Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study

Masayasu Ito, David B. Marx, Ansgar C. Cheng, Alvin G. Wee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of race, age, and gender on Commision Internationale de l'Eclairage Lab color space (CIELAB) values of attached gingival colors. The color coordinates of an optimal proposed attached gingival shade guide were also determined. Material and Methods: Participants (n = 120) were recruited to fulfill the following stratification of five age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-85, with four racial categories (white, black, Asian, and others) and balanced for gender. Reflectance measurements of participants' attached gingiva were made using a spectroradiometer and Xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out to identify gingival color contribution from race, age, and gender. A hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify color groups that clustered together. The coverage error of the proposed shade guide was calculated to the original gingival color. Results: The stepwise discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in gingival color contribution from the factors evaluated. Significant influence was found for the race/gender factors (p < 0.05), but not for age. The cluster analysis results revealed three cluster centroids with mean L*a*b* as follows: (1 = 51.0 ± 4.2, 27.7 ± 4.7, 18.3 ± 3.2), (2 = 61.4 ± 4.5, 24.3 ± 4.3, 17.6 ± 2.3), and (3 = 36.1 ± 4.1, 21 ± 4.9, 16 ± 5.2). The coverage errors to the following racial categories were: Asian (ΔE = 6.0 ± 4.8), black (ΔE = 6.7 ± 3.9), others (ΔE = 5.8 ± 2.9), and white (ΔE = 4.6 ± 2.7). Conclusions: The study showed that L*a*b* was significantly affected by race and gender. Clustering analysis was able to identify clusters in 120 participants for three gingival tones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-187
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Gingiva
Color
Cluster Analysis
Discriminant Analysis
Xenon
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Acrylic
  • Gingiva color
  • Pink porcelain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Ito, M., Marx, D. B., Cheng, A. C., & Wee, A. G. (2015). Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study. Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(3), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12195

Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study. / Ito, Masayasu; Marx, David B.; Cheng, Ansgar C.; Wee, Alvin G.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.04.2015, p. 182-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ito, M, Marx, DB, Cheng, AC & Wee, AG 2015, 'Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study', Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12195
Ito, Masayasu ; Marx, David B. ; Cheng, Ansgar C. ; Wee, Alvin G. / Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 182-187.
@article{9e7a6328aa394f7d90175d79e5ddcea8,
title = "Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of race, age, and gender on Commision Internationale de l'Eclairage Lab color space (CIELAB) values of attached gingival colors. The color coordinates of an optimal proposed attached gingival shade guide were also determined. Material and Methods: Participants (n = 120) were recruited to fulfill the following stratification of five age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-85, with four racial categories (white, black, Asian, and others) and balanced for gender. Reflectance measurements of participants' attached gingiva were made using a spectroradiometer and Xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out to identify gingival color contribution from race, age, and gender. A hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify color groups that clustered together. The coverage error of the proposed shade guide was calculated to the original gingival color. Results: The stepwise discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in gingival color contribution from the factors evaluated. Significant influence was found for the race/gender factors (p < 0.05), but not for age. The cluster analysis results revealed three cluster centroids with mean L*a*b* as follows: (1 = 51.0 ± 4.2, 27.7 ± 4.7, 18.3 ± 3.2), (2 = 61.4 ± 4.5, 24.3 ± 4.3, 17.6 ± 2.3), and (3 = 36.1 ± 4.1, 21 ± 4.9, 16 ± 5.2). The coverage errors to the following racial categories were: Asian (ΔE = 6.0 ± 4.8), black (ΔE = 6.7 ± 3.9), others (ΔE = 5.8 ± 2.9), and white (ΔE = 4.6 ± 2.7). Conclusions: The study showed that L*a*b* was significantly affected by race and gender. Clustering analysis was able to identify clusters in 120 participants for three gingival tones.",
keywords = "Acrylic, Gingiva color, Pink porcelain",
author = "Masayasu Ito and Marx, {David B.} and Cheng, {Ansgar C.} and Wee, {Alvin G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12195",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "182--187",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proposed shade guide for attached gingiva-A pilot study

AU - Ito, Masayasu

AU - Marx, David B.

AU - Cheng, Ansgar C.

AU - Wee, Alvin G.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of race, age, and gender on Commision Internationale de l'Eclairage Lab color space (CIELAB) values of attached gingival colors. The color coordinates of an optimal proposed attached gingival shade guide were also determined. Material and Methods: Participants (n = 120) were recruited to fulfill the following stratification of five age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-85, with four racial categories (white, black, Asian, and others) and balanced for gender. Reflectance measurements of participants' attached gingiva were made using a spectroradiometer and Xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out to identify gingival color contribution from race, age, and gender. A hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify color groups that clustered together. The coverage error of the proposed shade guide was calculated to the original gingival color. Results: The stepwise discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in gingival color contribution from the factors evaluated. Significant influence was found for the race/gender factors (p < 0.05), but not for age. The cluster analysis results revealed three cluster centroids with mean L*a*b* as follows: (1 = 51.0 ± 4.2, 27.7 ± 4.7, 18.3 ± 3.2), (2 = 61.4 ± 4.5, 24.3 ± 4.3, 17.6 ± 2.3), and (3 = 36.1 ± 4.1, 21 ± 4.9, 16 ± 5.2). The coverage errors to the following racial categories were: Asian (ΔE = 6.0 ± 4.8), black (ΔE = 6.7 ± 3.9), others (ΔE = 5.8 ± 2.9), and white (ΔE = 4.6 ± 2.7). Conclusions: The study showed that L*a*b* was significantly affected by race and gender. Clustering analysis was able to identify clusters in 120 participants for three gingival tones.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of race, age, and gender on Commision Internationale de l'Eclairage Lab color space (CIELAB) values of attached gingival colors. The color coordinates of an optimal proposed attached gingival shade guide were also determined. Material and Methods: Participants (n = 120) were recruited to fulfill the following stratification of five age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-85, with four racial categories (white, black, Asian, and others) and balanced for gender. Reflectance measurements of participants' attached gingiva were made using a spectroradiometer and Xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out to identify gingival color contribution from race, age, and gender. A hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify color groups that clustered together. The coverage error of the proposed shade guide was calculated to the original gingival color. Results: The stepwise discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in gingival color contribution from the factors evaluated. Significant influence was found for the race/gender factors (p < 0.05), but not for age. The cluster analysis results revealed three cluster centroids with mean L*a*b* as follows: (1 = 51.0 ± 4.2, 27.7 ± 4.7, 18.3 ± 3.2), (2 = 61.4 ± 4.5, 24.3 ± 4.3, 17.6 ± 2.3), and (3 = 36.1 ± 4.1, 21 ± 4.9, 16 ± 5.2). The coverage errors to the following racial categories were: Asian (ΔE = 6.0 ± 4.8), black (ΔE = 6.7 ± 3.9), others (ΔE = 5.8 ± 2.9), and white (ΔE = 4.6 ± 2.7). Conclusions: The study showed that L*a*b* was significantly affected by race and gender. Clustering analysis was able to identify clusters in 120 participants for three gingival tones.

KW - Acrylic

KW - Gingiva color

KW - Pink porcelain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927696595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927696595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12195

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12195

M3 - Article

C2 - 25081432

AN - SCOPUS:84927696595

VL - 24

SP - 182

EP - 187

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 3

ER -