Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles: Room for Better Balance?

Denny Yu, Bethany Lowndes, Cornelius Thiels, Juliane Bingener, Amro Abdelrahman, Rebecca Lyons, Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surgical performance, provider health, and patient safety can be compromised when workload demands exceed individual capability on the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare intraoperative workload among surgical team members. Methods: Observations were conducted for an entire surgical day for 33 participating surgeons and their surgical team at one medical institution. Workload (mental, physical, case complexity, distractions, and case difficulty) was measured for each surgical team member using questions from validated questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed with a mixed effects model. Results: A total of 192 surgical team members participated in 78 operative cases, and 344 questionnaires were collected. Procedures with high surgeon mental and physical workload included endovascular and gastric surgeries, respectively. Ratings did not differ significantly among surgeons and residents, but scrub nurses physical demand ratings were 14–22 (out of 100) points lower than the surgeons, residents, and surgical assistants. Residents reported the highest mental workload, averaging 19–24 points higher than surgical assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses. Mental and physical demands exceeded 50 points 28–45 % of the time for surgeons and residents. Workload did not differ between minimally invasive and open techniques. Conclusion: The workload questionnaires are an effective tool for quantifying intraoperative workload across the surgical team to ensure mental and physical demands do not exceed thresholds where performance may decrease and injury risk increase. This tool has the potential to measure the safety of current procedures and drive design of workload interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1565-1574
Number of pages10
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Workload
Nurses
Patient Safety
Stomach
Surgeons
Safety
Health
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles : Room for Better Balance? / Yu, Denny; Lowndes, Bethany; Thiels, Cornelius; Bingener, Juliane; Abdelrahman, Amro; Lyons, Rebecca; Hallbeck, Susan.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 1565-1574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yu, Denny ; Lowndes, Bethany ; Thiels, Cornelius ; Bingener, Juliane ; Abdelrahman, Amro ; Lyons, Rebecca ; Hallbeck, Susan. / Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles : Room for Better Balance?. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 7. pp. 1565-1574.
@article{df8ff151c33a41959e887f05fcfdb076,
title = "Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles: Room for Better Balance?",
abstract = "Background: Surgical performance, provider health, and patient safety can be compromised when workload demands exceed individual capability on the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare intraoperative workload among surgical team members. Methods: Observations were conducted for an entire surgical day for 33 participating surgeons and their surgical team at one medical institution. Workload (mental, physical, case complexity, distractions, and case difficulty) was measured for each surgical team member using questions from validated questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed with a mixed effects model. Results: A total of 192 surgical team members participated in 78 operative cases, and 344 questionnaires were collected. Procedures with high surgeon mental and physical workload included endovascular and gastric surgeries, respectively. Ratings did not differ significantly among surgeons and residents, but scrub nurses physical demand ratings were 14–22 (out of 100) points lower than the surgeons, residents, and surgical assistants. Residents reported the highest mental workload, averaging 19–24 points higher than surgical assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses. Mental and physical demands exceeded 50 points 28–45 {\%} of the time for surgeons and residents. Workload did not differ between minimally invasive and open techniques. Conclusion: The workload questionnaires are an effective tool for quantifying intraoperative workload across the surgical team to ensure mental and physical demands do not exceed thresholds where performance may decrease and injury risk increase. This tool has the potential to measure the safety of current procedures and drive design of workload interventions.",
author = "Denny Yu and Bethany Lowndes and Cornelius Thiels and Juliane Bingener and Amro Abdelrahman and Rebecca Lyons and Susan Hallbeck",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-016-3449-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1565--1574",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles

T2 - Room for Better Balance?

AU - Yu, Denny

AU - Lowndes, Bethany

AU - Thiels, Cornelius

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Abdelrahman, Amro

AU - Lyons, Rebecca

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Background: Surgical performance, provider health, and patient safety can be compromised when workload demands exceed individual capability on the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare intraoperative workload among surgical team members. Methods: Observations were conducted for an entire surgical day for 33 participating surgeons and their surgical team at one medical institution. Workload (mental, physical, case complexity, distractions, and case difficulty) was measured for each surgical team member using questions from validated questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed with a mixed effects model. Results: A total of 192 surgical team members participated in 78 operative cases, and 344 questionnaires were collected. Procedures with high surgeon mental and physical workload included endovascular and gastric surgeries, respectively. Ratings did not differ significantly among surgeons and residents, but scrub nurses physical demand ratings were 14–22 (out of 100) points lower than the surgeons, residents, and surgical assistants. Residents reported the highest mental workload, averaging 19–24 points higher than surgical assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses. Mental and physical demands exceeded 50 points 28–45 % of the time for surgeons and residents. Workload did not differ between minimally invasive and open techniques. Conclusion: The workload questionnaires are an effective tool for quantifying intraoperative workload across the surgical team to ensure mental and physical demands do not exceed thresholds where performance may decrease and injury risk increase. This tool has the potential to measure the safety of current procedures and drive design of workload interventions.

AB - Background: Surgical performance, provider health, and patient safety can be compromised when workload demands exceed individual capability on the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare intraoperative workload among surgical team members. Methods: Observations were conducted for an entire surgical day for 33 participating surgeons and their surgical team at one medical institution. Workload (mental, physical, case complexity, distractions, and case difficulty) was measured for each surgical team member using questions from validated questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed with a mixed effects model. Results: A total of 192 surgical team members participated in 78 operative cases, and 344 questionnaires were collected. Procedures with high surgeon mental and physical workload included endovascular and gastric surgeries, respectively. Ratings did not differ significantly among surgeons and residents, but scrub nurses physical demand ratings were 14–22 (out of 100) points lower than the surgeons, residents, and surgical assistants. Residents reported the highest mental workload, averaging 19–24 points higher than surgical assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses. Mental and physical demands exceeded 50 points 28–45 % of the time for surgeons and residents. Workload did not differ between minimally invasive and open techniques. Conclusion: The workload questionnaires are an effective tool for quantifying intraoperative workload across the surgical team to ensure mental and physical demands do not exceed thresholds where performance may decrease and injury risk increase. This tool has the potential to measure the safety of current procedures and drive design of workload interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960120569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960120569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-016-3449-6

DO - 10.1007/s00268-016-3449-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 26952115

AN - SCOPUS:84960120569

VL - 40

SP - 1565

EP - 1574

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 7

ER -