Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial: Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care

Christie A. Befort, Jeffrey J. VanWormer, Cyrus V Desouza, Edward F. Ellerbeck, Kim S. Kimminau, Allen Greiner, Byron Gajewski, Terry Huang, Michael G. Perri, Tera L. Fazzino, Danielle Christifano, Leslie Eiland, Andjela T Drincic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obesity disproportionately affects rural residents in the United States, and primary care has the potential to fill a major gap in the provision of weight management services for rural communities. The objective of this cluster-randomized pragmatic trial is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three obesity treatment models in rural primary care: the Intensive Behavior Therapy fee-for-service (FFS) model reimbursed by Medicare, a team-based model that recognizes the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) as a preferred delivery approach, and the centralized disease management (DM) model, in which phone-based counseling is provided outside of the primary care practice. We hypothesize that the PCMH and DM treatments will be more effective than FFS in reducing weight at 24 months. Thirty-six practices from the rural Midwestern U.S. are randomized to deliver one of the three interventions to 40 patients (N = 1440) age 20 to 75 with a BMI 30-45 kg/m2. In the FFS arm, primary care providers and their personnel counsel patients to follow evidence-based weight loss guidelines using the Medicare-designated treatment schedule. In the PCMH arm, patients receive a comprehensive weight management intervention delivered locally by practice personnel using a combination of in-person and phone-based group sessions. In the DM arm, the same intervention is delivered remotely by obesity treatment specialists via group conference calls. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Additional measures include fasting glucose, lipids, quality of life indicators, and implementation process measures. Findings will illuminate effective obesity treatment intervention(s) in rural primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-314
Number of pages11
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Weight Loss
Primary Health Care
Obesity
Fee-for-Service Plans
Patient-Centered Care
Disease Management
Medicare
Weights and Measures
Therapeutics
Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Behavior Therapy
Rural Population
Counseling
Fasting
Appointments and Schedules
Quality of Life
Guidelines
Lipids
Glucose

Keywords

  • Behavioral weight loss
  • Lifestyle intervention
  • Obesity
  • Primary care
  • Rural

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial : Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care. / Befort, Christie A.; VanWormer, Jeffrey J.; Desouza, Cyrus V; Ellerbeck, Edward F.; Kimminau, Kim S.; Greiner, Allen; Gajewski, Byron; Huang, Terry; Perri, Michael G.; Fazzino, Tera L.; Christifano, Danielle; Eiland, Leslie; Drincic, Andjela T.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 47, 01.03.2016, p. 304-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Befort, CA, VanWormer, JJ, Desouza, CV, Ellerbeck, EF, Kimminau, KS, Greiner, A, Gajewski, B, Huang, T, Perri, MG, Fazzino, TL, Christifano, D, Eiland, L & Drincic, AT 2016, 'Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial: Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care', Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 47, pp. 304-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.006
Befort, Christie A. ; VanWormer, Jeffrey J. ; Desouza, Cyrus V ; Ellerbeck, Edward F. ; Kimminau, Kim S. ; Greiner, Allen ; Gajewski, Byron ; Huang, Terry ; Perri, Michael G. ; Fazzino, Tera L. ; Christifano, Danielle ; Eiland, Leslie ; Drincic, Andjela T. / Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial : Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care. In: Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2016 ; Vol. 47. pp. 304-314.
@article{ad1cfdf1c50c489297535526e3928421,
title = "Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial: Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care",
abstract = "Obesity disproportionately affects rural residents in the United States, and primary care has the potential to fill a major gap in the provision of weight management services for rural communities. The objective of this cluster-randomized pragmatic trial is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three obesity treatment models in rural primary care: the Intensive Behavior Therapy fee-for-service (FFS) model reimbursed by Medicare, a team-based model that recognizes the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) as a preferred delivery approach, and the centralized disease management (DM) model, in which phone-based counseling is provided outside of the primary care practice. We hypothesize that the PCMH and DM treatments will be more effective than FFS in reducing weight at 24 months. Thirty-six practices from the rural Midwestern U.S. are randomized to deliver one of the three interventions to 40 patients (N = 1440) age 20 to 75 with a BMI 30-45 kg/m2. In the FFS arm, primary care providers and their personnel counsel patients to follow evidence-based weight loss guidelines using the Medicare-designated treatment schedule. In the PCMH arm, patients receive a comprehensive weight management intervention delivered locally by practice personnel using a combination of in-person and phone-based group sessions. In the DM arm, the same intervention is delivered remotely by obesity treatment specialists via group conference calls. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Additional measures include fasting glucose, lipids, quality of life indicators, and implementation process measures. Findings will illuminate effective obesity treatment intervention(s) in rural primary care.",
keywords = "Behavioral weight loss, Lifestyle intervention, Obesity, Primary care, Rural",
author = "Befort, {Christie A.} and VanWormer, {Jeffrey J.} and Desouza, {Cyrus V} and Ellerbeck, {Edward F.} and Kimminau, {Kim S.} and Allen Greiner and Byron Gajewski and Terry Huang and Perri, {Michael G.} and Fazzino, {Tera L.} and Danielle Christifano and Leslie Eiland and Drincic, {Andjela T}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "304--314",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protocol for the Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction (RE-POWER) Trial

T2 - Comparing three obesity treatment models in rural primary care

AU - Befort, Christie A.

AU - VanWormer, Jeffrey J.

AU - Desouza, Cyrus V

AU - Ellerbeck, Edward F.

AU - Kimminau, Kim S.

AU - Greiner, Allen

AU - Gajewski, Byron

AU - Huang, Terry

AU - Perri, Michael G.

AU - Fazzino, Tera L.

AU - Christifano, Danielle

AU - Eiland, Leslie

AU - Drincic, Andjela T

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Obesity disproportionately affects rural residents in the United States, and primary care has the potential to fill a major gap in the provision of weight management services for rural communities. The objective of this cluster-randomized pragmatic trial is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three obesity treatment models in rural primary care: the Intensive Behavior Therapy fee-for-service (FFS) model reimbursed by Medicare, a team-based model that recognizes the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) as a preferred delivery approach, and the centralized disease management (DM) model, in which phone-based counseling is provided outside of the primary care practice. We hypothesize that the PCMH and DM treatments will be more effective than FFS in reducing weight at 24 months. Thirty-six practices from the rural Midwestern U.S. are randomized to deliver one of the three interventions to 40 patients (N = 1440) age 20 to 75 with a BMI 30-45 kg/m2. In the FFS arm, primary care providers and their personnel counsel patients to follow evidence-based weight loss guidelines using the Medicare-designated treatment schedule. In the PCMH arm, patients receive a comprehensive weight management intervention delivered locally by practice personnel using a combination of in-person and phone-based group sessions. In the DM arm, the same intervention is delivered remotely by obesity treatment specialists via group conference calls. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Additional measures include fasting glucose, lipids, quality of life indicators, and implementation process measures. Findings will illuminate effective obesity treatment intervention(s) in rural primary care.

AB - Obesity disproportionately affects rural residents in the United States, and primary care has the potential to fill a major gap in the provision of weight management services for rural communities. The objective of this cluster-randomized pragmatic trial is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three obesity treatment models in rural primary care: the Intensive Behavior Therapy fee-for-service (FFS) model reimbursed by Medicare, a team-based model that recognizes the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) as a preferred delivery approach, and the centralized disease management (DM) model, in which phone-based counseling is provided outside of the primary care practice. We hypothesize that the PCMH and DM treatments will be more effective than FFS in reducing weight at 24 months. Thirty-six practices from the rural Midwestern U.S. are randomized to deliver one of the three interventions to 40 patients (N = 1440) age 20 to 75 with a BMI 30-45 kg/m2. In the FFS arm, primary care providers and their personnel counsel patients to follow evidence-based weight loss guidelines using the Medicare-designated treatment schedule. In the PCMH arm, patients receive a comprehensive weight management intervention delivered locally by practice personnel using a combination of in-person and phone-based group sessions. In the DM arm, the same intervention is delivered remotely by obesity treatment specialists via group conference calls. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Additional measures include fasting glucose, lipids, quality of life indicators, and implementation process measures. Findings will illuminate effective obesity treatment intervention(s) in rural primary care.

KW - Behavioral weight loss

KW - Lifestyle intervention

KW - Obesity

KW - Primary care

KW - Rural

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959240000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959240000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26898748

AN - SCOPUS:84959240000

VL - 47

SP - 304

EP - 314

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

ER -