Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management

Christine Miaskowski, Marylin Dodd, Claudia West, Karen L Schumacher, Steven M. Paul, Debu Tripathy, Peter Koo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

172 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program compared with standard care in decreasing pain intensity scores, increasing appropriate analgesic prescriptions, and increasing analgesic intake in oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to the PRO-SELF intervention (n = 93) or standard care (n = 81). Patients in the standard care arm were seen by a research nurse three times and were called three times by phone between the home visits. PRO-SELF group patients were seen by specially trained intervention nurses and received a psychoeducational intervention, were taught how to use a pillbox, and were given written instructions on how to communicate with their physician about unrelieved pain and the need for changes in their analgesic prescriptions. Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve their cancer pain management. Results: Pain intensity scores decreased significantly from baseline (all P < .0001) in the PRO-SELF group (ie, least pain, 28.4%; average pain, 32.5%; and worst pain, 27.0%) compared with the standard care group (ie, least increased by 14.6%, average increased by 1.9%, and worst decreased by 1.2%). The percentage of patients in the PRO-SELF group with the most appropriate type of analgesic prescription increased significantly from 28.3% to 37.0% (P = .008) compared with a change from 29.6% to 32.5% in the standard care group. Conclusion: The use of a psychoeducational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve the management of cancer pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1713-1720
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Self Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Analgesics
Prescriptions
House Calls
Nurses
Cancer Pain
Outpatients
Neoplasm Metastasis
Physicians
Bone and Bones
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M., West, C., Schumacher, K. L., Paul, S. M., Tripathy, D., & Koo, P. (2004). Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(9), 1713-1720. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140

Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. / Miaskowski, Christine; Dodd, Marylin; West, Claudia; Schumacher, Karen L; Paul, Steven M.; Tripathy, Debu; Koo, Peter.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 22, No. 9, 01.12.2004, p. 1713-1720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miaskowski, C, Dodd, M, West, C, Schumacher, KL, Paul, SM, Tripathy, D & Koo, P 2004, 'Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1713-1720. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140
Miaskowski, Christine ; Dodd, Marylin ; West, Claudia ; Schumacher, Karen L ; Paul, Steven M. ; Tripathy, Debu ; Koo, Peter. / Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004 ; Vol. 22, No. 9. pp. 1713-1720.
@article{685fb14773514a0c99605b52607a3e03,
title = "Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management",
abstract = "Purpose: This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program compared with standard care in decreasing pain intensity scores, increasing appropriate analgesic prescriptions, and increasing analgesic intake in oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to the PRO-SELF intervention (n = 93) or standard care (n = 81). Patients in the standard care arm were seen by a research nurse three times and were called three times by phone between the home visits. PRO-SELF group patients were seen by specially trained intervention nurses and received a psychoeducational intervention, were taught how to use a pillbox, and were given written instructions on how to communicate with their physician about unrelieved pain and the need for changes in their analgesic prescriptions. Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve their cancer pain management. Results: Pain intensity scores decreased significantly from baseline (all P < .0001) in the PRO-SELF group (ie, least pain, 28.4{\%}; average pain, 32.5{\%}; and worst pain, 27.0{\%}) compared with the standard care group (ie, least increased by 14.6{\%}, average increased by 1.9{\%}, and worst decreased by 1.2{\%}). The percentage of patients in the PRO-SELF group with the most appropriate type of analgesic prescription increased significantly from 28.3{\%} to 37.0{\%} (P = .008) compared with a change from 29.6{\%} to 32.5{\%} in the standard care group. Conclusion: The use of a psychoeducational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve the management of cancer pain.",
author = "Christine Miaskowski and Marylin Dodd and Claudia West and Schumacher, {Karen L} and Paul, {Steven M.} and Debu Tripathy and Peter Koo",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1713--1720",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management

AU - Miaskowski, Christine

AU - Dodd, Marylin

AU - West, Claudia

AU - Schumacher, Karen L

AU - Paul, Steven M.

AU - Tripathy, Debu

AU - Koo, Peter

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Purpose: This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program compared with standard care in decreasing pain intensity scores, increasing appropriate analgesic prescriptions, and increasing analgesic intake in oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to the PRO-SELF intervention (n = 93) or standard care (n = 81). Patients in the standard care arm were seen by a research nurse three times and were called three times by phone between the home visits. PRO-SELF group patients were seen by specially trained intervention nurses and received a psychoeducational intervention, were taught how to use a pillbox, and were given written instructions on how to communicate with their physician about unrelieved pain and the need for changes in their analgesic prescriptions. Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve their cancer pain management. Results: Pain intensity scores decreased significantly from baseline (all P < .0001) in the PRO-SELF group (ie, least pain, 28.4%; average pain, 32.5%; and worst pain, 27.0%) compared with the standard care group (ie, least increased by 14.6%, average increased by 1.9%, and worst decreased by 1.2%). The percentage of patients in the PRO-SELF group with the most appropriate type of analgesic prescription increased significantly from 28.3% to 37.0% (P = .008) compared with a change from 29.6% to 32.5% in the standard care group. Conclusion: The use of a psychoeducational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve the management of cancer pain.

AB - Purpose: This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program compared with standard care in decreasing pain intensity scores, increasing appropriate analgesic prescriptions, and increasing analgesic intake in oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to the PRO-SELF intervention (n = 93) or standard care (n = 81). Patients in the standard care arm were seen by a research nurse three times and were called three times by phone between the home visits. PRO-SELF group patients were seen by specially trained intervention nurses and received a psychoeducational intervention, were taught how to use a pillbox, and were given written instructions on how to communicate with their physician about unrelieved pain and the need for changes in their analgesic prescriptions. Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve their cancer pain management. Results: Pain intensity scores decreased significantly from baseline (all P < .0001) in the PRO-SELF group (ie, least pain, 28.4%; average pain, 32.5%; and worst pain, 27.0%) compared with the standard care group (ie, least increased by 14.6%, average increased by 1.9%, and worst decreased by 1.2%). The percentage of patients in the PRO-SELF group with the most appropriate type of analgesic prescription increased significantly from 28.3% to 37.0% (P = .008) compared with a change from 29.6% to 32.5% in the standard care group. Conclusion: The use of a psychoeducational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve the management of cancer pain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442717966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442717966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1713

EP - 1720

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 9

ER -