Rapid Response Team Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS)

Barbara J. Sittner, Myra S Schmaderer, Lani M Zimmerman, Melody Hertzog, Barbara George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite a concerted effort to improve patient safety within the acute care setting, patient injuries, unexpected deaths, and unplanned admissions to ICUs continue to occur. Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been developed to reduce the number of failure-to-rescue incidents in hospitalized patients by responding to a patient's deteriorating condition before an adverse event occurs. Nurses are instrumental in reducing the number of failure-to-rescue incidents through early recognition of clinical instability, prompt interventions, and activation of the RRT. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS) as an intervention to improve nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. Method: A 19-item pre-posttest within-subject design was used to determine the impact of the STEPS intervention on nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. The study also examined individual perception of the simulation experience (educational practice, simulation design, and satisfaction and self-confidence in learning) after the STEPS intervention. Participants were registered nurses employed in a progressive care unit at a Midwestern medical center. Results/Conclusions: Eleven participants completed the pretest, the immediate posttest, and the posttest 3 months after the STEPS intervention. The 3-month posttest scores for the 11 participants showed 8 increased their scores, 2 decreased their scores, and 1 stayed the same. There was no significant statistical difference over time. Nurses agreed or strongly agreed that their simulation experience was a satisfying learning experience. Human patient simulation is an effective teaching method for nurses. Nurses were highly satisfied with their simulated learning experience and valued fidelity, collaboration, and constructive feedback. Further study is needed to measure learning outcomes in nursing for human patient simulation activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e119-e127
JournalClinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
nurse
Safety
Nurses
simulation
Patient Simulation
Learning
Simulation
learning
Intensive care units
Pre-test
incident
Nursing
experience
Acute
Fidelity
Confidence
Activation
Teaching
Continue

Keywords

  • high-fidelity simulation
  • nursing education
  • patient safety
  • rapid response teams
  • satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Rapid Response Team Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS). / Sittner, Barbara J.; Schmaderer, Myra S; Zimmerman, Lani M; Hertzog, Melody; George, Barbara.

In: Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.05.2009, p. e119-e127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sittner, Barbara J. ; Schmaderer, Myra S ; Zimmerman, Lani M ; Hertzog, Melody ; George, Barbara. / Rapid Response Team Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS). In: Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. e119-e127.
@article{c9cbb3507f4640cfbffdbb2e296b13cc,
title = "Rapid Response Team Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS)",
abstract = "Background: Despite a concerted effort to improve patient safety within the acute care setting, patient injuries, unexpected deaths, and unplanned admissions to ICUs continue to occur. Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been developed to reduce the number of failure-to-rescue incidents in hospitalized patients by responding to a patient's deteriorating condition before an adverse event occurs. Nurses are instrumental in reducing the number of failure-to-rescue incidents through early recognition of clinical instability, prompt interventions, and activation of the RRT. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS) as an intervention to improve nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. Method: A 19-item pre-posttest within-subject design was used to determine the impact of the STEPS intervention on nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. The study also examined individual perception of the simulation experience (educational practice, simulation design, and satisfaction and self-confidence in learning) after the STEPS intervention. Participants were registered nurses employed in a progressive care unit at a Midwestern medical center. Results/Conclusions: Eleven participants completed the pretest, the immediate posttest, and the posttest 3 months after the STEPS intervention. The 3-month posttest scores for the 11 participants showed 8 increased their scores, 2 decreased their scores, and 1 stayed the same. There was no significant statistical difference over time. Nurses agreed or strongly agreed that their simulation experience was a satisfying learning experience. Human patient simulation is an effective teaching method for nurses. Nurses were highly satisfied with their simulated learning experience and valued fidelity, collaboration, and constructive feedback. Further study is needed to measure learning outcomes in nursing for human patient simulation activities.",
keywords = "high-fidelity simulation, nursing education, patient safety, rapid response teams, satisfaction",
author = "Sittner, {Barbara J.} and Schmaderer, {Myra S} and Zimmerman, {Lani M} and Melody Hertzog and Barbara George",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecns.2009.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "e119--e127",
journal = "Clinical Simulation in Nursing",
issn = "1876-1399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid Response Team Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS)

AU - Sittner, Barbara J.

AU - Schmaderer, Myra S

AU - Zimmerman, Lani M

AU - Hertzog, Melody

AU - George, Barbara

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - Background: Despite a concerted effort to improve patient safety within the acute care setting, patient injuries, unexpected deaths, and unplanned admissions to ICUs continue to occur. Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been developed to reduce the number of failure-to-rescue incidents in hospitalized patients by responding to a patient's deteriorating condition before an adverse event occurs. Nurses are instrumental in reducing the number of failure-to-rescue incidents through early recognition of clinical instability, prompt interventions, and activation of the RRT. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS) as an intervention to improve nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. Method: A 19-item pre-posttest within-subject design was used to determine the impact of the STEPS intervention on nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. The study also examined individual perception of the simulation experience (educational practice, simulation design, and satisfaction and self-confidence in learning) after the STEPS intervention. Participants were registered nurses employed in a progressive care unit at a Midwestern medical center. Results/Conclusions: Eleven participants completed the pretest, the immediate posttest, and the posttest 3 months after the STEPS intervention. The 3-month posttest scores for the 11 participants showed 8 increased their scores, 2 decreased their scores, and 1 stayed the same. There was no significant statistical difference over time. Nurses agreed or strongly agreed that their simulation experience was a satisfying learning experience. Human patient simulation is an effective teaching method for nurses. Nurses were highly satisfied with their simulated learning experience and valued fidelity, collaboration, and constructive feedback. Further study is needed to measure learning outcomes in nursing for human patient simulation activities.

AB - Background: Despite a concerted effort to improve patient safety within the acute care setting, patient injuries, unexpected deaths, and unplanned admissions to ICUs continue to occur. Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been developed to reduce the number of failure-to-rescue incidents in hospitalized patients by responding to a patient's deteriorating condition before an adverse event occurs. Nurses are instrumental in reducing the number of failure-to-rescue incidents through early recognition of clinical instability, prompt interventions, and activation of the RRT. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the Simulated Training for Enhancing Patient Safety (STEPS) as an intervention to improve nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. Method: A 19-item pre-posttest within-subject design was used to determine the impact of the STEPS intervention on nurses' RRT knowledge and clinical judgment. The study also examined individual perception of the simulation experience (educational practice, simulation design, and satisfaction and self-confidence in learning) after the STEPS intervention. Participants were registered nurses employed in a progressive care unit at a Midwestern medical center. Results/Conclusions: Eleven participants completed the pretest, the immediate posttest, and the posttest 3 months after the STEPS intervention. The 3-month posttest scores for the 11 participants showed 8 increased their scores, 2 decreased their scores, and 1 stayed the same. There was no significant statistical difference over time. Nurses agreed or strongly agreed that their simulation experience was a satisfying learning experience. Human patient simulation is an effective teaching method for nurses. Nurses were highly satisfied with their simulated learning experience and valued fidelity, collaboration, and constructive feedback. Further study is needed to measure learning outcomes in nursing for human patient simulation activities.

KW - high-fidelity simulation

KW - nursing education

KW - patient safety

KW - rapid response teams

KW - satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249089866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249089866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.02.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65249089866

VL - 5

SP - e119-e127

JO - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

JF - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

SN - 1876-1399

IS - 3

ER -