Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement within air transport programs

Kendra T. Balazs, Cheryl Bagley Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: In June of 1993, the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Quality Management Committee surveyed 240 air medical programs regarding their Quality Assurance and Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Methods: The survey tool consisted of questions related to Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement program structure and specific Quality Assurance indicators contained in the AAMS/NFNA Quality Assurance Resource Document. Comparisons were made among fixed-wing, rotor-wing, and combined programs, for use of the Quality Assurance Resource Document, for availability of computers and for hospital-based versus profit or public service programs. Results: Returned surveys totaled 148 for a 62% return rate, with most of the respondents being single hospital based programs. Ninety-three percent of those surveyed have a Quality Assurance program in place to monitor indicators, whereas 63% have also begun to include the Continuous Quality Improvement team process. Only 50% of respondents use computers in their Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Conclusion: Significant differences among groups were found for several Quality Assurance indicators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-107
Number of pages4
JournalAir medical journal
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Air
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Air medical transport
  • Continuous quality improvement
  • Quality assurance
  • Quality assurance indicators
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement within air transport programs. / Balazs, Kendra T.; Thompson, Cheryl Bagley.

In: Air medical journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.01.1996, p. 104-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6aa995c7089b41408edbdf7107a23b7e,
title = "Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement within air transport programs",
abstract = "Introduction: In June of 1993, the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Quality Management Committee surveyed 240 air medical programs regarding their Quality Assurance and Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Methods: The survey tool consisted of questions related to Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement program structure and specific Quality Assurance indicators contained in the AAMS/NFNA Quality Assurance Resource Document. Comparisons were made among fixed-wing, rotor-wing, and combined programs, for use of the Quality Assurance Resource Document, for availability of computers and for hospital-based versus profit or public service programs. Results: Returned surveys totaled 148 for a 62{\%} return rate, with most of the respondents being single hospital based programs. Ninety-three percent of those surveyed have a Quality Assurance program in place to monitor indicators, whereas 63{\%} have also begun to include the Continuous Quality Improvement team process. Only 50{\%} of respondents use computers in their Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Conclusion: Significant differences among groups were found for several Quality Assurance indicators.",
keywords = "Air medical transport, Continuous quality improvement, Quality assurance, Quality assurance indicators, Survey",
author = "Balazs, {Kendra T.} and Thompson, {Cheryl Bagley}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1067-991X(96)90034-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "104--107",
journal = "Air Medical Journal",
issn = "1067-991X",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement within air transport programs

AU - Balazs, Kendra T.

AU - Thompson, Cheryl Bagley

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Introduction: In June of 1993, the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Quality Management Committee surveyed 240 air medical programs regarding their Quality Assurance and Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Methods: The survey tool consisted of questions related to Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement program structure and specific Quality Assurance indicators contained in the AAMS/NFNA Quality Assurance Resource Document. Comparisons were made among fixed-wing, rotor-wing, and combined programs, for use of the Quality Assurance Resource Document, for availability of computers and for hospital-based versus profit or public service programs. Results: Returned surveys totaled 148 for a 62% return rate, with most of the respondents being single hospital based programs. Ninety-three percent of those surveyed have a Quality Assurance program in place to monitor indicators, whereas 63% have also begun to include the Continuous Quality Improvement team process. Only 50% of respondents use computers in their Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Conclusion: Significant differences among groups were found for several Quality Assurance indicators.

AB - Introduction: In June of 1993, the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Quality Management Committee surveyed 240 air medical programs regarding their Quality Assurance and Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Methods: The survey tool consisted of questions related to Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement program structure and specific Quality Assurance indicators contained in the AAMS/NFNA Quality Assurance Resource Document. Comparisons were made among fixed-wing, rotor-wing, and combined programs, for use of the Quality Assurance Resource Document, for availability of computers and for hospital-based versus profit or public service programs. Results: Returned surveys totaled 148 for a 62% return rate, with most of the respondents being single hospital based programs. Ninety-three percent of those surveyed have a Quality Assurance program in place to monitor indicators, whereas 63% have also begun to include the Continuous Quality Improvement team process. Only 50% of respondents use computers in their Quality Assurance/Continuous Quality Improvement activities. Conclusion: Significant differences among groups were found for several Quality Assurance indicators.

KW - Air medical transport

KW - Continuous quality improvement

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Quality assurance indicators

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030187951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030187951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1067-991X(96)90034-6

DO - 10.1016/S1067-991X(96)90034-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 10159925

AN - SCOPUS:0030187951

VL - 15

SP - 104

EP - 107

JO - Air Medical Journal

JF - Air Medical Journal

SN - 1067-991X

IS - 3

ER -