Ratings of clinical clerkship feedback by allied health faculty and students.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this survey study was to investigate allied health faculty members' and students' ratings of the clinical educational feedback process. Faculty members and students from seven allied health programs at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, who were currently involved with clinical education, were asked to indicate their feelings on a seven-point scale for each of 22 feedback characteristics. An ANOVA and a Scheffe's test for post hoc analysis were used for data analyses. The results indicated that while both faculty members and students perceived eight feedback characteristics as equally important, they differed significantly (p less than .01) in their ratings of actual feedback provided in the characteristics of specific, timely, encouraging, and recommending improvement. Other significant faculty/student discrepancies were found in the area of student reception of feedback provided. The results are useful to guide and direct improvements in the clinical education of allied health students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-121
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of allied health
Volume17
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1 1988

Fingerprint

Clinical Clerkship
Students
Health
Health Education
Analysis of Variance
Emotions
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Ratings of clinical clerkship feedback by allied health faculty and students. / Hageman, Patricia Ann.

In: Journal of allied health, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.05.1988, p. 115-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e79cc1c2f1354e43a85135c199ad25af,
title = "Ratings of clinical clerkship feedback by allied health faculty and students.",
abstract = "The purpose of this survey study was to investigate allied health faculty members' and students' ratings of the clinical educational feedback process. Faculty members and students from seven allied health programs at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, who were currently involved with clinical education, were asked to indicate their feelings on a seven-point scale for each of 22 feedback characteristics. An ANOVA and a Scheffe's test for post hoc analysis were used for data analyses. The results indicated that while both faculty members and students perceived eight feedback characteristics as equally important, they differed significantly (p less than .01) in their ratings of actual feedback provided in the characteristics of specific, timely, encouraging, and recommending improvement. Other significant faculty/student discrepancies were found in the area of student reception of feedback provided. The results are useful to guide and direct improvements in the clinical education of allied health students.",
author = "Hageman, {Patricia Ann}",
year = "1988",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "115--121",
journal = "Journal of Allied Health",
issn = "0090-7421",
publisher = "Science and Medicine Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ratings of clinical clerkship feedback by allied health faculty and students.

AU - Hageman, Patricia Ann

PY - 1988/5/1

Y1 - 1988/5/1

N2 - The purpose of this survey study was to investigate allied health faculty members' and students' ratings of the clinical educational feedback process. Faculty members and students from seven allied health programs at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, who were currently involved with clinical education, were asked to indicate their feelings on a seven-point scale for each of 22 feedback characteristics. An ANOVA and a Scheffe's test for post hoc analysis were used for data analyses. The results indicated that while both faculty members and students perceived eight feedback characteristics as equally important, they differed significantly (p less than .01) in their ratings of actual feedback provided in the characteristics of specific, timely, encouraging, and recommending improvement. Other significant faculty/student discrepancies were found in the area of student reception of feedback provided. The results are useful to guide and direct improvements in the clinical education of allied health students.

AB - The purpose of this survey study was to investigate allied health faculty members' and students' ratings of the clinical educational feedback process. Faculty members and students from seven allied health programs at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, who were currently involved with clinical education, were asked to indicate their feelings on a seven-point scale for each of 22 feedback characteristics. An ANOVA and a Scheffe's test for post hoc analysis were used for data analyses. The results indicated that while both faculty members and students perceived eight feedback characteristics as equally important, they differed significantly (p less than .01) in their ratings of actual feedback provided in the characteristics of specific, timely, encouraging, and recommending improvement. Other significant faculty/student discrepancies were found in the area of student reception of feedback provided. The results are useful to guide and direct improvements in the clinical education of allied health students.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024007779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024007779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3384735

AN - SCOPUS:0024007779

VL - 17

SP - 115

EP - 121

JO - Journal of Allied Health

JF - Journal of Allied Health

SN - 0090-7421

IS - 2

ER -