RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review

Russell E. Glasgow, Samantha M. Harden, Bridget Gaglio, Borsika Rabin, Matthew Lee Smith, Gwenndolyn C. Porter, Marcia G. Ory, Paul A. Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand "how" and "why" results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number64
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume7
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Health Behavior
Publications
Public Health
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Dissemination
  • Evaluation
  • External validity
  • Implementation
  • RE-AIM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework : Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. / Glasgow, Russell E.; Harden, Samantha M.; Gaglio, Bridget; Rabin, Borsika; Smith, Matthew Lee; Porter, Gwenndolyn C.; Ory, Marcia G.; Estabrooks, Paul A.

In: Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 7, No. MAR, 64, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Glasgow, Russell E. ; Harden, Samantha M. ; Gaglio, Bridget ; Rabin, Borsika ; Smith, Matthew Lee ; Porter, Gwenndolyn C. ; Ory, Marcia G. ; Estabrooks, Paul A. / RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework : Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. In: Frontiers in Public Health. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. MAR.
@article{c3a5dd1a529d458c8ed22ccf7766e6ef,
title = "RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review",
abstract = "The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand {"}how{"} and {"}why{"} results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.",
keywords = "Dissemination, Evaluation, External validity, Implementation, RE-AIM",
author = "Glasgow, {Russell E.} and Harden, {Samantha M.} and Bridget Gaglio and Borsika Rabin and Smith, {Matthew Lee} and Porter, {Gwenndolyn C.} and Ory, {Marcia G.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Public Health",
issn = "2296-2565",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "MAR",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework

T2 - Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review

AU - Glasgow, Russell E.

AU - Harden, Samantha M.

AU - Gaglio, Bridget

AU - Rabin, Borsika

AU - Smith, Matthew Lee

AU - Porter, Gwenndolyn C.

AU - Ory, Marcia G.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand "how" and "why" results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.

AB - The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand "how" and "why" results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.

KW - Dissemination

KW - Evaluation

KW - External validity

KW - Implementation

KW - RE-AIM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065298708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065298708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064

DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 30984733

AN - SCOPUS:85065298708

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Public Health

JF - Frontiers in Public Health

SN - 2296-2565

IS - MAR

M1 - 64

ER -