Abstract
Despite the strengths of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) in community mental health settings, there are a number of barriers to effective implementation of ROM, including measurement error due to provider factors (e.g., training level) and non-target client factors (i.e., client characteristics which have no meaningful relationship to the outcome of interest). In this study, ROM data from 80 client-provider dyads were examined for sources of variance due to provider factors and non-target client factors. Results indicated that provider factors and non-target client factors accounted for between 9.6 and 54% of the variance in the ROM measures. Our findings supported past research that provider characteristics impact ROM, and added the novel finding that client gender, age, diagnosis, and cognition also impact ROM. Methods to increase accuracy and utility of ROM in community mental health are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 780-789 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Community mental health
- Measurement
- Routine outcome monitoring
- Serious mental illness
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Phychiatric Mental Health
- Health Policy
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Cite this
Provider-Associated Measurement Error in Routine Outcome Monitoring in Community Mental Health. / Treichler, Emily B.H.; Spaulding, William D.
In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 780-789.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider-Associated Measurement Error in Routine Outcome Monitoring in Community Mental Health
AU - Treichler, Emily B.H.
AU - Spaulding, William D.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Despite the strengths of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) in community mental health settings, there are a number of barriers to effective implementation of ROM, including measurement error due to provider factors (e.g., training level) and non-target client factors (i.e., client characteristics which have no meaningful relationship to the outcome of interest). In this study, ROM data from 80 client-provider dyads were examined for sources of variance due to provider factors and non-target client factors. Results indicated that provider factors and non-target client factors accounted for between 9.6 and 54% of the variance in the ROM measures. Our findings supported past research that provider characteristics impact ROM, and added the novel finding that client gender, age, diagnosis, and cognition also impact ROM. Methods to increase accuracy and utility of ROM in community mental health are discussed.
AB - Despite the strengths of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) in community mental health settings, there are a number of barriers to effective implementation of ROM, including measurement error due to provider factors (e.g., training level) and non-target client factors (i.e., client characteristics which have no meaningful relationship to the outcome of interest). In this study, ROM data from 80 client-provider dyads were examined for sources of variance due to provider factors and non-target client factors. Results indicated that provider factors and non-target client factors accounted for between 9.6 and 54% of the variance in the ROM measures. Our findings supported past research that provider characteristics impact ROM, and added the novel finding that client gender, age, diagnosis, and cognition also impact ROM. Methods to increase accuracy and utility of ROM in community mental health are discussed.
KW - Community mental health
KW - Measurement
KW - Routine outcome monitoring
KW - Serious mental illness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044061257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044061257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10488-018-0861-2
DO - 10.1007/s10488-018-0861-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 29550889
AN - SCOPUS:85044061257
VL - 45
SP - 780
EP - 789
JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
SN - 0894-587X
IS - 5
ER -