Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS) Short Forms with Out-of-Home Care Youth

Thomas J. Gross, Kristin L Duppong Hurley, Matthew C Lambert, Michael H Epstein, Amy L. Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a need for brief progress monitoring measures of behavioral and emotional symptoms for youth in out-of-home care. The Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS; Bickman et al. in Manual of the peabody treatment progress battery. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2010) is one measure that has clinician and youth short forms (SFSS-SFs); however, the psychometric soundness of the SFSS-SFs with youth in out-of-home care has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective was to determine if the psychometric characteristics of the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs are viable for use in out-of-home care programs. Methods: The participants included 143 youth receiving residential treatment and 52 direct care residential staff. The current study assessed internal consistency and alternate forms reliability for SFSS-SFs for youth in a residential care setting. Further, a binary classification test was completed to determine if the SFSS-SFs similarly classified youth as the SFSS full version for low- and elevated-severity. Results: The internal consistency for the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs was adequate (α = .75–.82) as was the parallel forms reliability (r = .85–.97). The sensitivity (0.80–0.95), specificity (0.88–0.97), and overall accuracy (0.89–0.93) for differentiating low and elevated symptom severity was acceptable. Conclusions: The clinician and youth SFSS-SFs have acceptable psychometrics and may be beneficial for progress monitoring; however, more research is needed to assess their sensitivity to change over time in out-of-home programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-249
Number of pages11
JournalChild and Youth Care Forum
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

home care
psychometrics
evaluation
monitoring
staff

Keywords

  • Behavioral and emotional assessment
  • Brief assessment
  • Out-of-home care
  • Progress monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS) Short Forms with Out-of-Home Care Youth. / Gross, Thomas J.; Duppong Hurley, Kristin L; Lambert, Matthew C; Epstein, Michael H; Stevens, Amy L.

In: Child and Youth Care Forum, Vol. 44, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 239-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43fbacbc261f4320a06aa094856bfa9a,
title = "Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS) Short Forms with Out-of-Home Care Youth",
abstract = "Background: There is a need for brief progress monitoring measures of behavioral and emotional symptoms for youth in out-of-home care. The Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS; Bickman et al. in Manual of the peabody treatment progress battery. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2010) is one measure that has clinician and youth short forms (SFSS-SFs); however, the psychometric soundness of the SFSS-SFs with youth in out-of-home care has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective was to determine if the psychometric characteristics of the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs are viable for use in out-of-home care programs. Methods: The participants included 143 youth receiving residential treatment and 52 direct care residential staff. The current study assessed internal consistency and alternate forms reliability for SFSS-SFs for youth in a residential care setting. Further, a binary classification test was completed to determine if the SFSS-SFs similarly classified youth as the SFSS full version for low- and elevated-severity. Results: The internal consistency for the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs was adequate (α = .75–.82) as was the parallel forms reliability (r = .85–.97). The sensitivity (0.80–0.95), specificity (0.88–0.97), and overall accuracy (0.89–0.93) for differentiating low and elevated symptom severity was acceptable. Conclusions: The clinician and youth SFSS-SFs have acceptable psychometrics and may be beneficial for progress monitoring; however, more research is needed to assess their sensitivity to change over time in out-of-home programs.",
keywords = "Behavioral and emotional assessment, Brief assessment, Out-of-home care, Progress monitoring",
author = "Gross, {Thomas J.} and {Duppong Hurley}, {Kristin L} and Lambert, {Matthew C} and Epstein, {Michael H} and Stevens, {Amy L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10566-014-9280-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "239--249",
journal = "Child and Youth Care Forum",
issn = "1053-1890",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS) Short Forms with Out-of-Home Care Youth

AU - Gross, Thomas J.

AU - Duppong Hurley, Kristin L

AU - Lambert, Matthew C

AU - Epstein, Michael H

AU - Stevens, Amy L.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: There is a need for brief progress monitoring measures of behavioral and emotional symptoms for youth in out-of-home care. The Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS; Bickman et al. in Manual of the peabody treatment progress battery. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2010) is one measure that has clinician and youth short forms (SFSS-SFs); however, the psychometric soundness of the SFSS-SFs with youth in out-of-home care has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective was to determine if the psychometric characteristics of the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs are viable for use in out-of-home care programs. Methods: The participants included 143 youth receiving residential treatment and 52 direct care residential staff. The current study assessed internal consistency and alternate forms reliability for SFSS-SFs for youth in a residential care setting. Further, a binary classification test was completed to determine if the SFSS-SFs similarly classified youth as the SFSS full version for low- and elevated-severity. Results: The internal consistency for the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs was adequate (α = .75–.82) as was the parallel forms reliability (r = .85–.97). The sensitivity (0.80–0.95), specificity (0.88–0.97), and overall accuracy (0.89–0.93) for differentiating low and elevated symptom severity was acceptable. Conclusions: The clinician and youth SFSS-SFs have acceptable psychometrics and may be beneficial for progress monitoring; however, more research is needed to assess their sensitivity to change over time in out-of-home programs.

AB - Background: There is a need for brief progress monitoring measures of behavioral and emotional symptoms for youth in out-of-home care. The Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS; Bickman et al. in Manual of the peabody treatment progress battery. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2010) is one measure that has clinician and youth short forms (SFSS-SFs); however, the psychometric soundness of the SFSS-SFs with youth in out-of-home care has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective was to determine if the psychometric characteristics of the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs are viable for use in out-of-home care programs. Methods: The participants included 143 youth receiving residential treatment and 52 direct care residential staff. The current study assessed internal consistency and alternate forms reliability for SFSS-SFs for youth in a residential care setting. Further, a binary classification test was completed to determine if the SFSS-SFs similarly classified youth as the SFSS full version for low- and elevated-severity. Results: The internal consistency for the clinician and youth SFSS-SFs was adequate (α = .75–.82) as was the parallel forms reliability (r = .85–.97). The sensitivity (0.80–0.95), specificity (0.88–0.97), and overall accuracy (0.89–0.93) for differentiating low and elevated symptom severity was acceptable. Conclusions: The clinician and youth SFSS-SFs have acceptable psychometrics and may be beneficial for progress monitoring; however, more research is needed to assess their sensitivity to change over time in out-of-home programs.

KW - Behavioral and emotional assessment

KW - Brief assessment

KW - Out-of-home care

KW - Progress monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925463531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925463531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10566-014-9280-z

DO - 10.1007/s10566-014-9280-z

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 239

EP - 249

JO - Child and Youth Care Forum

JF - Child and Youth Care Forum

SN - 1053-1890

IS - 2

ER -