Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition

Michael D Dodd, Erin D. Sheard, Colin M. MacLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated whether re-exposure to previously studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether exposure to the critical lure at test influences memory for subsequently presented study items. In Experiment 1, immediately following each studied DRM list, participants were given a recognition test. The tests were constructed such that the number of studied items preceding the critical lure varied from zero to five. Neither false recognition for critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by this manipulation. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern of results under speeded conditions at test. Both experiments confirm that exposure to previously studied items at test does not affect true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm. This pattern strongly suggests that retrieval processes do not influence false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-126
Number of pages12
JournalMemory
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

False Recognition
Recognition (Psychology)
Experiment
DRM Paradigm
Manipulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition. / Dodd, Michael D; Sheard, Erin D.; MacLeod, Colin M.

In: Memory, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 115-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dodd, Michael D ; Sheard, Erin D. ; MacLeod, Colin M. / Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition. In: Memory. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 115-126.
@article{a653e74b4b6740a08daca629c251e33c,
title = "Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition",
abstract = "In two experiments, we investigated whether re-exposure to previously studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether exposure to the critical lure at test influences memory for subsequently presented study items. In Experiment 1, immediately following each studied DRM list, participants were given a recognition test. The tests were constructed such that the number of studied items preceding the critical lure varied from zero to five. Neither false recognition for critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by this manipulation. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern of results under speeded conditions at test. Both experiments confirm that exposure to previously studied items at test does not affect true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm. This pattern strongly suggests that retrieval processes do not influence false recognition in the DRM paradigm.",
author = "Dodd, {Michael D} and Sheard, {Erin D.} and MacLeod, {Colin M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09658210444000575",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "115--126",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition

AU - Dodd, Michael D

AU - Sheard, Erin D.

AU - MacLeod, Colin M.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In two experiments, we investigated whether re-exposure to previously studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether exposure to the critical lure at test influences memory for subsequently presented study items. In Experiment 1, immediately following each studied DRM list, participants were given a recognition test. The tests were constructed such that the number of studied items preceding the critical lure varied from zero to five. Neither false recognition for critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by this manipulation. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern of results under speeded conditions at test. Both experiments confirm that exposure to previously studied items at test does not affect true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm. This pattern strongly suggests that retrieval processes do not influence false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

AB - In two experiments, we investigated whether re-exposure to previously studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether exposure to the critical lure at test influences memory for subsequently presented study items. In Experiment 1, immediately following each studied DRM list, participants were given a recognition test. The tests were constructed such that the number of studied items preceding the critical lure varied from zero to five. Neither false recognition for critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by this manipulation. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern of results under speeded conditions at test. Both experiments confirm that exposure to previously studied items at test does not affect true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm. This pattern strongly suggests that retrieval processes do not influence false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31744444443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31744444443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658210444000575

DO - 10.1080/09658210444000575

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 115

EP - 126

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 1

ER -