - Social Psychology of Education

JF - Social Psychology of Education

SN - 1381-2890

IS - 3

ER -