Quantifying the relative contributions of environmental sources to the microbial community in an urban stream under dry and wet weather conditions

Darshan Baral, Allison Speicher, Bruce Dvorak, David Admiraal, Xu Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigating sources of microbial contamination in urban streams, especially when there are no contributions from combined sewer overflows or sewage effluent discharges, can be challenging. The objectives of this study were to identify the sources of microbes in an urban stream and quantify their relative contributions to the microbial community in the stream under dry and wet weather conditions. A microbial source tracking method relying on the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the microbial communities in water samples of an urban stream (i.e., from 11 dry and 6 wet weather events), as well as in streambed sediment, soils, street sweepings, sanitary sewage, an upstream lake, and feces of animals and birds collected between 2013 and 2015. The results showed that the Escherichia coli levels in the stream were significantly higher in wet weather flow than in dry weather flow. The upstream lake contributed approximately 93% of the microbes in dry weather flows. Water discharged from storm drain outfalls was the biggest source of microbes in wet weather flows, with a median contribution of approximately 90% in the rising limb and peak flow and about 75% in the declining limb of storms. Furthermore, about 70 to 75% of the microbes in the storm drain outfall water came from materials washed off from the street surfaces in the watershed. Fecal samples did not appear to contribute substantially to the microbes in environmental samples. The results highlight the significance of street surfaces in contributing microbial loads to urban streams under wet weather conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere00896-18
JournalApplied and environmental microbiology
Volume84
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Weather
microbial communities
microbial community
weather
microorganisms
drain
Lakes
Sewage
limb
limbs (animal)
sewage
Water
Extremities
lakes
lake
peak flow
sewage effluent
microbial load
microbial contamination
feces

Keywords

  • Dry weather condition
  • Microbial source tracking
  • Urban stream
  • Wet weather condition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Food Science
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Quantifying the relative contributions of environmental sources to the microbial community in an urban stream under dry and wet weather conditions. / Baral, Darshan; Speicher, Allison; Dvorak, Bruce; Admiraal, David; Li, Xu.

In: Applied and environmental microbiology, Vol. 84, No. 15, e00896-18, 01.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36d1a4a52b6248d8816422210c5dc4af,
title = "Quantifying the relative contributions of environmental sources to the microbial community in an urban stream under dry and wet weather conditions",
abstract = "Investigating sources of microbial contamination in urban streams, especially when there are no contributions from combined sewer overflows or sewage effluent discharges, can be challenging. The objectives of this study were to identify the sources of microbes in an urban stream and quantify their relative contributions to the microbial community in the stream under dry and wet weather conditions. A microbial source tracking method relying on the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the microbial communities in water samples of an urban stream (i.e., from 11 dry and 6 wet weather events), as well as in streambed sediment, soils, street sweepings, sanitary sewage, an upstream lake, and feces of animals and birds collected between 2013 and 2015. The results showed that the Escherichia coli levels in the stream were significantly higher in wet weather flow than in dry weather flow. The upstream lake contributed approximately 93{\%} of the microbes in dry weather flows. Water discharged from storm drain outfalls was the biggest source of microbes in wet weather flows, with a median contribution of approximately 90{\%} in the rising limb and peak flow and about 75{\%} in the declining limb of storms. Furthermore, about 70 to 75{\%} of the microbes in the storm drain outfall water came from materials washed off from the street surfaces in the watershed. Fecal samples did not appear to contribute substantially to the microbes in environmental samples. The results highlight the significance of street surfaces in contributing microbial loads to urban streams under wet weather conditions.",
keywords = "Dry weather condition, Microbial source tracking, Urban stream, Wet weather condition",
author = "Darshan Baral and Allison Speicher and Bruce Dvorak and David Admiraal and Xu Li",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1128/AEM.00896-18",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
journal = "Applied and Environmental Microbiology",
issn = "0099-2240",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the relative contributions of environmental sources to the microbial community in an urban stream under dry and wet weather conditions

AU - Baral, Darshan

AU - Speicher, Allison

AU - Dvorak, Bruce

AU - Admiraal, David

AU - Li, Xu

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Investigating sources of microbial contamination in urban streams, especially when there are no contributions from combined sewer overflows or sewage effluent discharges, can be challenging. The objectives of this study were to identify the sources of microbes in an urban stream and quantify their relative contributions to the microbial community in the stream under dry and wet weather conditions. A microbial source tracking method relying on the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the microbial communities in water samples of an urban stream (i.e., from 11 dry and 6 wet weather events), as well as in streambed sediment, soils, street sweepings, sanitary sewage, an upstream lake, and feces of animals and birds collected between 2013 and 2015. The results showed that the Escherichia coli levels in the stream were significantly higher in wet weather flow than in dry weather flow. The upstream lake contributed approximately 93% of the microbes in dry weather flows. Water discharged from storm drain outfalls was the biggest source of microbes in wet weather flows, with a median contribution of approximately 90% in the rising limb and peak flow and about 75% in the declining limb of storms. Furthermore, about 70 to 75% of the microbes in the storm drain outfall water came from materials washed off from the street surfaces in the watershed. Fecal samples did not appear to contribute substantially to the microbes in environmental samples. The results highlight the significance of street surfaces in contributing microbial loads to urban streams under wet weather conditions.

AB - Investigating sources of microbial contamination in urban streams, especially when there are no contributions from combined sewer overflows or sewage effluent discharges, can be challenging. The objectives of this study were to identify the sources of microbes in an urban stream and quantify their relative contributions to the microbial community in the stream under dry and wet weather conditions. A microbial source tracking method relying on the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the microbial communities in water samples of an urban stream (i.e., from 11 dry and 6 wet weather events), as well as in streambed sediment, soils, street sweepings, sanitary sewage, an upstream lake, and feces of animals and birds collected between 2013 and 2015. The results showed that the Escherichia coli levels in the stream were significantly higher in wet weather flow than in dry weather flow. The upstream lake contributed approximately 93% of the microbes in dry weather flows. Water discharged from storm drain outfalls was the biggest source of microbes in wet weather flows, with a median contribution of approximately 90% in the rising limb and peak flow and about 75% in the declining limb of storms. Furthermore, about 70 to 75% of the microbes in the storm drain outfall water came from materials washed off from the street surfaces in the watershed. Fecal samples did not appear to contribute substantially to the microbes in environmental samples. The results highlight the significance of street surfaces in contributing microbial loads to urban streams under wet weather conditions.

KW - Dry weather condition

KW - Microbial source tracking

KW - Urban stream

KW - Wet weather condition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050958025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050958025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1128/AEM.00896-18

DO - 10.1128/AEM.00896-18

M3 - Article

C2 - 29858206

AN - SCOPUS:85050958025

VL - 84

JO - Applied and Environmental Microbiology

JF - Applied and Environmental Microbiology

SN - 0099-2240

IS - 15

M1 - e00896-18

ER -