Quality of Life and Recommendations for Further Care

Michael S. Putman, Hyo Jung Tak, Farr A. Curlin, John D. Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Physician recommendations for further medical treatment or palliative treatment only at the end of life may influence patient decisions. Little is known about the patient characteristics that affect physician-assessed quality of life or how such assessments are related to subsequent recommendations. Design, Setting, and Subjects: A 2010 mailed survey of practicing U.S. physicians (1,156/1,878 or 62% of eligible physicians responded). Measurements and Main Results: Measures included an end of life vignette with five experimentally varied patient characteristics: setting, alimentation, pain, cognition, and communication. Physicians rated vignette patient quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100 and indicated whether they would recommend continuing full medical treatment or palliative treatment only. Cognitive deficits and alimentation had the greatest impacts on recommendations for further care, but pain and communication were also significant (all p < 0.001). Physicians who recommended continuing full medical treatment rated quality of life three times higher than those recommending palliative treatment only (40.41 vs 12.19; p < 0.01). Religious physicians were more likely to assess quality of life higher and to recommend full medical treatment. Conclusions: Physician judgments about quality of life are highly correlated with recommendations for further care. Patients and family members might consider these biases when negotiating medical decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1996-2002
Number of pages7
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Physicians
Palliative Care
Communication
Pain
Negotiating
Therapeutics
Cognition

Keywords

  • critical care
  • end-of-life care
  • medical decision-making
  • physician recommendations
  • quality of Life
  • withdrawal of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Quality of Life and Recommendations for Further Care. / Putman, Michael S.; Tak, Hyo Jung; Curlin, Farr A.; Yoon, John D.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 44, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1996-2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Putman, Michael S. ; Tak, Hyo Jung ; Curlin, Farr A. ; Yoon, John D. / Quality of Life and Recommendations for Further Care. In: Critical care medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 11. pp. 1996-2002.
@article{fad991cbc248457e8c6b671557a0ff99,
title = "Quality of Life and Recommendations for Further Care",
abstract = "Objectives: Physician recommendations for further medical treatment or palliative treatment only at the end of life may influence patient decisions. Little is known about the patient characteristics that affect physician-assessed quality of life or how such assessments are related to subsequent recommendations. Design, Setting, and Subjects: A 2010 mailed survey of practicing U.S. physicians (1,156/1,878 or 62{\%} of eligible physicians responded). Measurements and Main Results: Measures included an end of life vignette with five experimentally varied patient characteristics: setting, alimentation, pain, cognition, and communication. Physicians rated vignette patient quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100 and indicated whether they would recommend continuing full medical treatment or palliative treatment only. Cognitive deficits and alimentation had the greatest impacts on recommendations for further care, but pain and communication were also significant (all p < 0.001). Physicians who recommended continuing full medical treatment rated quality of life three times higher than those recommending palliative treatment only (40.41 vs 12.19; p < 0.01). Religious physicians were more likely to assess quality of life higher and to recommend full medical treatment. Conclusions: Physician judgments about quality of life are highly correlated with recommendations for further care. Patients and family members might consider these biases when negotiating medical decisions.",
keywords = "critical care, end-of-life care, medical decision-making, physician recommendations, quality of Life, withdrawal of care",
author = "Putman, {Michael S.} and Tak, {Hyo Jung} and Curlin, {Farr A.} and Yoon, {John D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000001846",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1996--2002",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of Life and Recommendations for Further Care

AU - Putman, Michael S.

AU - Tak, Hyo Jung

AU - Curlin, Farr A.

AU - Yoon, John D.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objectives: Physician recommendations for further medical treatment or palliative treatment only at the end of life may influence patient decisions. Little is known about the patient characteristics that affect physician-assessed quality of life or how such assessments are related to subsequent recommendations. Design, Setting, and Subjects: A 2010 mailed survey of practicing U.S. physicians (1,156/1,878 or 62% of eligible physicians responded). Measurements and Main Results: Measures included an end of life vignette with five experimentally varied patient characteristics: setting, alimentation, pain, cognition, and communication. Physicians rated vignette patient quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100 and indicated whether they would recommend continuing full medical treatment or palliative treatment only. Cognitive deficits and alimentation had the greatest impacts on recommendations for further care, but pain and communication were also significant (all p < 0.001). Physicians who recommended continuing full medical treatment rated quality of life three times higher than those recommending palliative treatment only (40.41 vs 12.19; p < 0.01). Religious physicians were more likely to assess quality of life higher and to recommend full medical treatment. Conclusions: Physician judgments about quality of life are highly correlated with recommendations for further care. Patients and family members might consider these biases when negotiating medical decisions.

AB - Objectives: Physician recommendations for further medical treatment or palliative treatment only at the end of life may influence patient decisions. Little is known about the patient characteristics that affect physician-assessed quality of life or how such assessments are related to subsequent recommendations. Design, Setting, and Subjects: A 2010 mailed survey of practicing U.S. physicians (1,156/1,878 or 62% of eligible physicians responded). Measurements and Main Results: Measures included an end of life vignette with five experimentally varied patient characteristics: setting, alimentation, pain, cognition, and communication. Physicians rated vignette patient quality of life on a scale from 0 to 100 and indicated whether they would recommend continuing full medical treatment or palliative treatment only. Cognitive deficits and alimentation had the greatest impacts on recommendations for further care, but pain and communication were also significant (all p < 0.001). Physicians who recommended continuing full medical treatment rated quality of life three times higher than those recommending palliative treatment only (40.41 vs 12.19; p < 0.01). Religious physicians were more likely to assess quality of life higher and to recommend full medical treatment. Conclusions: Physician judgments about quality of life are highly correlated with recommendations for further care. Patients and family members might consider these biases when negotiating medical decisions.

KW - critical care

KW - end-of-life care

KW - medical decision-making

KW - physician recommendations

KW - quality of Life

KW - withdrawal of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978997566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978997566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001846

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001846

M3 - Article

C2 - 27441902

AN - SCOPUS:84978997566

VL - 44

SP - 1996

EP - 2002

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 11

ER -