Protective window safety films: A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the most vulnerable component in the building envelope, fragmentation failure of glazing systems is among the leading cause of injury and death during terrorist and storm events. As a result, safety films have gained popularity as a cost-effective alternative to high-strength or laminated glass, especially for building retrofits. Various combinations of wet glazed films and mechanical attachment systems, including those satisfying ASTM F 1642 for glazing systems subject to airblast loadings, have been shown to meet windload and debris impact standards, including ASTM E 1996 standards adopted by the International Building Code (IBC). Defining these and other synergies that may exist between ASTM F -series security standards and more traditional ASTM standards that address natural hazards such as wind and seismic loading may be key in introducing anti-terrorism provisions to the commercial building industry. Such an "all-hazards" approach may compliment efforts underway to introduce meaningful terrorism resistant building standards into the IBC and minimize potential code duplication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-453
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of ASTM International
Volume2
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

Fingerprint

Hazards
Safety
Terrorism
Codes (standards)
Construction Industry
Debris
Glass
Cause of Death
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Costs
Industry

Keywords

  • ASTM E 1996
  • ASTM F 1233
  • ASTM F 1642
  • Airblast loading
  • Cyclic wind loading
  • Glazing systems
  • Impact resistance
  • International Building Code (IBC)
  • Uniform wind loading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Engineering(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Protective window safety films : A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards. / Grosskopf, K. R.

In: Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 2, No. 7, 01.07.2005, p. 445-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c65ded4624a49c79ea724f40e655087,
title = "Protective window safety films: A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards",
abstract = "As the most vulnerable component in the building envelope, fragmentation failure of glazing systems is among the leading cause of injury and death during terrorist and storm events. As a result, safety films have gained popularity as a cost-effective alternative to high-strength or laminated glass, especially for building retrofits. Various combinations of wet glazed films and mechanical attachment systems, including those satisfying ASTM F 1642 for glazing systems subject to airblast loadings, have been shown to meet windload and debris impact standards, including ASTM E 1996 standards adopted by the International Building Code (IBC). Defining these and other synergies that may exist between ASTM F -series security standards and more traditional ASTM standards that address natural hazards such as wind and seismic loading may be key in introducing anti-terrorism provisions to the commercial building industry. Such an {"}all-hazards{"} approach may compliment efforts underway to introduce meaningful terrorism resistant building standards into the IBC and minimize potential code duplication.",
keywords = "ASTM E 1996, ASTM F 1233, ASTM F 1642, Airblast loading, Cyclic wind loading, Glazing systems, Impact resistance, International Building Code (IBC), Uniform wind loading",
author = "Grosskopf, {K. R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "445--453",
journal = "Journal of ASTM International",
issn = "1546-962X",
publisher = "American Society for Testing and Materials",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protective window safety films

T2 - A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards

AU - Grosskopf, K. R.

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - As the most vulnerable component in the building envelope, fragmentation failure of glazing systems is among the leading cause of injury and death during terrorist and storm events. As a result, safety films have gained popularity as a cost-effective alternative to high-strength or laminated glass, especially for building retrofits. Various combinations of wet glazed films and mechanical attachment systems, including those satisfying ASTM F 1642 for glazing systems subject to airblast loadings, have been shown to meet windload and debris impact standards, including ASTM E 1996 standards adopted by the International Building Code (IBC). Defining these and other synergies that may exist between ASTM F -series security standards and more traditional ASTM standards that address natural hazards such as wind and seismic loading may be key in introducing anti-terrorism provisions to the commercial building industry. Such an "all-hazards" approach may compliment efforts underway to introduce meaningful terrorism resistant building standards into the IBC and minimize potential code duplication.

AB - As the most vulnerable component in the building envelope, fragmentation failure of glazing systems is among the leading cause of injury and death during terrorist and storm events. As a result, safety films have gained popularity as a cost-effective alternative to high-strength or laminated glass, especially for building retrofits. Various combinations of wet glazed films and mechanical attachment systems, including those satisfying ASTM F 1642 for glazing systems subject to airblast loadings, have been shown to meet windload and debris impact standards, including ASTM E 1996 standards adopted by the International Building Code (IBC). Defining these and other synergies that may exist between ASTM F -series security standards and more traditional ASTM standards that address natural hazards such as wind and seismic loading may be key in introducing anti-terrorism provisions to the commercial building industry. Such an "all-hazards" approach may compliment efforts underway to introduce meaningful terrorism resistant building standards into the IBC and minimize potential code duplication.

KW - ASTM E 1996

KW - ASTM F 1233

KW - ASTM F 1642

KW - Airblast loading

KW - Cyclic wind loading

KW - Glazing systems

KW - Impact resistance

KW - International Building Code (IBC)

KW - Uniform wind loading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30644463219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30644463219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:30644463219

VL - 2

SP - 445

EP - 453

JO - Journal of ASTM International

JF - Journal of ASTM International

SN - 1546-962X

IS - 7

ER -