Psychotherapy for schizophrenia in the year 2030

Prognosis and prognostication

William D Spaulding, Jeffrey Nolting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of psychotherapy techniques have been developed that, to varying degrees, have empirical support demonstrating favorable effects in the treatment of schizophrenia (or serious mental illness [SMI]). These techniques, and the research, vary with respect to theoretical origins, format, treatment targets, and expected outcome. A historical perspective informs understanding of this proliferation. One landmark in psychotherapy research was the recognition of common factors: different therapies embody common therapeutic factors not central to any one school. Importantly, insights about common factors reflected a better theoretical understanding of the psychotherapy process and led to the translation of learning and conditioning theories into the psychotherapy vocabulary. This resulted in the distinction between specific and nonspecific treatment effects, which pose present-day research questions such as how common and specific factors interact, and the differentiation of techniques for specific recipients. Because psychotherapy research progresses over the next 25 years, it will be important to develop a model that can answer such questions while incorporating the proliferation of specific modalities and the search for the "right recipe." This "search" will coincide with more attention to individual differences, it will incorporate quantitative modeling, and it will spawn an array of "tools" for treating problems associated with SMI. Because self-knowledge and personhood again become recognized dimensions of recovery, traditional psychodynamic principles and techniques will be revisited. This article explicates a 4-factor model that may be a view to the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSchizophrenia bulletin
Volume32
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Schizophrenia
Research
Personhood
Therapeutics
Vocabulary
Individuality
Research Design
Learning

Keywords

  • Common factors
  • Demand-access matching
  • Schizophrenia
  • Vulnerability linked/episode linked

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Psychotherapy for schizophrenia in the year 2030 : Prognosis and prognostication. / Spaulding, William D; Nolting, Jeffrey.

In: Schizophrenia bulletin, Vol. 32, No. SUPPL.1, 01.10.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a28ff20da8df4a9b97e0e89f77a61879,
title = "Psychotherapy for schizophrenia in the year 2030: Prognosis and prognostication",
abstract = "A number of psychotherapy techniques have been developed that, to varying degrees, have empirical support demonstrating favorable effects in the treatment of schizophrenia (or serious mental illness [SMI]). These techniques, and the research, vary with respect to theoretical origins, format, treatment targets, and expected outcome. A historical perspective informs understanding of this proliferation. One landmark in psychotherapy research was the recognition of common factors: different therapies embody common therapeutic factors not central to any one school. Importantly, insights about common factors reflected a better theoretical understanding of the psychotherapy process and led to the translation of learning and conditioning theories into the psychotherapy vocabulary. This resulted in the distinction between specific and nonspecific treatment effects, which pose present-day research questions such as how common and specific factors interact, and the differentiation of techniques for specific recipients. Because psychotherapy research progresses over the next 25 years, it will be important to develop a model that can answer such questions while incorporating the proliferation of specific modalities and the search for the {"}right recipe.{"} This {"}search{"} will coincide with more attention to individual differences, it will incorporate quantitative modeling, and it will spawn an array of {"}tools{"} for treating problems associated with SMI. Because self-knowledge and personhood again become recognized dimensions of recovery, traditional psychodynamic principles and techniques will be revisited. This article explicates a 4-factor model that may be a view to the future.",
keywords = "Common factors, Demand-access matching, Schizophrenia, Vulnerability linked/episode linked",
author = "Spaulding, {William D} and Jeffrey Nolting",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/sbl024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychotherapy for schizophrenia in the year 2030

T2 - Prognosis and prognostication

AU - Spaulding, William D

AU - Nolting, Jeffrey

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - A number of psychotherapy techniques have been developed that, to varying degrees, have empirical support demonstrating favorable effects in the treatment of schizophrenia (or serious mental illness [SMI]). These techniques, and the research, vary with respect to theoretical origins, format, treatment targets, and expected outcome. A historical perspective informs understanding of this proliferation. One landmark in psychotherapy research was the recognition of common factors: different therapies embody common therapeutic factors not central to any one school. Importantly, insights about common factors reflected a better theoretical understanding of the psychotherapy process and led to the translation of learning and conditioning theories into the psychotherapy vocabulary. This resulted in the distinction between specific and nonspecific treatment effects, which pose present-day research questions such as how common and specific factors interact, and the differentiation of techniques for specific recipients. Because psychotherapy research progresses over the next 25 years, it will be important to develop a model that can answer such questions while incorporating the proliferation of specific modalities and the search for the "right recipe." This "search" will coincide with more attention to individual differences, it will incorporate quantitative modeling, and it will spawn an array of "tools" for treating problems associated with SMI. Because self-knowledge and personhood again become recognized dimensions of recovery, traditional psychodynamic principles and techniques will be revisited. This article explicates a 4-factor model that may be a view to the future.

AB - A number of psychotherapy techniques have been developed that, to varying degrees, have empirical support demonstrating favorable effects in the treatment of schizophrenia (or serious mental illness [SMI]). These techniques, and the research, vary with respect to theoretical origins, format, treatment targets, and expected outcome. A historical perspective informs understanding of this proliferation. One landmark in psychotherapy research was the recognition of common factors: different therapies embody common therapeutic factors not central to any one school. Importantly, insights about common factors reflected a better theoretical understanding of the psychotherapy process and led to the translation of learning and conditioning theories into the psychotherapy vocabulary. This resulted in the distinction between specific and nonspecific treatment effects, which pose present-day research questions such as how common and specific factors interact, and the differentiation of techniques for specific recipients. Because psychotherapy research progresses over the next 25 years, it will be important to develop a model that can answer such questions while incorporating the proliferation of specific modalities and the search for the "right recipe." This "search" will coincide with more attention to individual differences, it will incorporate quantitative modeling, and it will spawn an array of "tools" for treating problems associated with SMI. Because self-knowledge and personhood again become recognized dimensions of recovery, traditional psychodynamic principles and techniques will be revisited. This article explicates a 4-factor model that may be a view to the future.

KW - Common factors

KW - Demand-access matching

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Vulnerability linked/episode linked

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846262403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846262403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbl024

DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbl024

M3 - Article

VL - 32

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -