Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm

Richard L. Wiener, Barbara A. Watts, Dennis P. Stolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to further recent work in the psychology of jurisprudence. After summarizing the value positions that are central to a jurisprudence that emphasizes the role of law in the everyday lives of individuals, we examine the interaction between the tenets of that philosophy and the paradigmatic content of psycholegal research. We propose that one dominant perspective, information processing, assumes that legal actors are imperfect processors of social information and proceeds to document biases and propose ways for the law to minimize shortcomings in human cognition. After summarizing the emerging theory of psychological jurisprudence, we discuss the information processing paradigm in psychology and law, illustrating its contributions with three recent studies. Next, we present an empirical analysis of abstracts from the last 5 years of empirical research to demonstrate that there is a representative body of information processing research in psychology and law. Following this is an in‐depth assessment of a sample of cognitive and social cognitive studies, detailing the scientific and normative issues that make up this literature. Finally, we conclude with some recommendations for jurisprudential theorists and psycholegal researchers which will integrate the philosophy of psychology and law with its empirical underpinnings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-96
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral sciences & the law
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
Automatic Data Processing
jurisprudence
information processing
Psychology
paradigm
psychology
Law
Psychological Theory
Empirical Research
Research
Cognition
Research Personnel
everyday life
empirical research
cognition
trend
interaction
Values
philosophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm. / Wiener, Richard L.; Watts, Barbara A.; Stolle, Dennis P.

In: Behavioral sciences & the law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.1993, p. 79-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiener, Richard L. ; Watts, Barbara A. ; Stolle, Dennis P. / Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm. In: Behavioral sciences & the law. 1993 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 79-96.
@article{2f8ff51332204fee99a6c1fe1ef37862,
title = "Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to further recent work in the psychology of jurisprudence. After summarizing the value positions that are central to a jurisprudence that emphasizes the role of law in the everyday lives of individuals, we examine the interaction between the tenets of that philosophy and the paradigmatic content of psycholegal research. We propose that one dominant perspective, information processing, assumes that legal actors are imperfect processors of social information and proceeds to document biases and propose ways for the law to minimize shortcomings in human cognition. After summarizing the emerging theory of psychological jurisprudence, we discuss the information processing paradigm in psychology and law, illustrating its contributions with three recent studies. Next, we present an empirical analysis of abstracts from the last 5 years of empirical research to demonstrate that there is a representative body of information processing research in psychology and law. Following this is an in‐depth assessment of a sample of cognitive and social cognitive studies, detailing the scientific and normative issues that make up this literature. Finally, we conclude with some recommendations for jurisprudential theorists and psycholegal researchers which will integrate the philosophy of psychology and law with its empirical underpinnings.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Watts, {Barbara A.} and Stolle, {Dennis P.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.2370110107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "79--96",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Watts, Barbara A.

AU - Stolle, Dennis P.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this article is to further recent work in the psychology of jurisprudence. After summarizing the value positions that are central to a jurisprudence that emphasizes the role of law in the everyday lives of individuals, we examine the interaction between the tenets of that philosophy and the paradigmatic content of psycholegal research. We propose that one dominant perspective, information processing, assumes that legal actors are imperfect processors of social information and proceeds to document biases and propose ways for the law to minimize shortcomings in human cognition. After summarizing the emerging theory of psychological jurisprudence, we discuss the information processing paradigm in psychology and law, illustrating its contributions with three recent studies. Next, we present an empirical analysis of abstracts from the last 5 years of empirical research to demonstrate that there is a representative body of information processing research in psychology and law. Following this is an in‐depth assessment of a sample of cognitive and social cognitive studies, detailing the scientific and normative issues that make up this literature. Finally, we conclude with some recommendations for jurisprudential theorists and psycholegal researchers which will integrate the philosophy of psychology and law with its empirical underpinnings.

AB - The purpose of this article is to further recent work in the psychology of jurisprudence. After summarizing the value positions that are central to a jurisprudence that emphasizes the role of law in the everyday lives of individuals, we examine the interaction between the tenets of that philosophy and the paradigmatic content of psycholegal research. We propose that one dominant perspective, information processing, assumes that legal actors are imperfect processors of social information and proceeds to document biases and propose ways for the law to minimize shortcomings in human cognition. After summarizing the emerging theory of psychological jurisprudence, we discuss the information processing paradigm in psychology and law, illustrating its contributions with three recent studies. Next, we present an empirical analysis of abstracts from the last 5 years of empirical research to demonstrate that there is a representative body of information processing research in psychology and law. Following this is an in‐depth assessment of a sample of cognitive and social cognitive studies, detailing the scientific and normative issues that make up this literature. Finally, we conclude with some recommendations for jurisprudential theorists and psycholegal researchers which will integrate the philosophy of psychology and law with its empirical underpinnings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027535276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027535276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2370110107

DO - 10.1002/bsl.2370110107

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027535276

VL - 11

SP - 79

EP - 96

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 1

ER -