Psychopharmacological Intervention I

Teacher Perceptions of Psychotropic Medication for Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance

Nirbhay N. Singh, Michael H Epstein, Jerry Luebke, Yadhu N. Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A 27-item questionnaire was used to explore the perceptions, knowledge, and opinions of 146 teachers of students with serious emotional disturbance regarding medication used with their students. The results indicated that the student's doctor was perceived as the leading professional responsible for taking steps to have the student on or off medication for behavior disorders. Parents, the school psychologist, and the student's case committee had a moderate degree of influence on such decisions. The doctor and school psychologist were perceived to be responsible for determining the type of assessments used for evaluating drug effects. Teachers rated global impressions as the assessment procedure used most frequently for such evaluations, but suggested that informal teacher diary would be their choice. Hyperactivity and delusions/hallucinations were seen as the behavior disorders that most likely would lead to medication and, to a lesser extent, acting out and aggression. In general, the teachers desired more involvement in drug decisions and better liaison with the doctors. In addition, they uniformly suggested that their preservice and inservice training in matters related to drug treatment was inadequate, and indicated that there was a great need for further training in this area. Changes in current school policies and practices were suggested by the teachers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-295
Number of pages13
JournalThe Journal of Special Education
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Affective Symptoms
medication
Students
behavior disorder
teacher
school psychologist
drug
Mental Disorders
student
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Acting Out
Psychology
Inservice Training
delusion
school policy
Delusions
Hallucinations
Aggression
aggression
parents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Psychopharmacological Intervention I : Teacher Perceptions of Psychotropic Medication for Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance. / Singh, Nirbhay N.; Epstein, Michael H; Luebke, Jerry; Singh, Yadhu N.

In: The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.1990, p. 283-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singh, Nirbhay N. ; Epstein, Michael H ; Luebke, Jerry ; Singh, Yadhu N. / Psychopharmacological Intervention I : Teacher Perceptions of Psychotropic Medication for Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance. In: The Journal of Special Education. 1990 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 283-295.
@article{4a3aade5dc28484189ee068eb6169247,
title = "Psychopharmacological Intervention I: Teacher Perceptions of Psychotropic Medication for Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance",
abstract = "A 27-item questionnaire was used to explore the perceptions, knowledge, and opinions of 146 teachers of students with serious emotional disturbance regarding medication used with their students. The results indicated that the student's doctor was perceived as the leading professional responsible for taking steps to have the student on or off medication for behavior disorders. Parents, the school psychologist, and the student's case committee had a moderate degree of influence on such decisions. The doctor and school psychologist were perceived to be responsible for determining the type of assessments used for evaluating drug effects. Teachers rated global impressions as the assessment procedure used most frequently for such evaluations, but suggested that informal teacher diary would be their choice. Hyperactivity and delusions/hallucinations were seen as the behavior disorders that most likely would lead to medication and, to a lesser extent, acting out and aggression. In general, the teachers desired more involvement in drug decisions and better liaison with the doctors. In addition, they uniformly suggested that their preservice and inservice training in matters related to drug treatment was inadequate, and indicated that there was a great need for further training in this area. Changes in current school policies and practices were suggested by the teachers.",
author = "Singh, {Nirbhay N.} and Epstein, {Michael H} and Jerry Luebke and Singh, {Yadhu N.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002246699002400303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "283--295",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychopharmacological Intervention I

T2 - Teacher Perceptions of Psychotropic Medication for Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance

AU - Singh, Nirbhay N.

AU - Epstein, Michael H

AU - Luebke, Jerry

AU - Singh, Yadhu N.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - A 27-item questionnaire was used to explore the perceptions, knowledge, and opinions of 146 teachers of students with serious emotional disturbance regarding medication used with their students. The results indicated that the student's doctor was perceived as the leading professional responsible for taking steps to have the student on or off medication for behavior disorders. Parents, the school psychologist, and the student's case committee had a moderate degree of influence on such decisions. The doctor and school psychologist were perceived to be responsible for determining the type of assessments used for evaluating drug effects. Teachers rated global impressions as the assessment procedure used most frequently for such evaluations, but suggested that informal teacher diary would be their choice. Hyperactivity and delusions/hallucinations were seen as the behavior disorders that most likely would lead to medication and, to a lesser extent, acting out and aggression. In general, the teachers desired more involvement in drug decisions and better liaison with the doctors. In addition, they uniformly suggested that their preservice and inservice training in matters related to drug treatment was inadequate, and indicated that there was a great need for further training in this area. Changes in current school policies and practices were suggested by the teachers.

AB - A 27-item questionnaire was used to explore the perceptions, knowledge, and opinions of 146 teachers of students with serious emotional disturbance regarding medication used with their students. The results indicated that the student's doctor was perceived as the leading professional responsible for taking steps to have the student on or off medication for behavior disorders. Parents, the school psychologist, and the student's case committee had a moderate degree of influence on such decisions. The doctor and school psychologist were perceived to be responsible for determining the type of assessments used for evaluating drug effects. Teachers rated global impressions as the assessment procedure used most frequently for such evaluations, but suggested that informal teacher diary would be their choice. Hyperactivity and delusions/hallucinations were seen as the behavior disorders that most likely would lead to medication and, to a lesser extent, acting out and aggression. In general, the teachers desired more involvement in drug decisions and better liaison with the doctors. In addition, they uniformly suggested that their preservice and inservice training in matters related to drug treatment was inadequate, and indicated that there was a great need for further training in this area. Changes in current school policies and practices were suggested by the teachers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970226647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970226647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246699002400303

DO - 10.1177/002246699002400303

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 283

EP - 295

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -