Quantity and quality: Increasing safety norms through after action reviews

Alexandra M. Dunn, Clifton Scott, Joseph A. Allen, Daniel Bonilla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Workplace safety is a concern for both scholars and practitioners alike because accidents and injuries can result in time away from work and lost organizational resources. This study focuses on how one type of post-incident discussion can be effectively used to promote positive safety norms. It adds to the growing body of research on after action review meetings, one type of post-incident discussion intervention commonly used in high reliability organizations to increase future workplace safety behaviors. This study also extends the sensemaking and high reliability literatures by examining a three-way interaction between perceived frequency of after action review meetings, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety. Survey data were obtained from 330 firefighters. Results from the three-way interaction showed that safety norms were highest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously high, and safety norms were lowest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously low. By examining both the perceived quantity and quality of after action review meetings, this study provides insight into which after action review facilitation objectives are most likely to increase positive safety norms and ultimately create a shared understanding of how to behave safely in future workplace events in high reliability organizational contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1209-1232
Number of pages24
JournalHuman Relations
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

workplace
incident
interaction
accident
event
resources
Safety
After action review
Accidents
Psychological safety
time
literature
Workplace safety
Interaction
Incidents
Psychological
Work Place

Keywords

  • after action review meeting
  • after action reviews
  • ambiguity reduction
  • meetings
  • psychological safety
  • safety norms
  • sensemaking
  • workplace safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Quantity and quality : Increasing safety norms through after action reviews. / Dunn, Alexandra M.; Scott, Clifton; Allen, Joseph A.; Bonilla, Daniel.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 69, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 1209-1232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunn, Alexandra M. ; Scott, Clifton ; Allen, Joseph A. ; Bonilla, Daniel. / Quantity and quality : Increasing safety norms through after action reviews. In: Human Relations. 2015 ; Vol. 69, No. 5. pp. 1209-1232.
@article{40ad0bc1c53f417c8d167578db97ca1d,
title = "Quantity and quality: Increasing safety norms through after action reviews",
abstract = "Workplace safety is a concern for both scholars and practitioners alike because accidents and injuries can result in time away from work and lost organizational resources. This study focuses on how one type of post-incident discussion can be effectively used to promote positive safety norms. It adds to the growing body of research on after action review meetings, one type of post-incident discussion intervention commonly used in high reliability organizations to increase future workplace safety behaviors. This study also extends the sensemaking and high reliability literatures by examining a three-way interaction between perceived frequency of after action review meetings, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety. Survey data were obtained from 330 firefighters. Results from the three-way interaction showed that safety norms were highest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously high, and safety norms were lowest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously low. By examining both the perceived quantity and quality of after action review meetings, this study provides insight into which after action review facilitation objectives are most likely to increase positive safety norms and ultimately create a shared understanding of how to behave safely in future workplace events in high reliability organizational contexts.",
keywords = "after action review meeting, after action reviews, ambiguity reduction, meetings, psychological safety, safety norms, sensemaking, workplace safety",
author = "Dunn, {Alexandra M.} and Clifton Scott and Allen, {Joseph A.} and Daniel Bonilla",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726715609972",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "1209--1232",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantity and quality

T2 - Increasing safety norms through after action reviews

AU - Dunn, Alexandra M.

AU - Scott, Clifton

AU - Allen, Joseph A.

AU - Bonilla, Daniel

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Workplace safety is a concern for both scholars and practitioners alike because accidents and injuries can result in time away from work and lost organizational resources. This study focuses on how one type of post-incident discussion can be effectively used to promote positive safety norms. It adds to the growing body of research on after action review meetings, one type of post-incident discussion intervention commonly used in high reliability organizations to increase future workplace safety behaviors. This study also extends the sensemaking and high reliability literatures by examining a three-way interaction between perceived frequency of after action review meetings, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety. Survey data were obtained from 330 firefighters. Results from the three-way interaction showed that safety norms were highest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously high, and safety norms were lowest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously low. By examining both the perceived quantity and quality of after action review meetings, this study provides insight into which after action review facilitation objectives are most likely to increase positive safety norms and ultimately create a shared understanding of how to behave safely in future workplace events in high reliability organizational contexts.

AB - Workplace safety is a concern for both scholars and practitioners alike because accidents and injuries can result in time away from work and lost organizational resources. This study focuses on how one type of post-incident discussion can be effectively used to promote positive safety norms. It adds to the growing body of research on after action review meetings, one type of post-incident discussion intervention commonly used in high reliability organizations to increase future workplace safety behaviors. This study also extends the sensemaking and high reliability literatures by examining a three-way interaction between perceived frequency of after action review meetings, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety. Survey data were obtained from 330 firefighters. Results from the three-way interaction showed that safety norms were highest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously high, and safety norms were lowest when perceived after action review frequency, ambiguity reduction and psychological safety were simultaneously low. By examining both the perceived quantity and quality of after action review meetings, this study provides insight into which after action review facilitation objectives are most likely to increase positive safety norms and ultimately create a shared understanding of how to behave safely in future workplace events in high reliability organizational contexts.

KW - after action review meeting

KW - after action reviews

KW - ambiguity reduction

KW - meetings

KW - psychological safety

KW - safety norms

KW - sensemaking

KW - workplace safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964858374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964858374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726715609972

DO - 10.1177/0018726715609972

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964858374

VL - 69

SP - 1209

EP - 1232

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 5

ER -