Prompting deliberation about nanotechnology: Information, instruction, and discussion effects on individual engagement and knowledge

Lisa Marie Pytlik Zillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Alan J. Tomkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Deliberative (and educational) theories typically predict knowledge gains will be enhanced by information structure and discussion. In two studies, we experimentally manipulated key features of deliberative public engagement (information, instructions, and discussion) and measured impacts on cognitive-affective engagement and knowledge about nanotechnology. We also examined the direct and moderating impacts of individual differences in need for cognition and gender. Findings indicated little impact of information (organized by topic or by pro-con relevance). Instructions (prompts to think critically) decreased engagement in Study 1, and increased it in Study 2, but did not impact postknowledge. Group discussion had strong positive benefits for self-reported cognitive-affective engagement across studies. Also, for some types of engagement, effects were more positive for women than men. When predicting knowledge, there also was some evidence that discussion was more positive for women than men. Finally, need for cognition positively predicted engagement and knowledge gains, but rarely moderated the experimental effects. Given these mixed results, future research should continue to test theoretical assumptions about the effects of specific deliberative design features.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2
JournalJournal of Public Deliberation
Volume13
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
deliberation
instruction
cognition
educational theory
group discussion
gender
evidence

Keywords

  • Affective engagement
  • Cognitive engagement
  • Critical thinking
  • Deliberation prompts
  • Discussion
  • Gender differences
  • Information organization
  • Knowledge
  • Learning
  • Need for cognition
  • Public Deliberation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Prompting deliberation about nanotechnology : Information, instruction, and discussion effects on individual engagement and knowledge. / Pytlik Zillig, Lisa Marie; Hutchens, Myiah J.; Muhlberger, Peter; Tomkins, Alan J.

In: Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83fea8f63b75440bb97944ff5b2295eb,
title = "Prompting deliberation about nanotechnology: Information, instruction, and discussion effects on individual engagement and knowledge",
abstract = "Deliberative (and educational) theories typically predict knowledge gains will be enhanced by information structure and discussion. In two studies, we experimentally manipulated key features of deliberative public engagement (information, instructions, and discussion) and measured impacts on cognitive-affective engagement and knowledge about nanotechnology. We also examined the direct and moderating impacts of individual differences in need for cognition and gender. Findings indicated little impact of information (organized by topic or by pro-con relevance). Instructions (prompts to think critically) decreased engagement in Study 1, and increased it in Study 2, but did not impact postknowledge. Group discussion had strong positive benefits for self-reported cognitive-affective engagement across studies. Also, for some types of engagement, effects were more positive for women than men. When predicting knowledge, there also was some evidence that discussion was more positive for women than men. Finally, need for cognition positively predicted engagement and knowledge gains, but rarely moderated the experimental effects. Given these mixed results, future research should continue to test theoretical assumptions about the effects of specific deliberative design features.",
keywords = "Affective engagement, Cognitive engagement, Critical thinking, Deliberation prompts, Discussion, Gender differences, Information organization, Knowledge, Learning, Need for cognition, Public Deliberation",
author = "{Pytlik Zillig}, {Lisa Marie} and Hutchens, {Myiah J.} and Peter Muhlberger and Tomkins, {Alan J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Public Deliberation",
issn = "1937-2841",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prompting deliberation about nanotechnology

T2 - Information, instruction, and discussion effects on individual engagement and knowledge

AU - Pytlik Zillig, Lisa Marie

AU - Hutchens, Myiah J.

AU - Muhlberger, Peter

AU - Tomkins, Alan J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Deliberative (and educational) theories typically predict knowledge gains will be enhanced by information structure and discussion. In two studies, we experimentally manipulated key features of deliberative public engagement (information, instructions, and discussion) and measured impacts on cognitive-affective engagement and knowledge about nanotechnology. We also examined the direct and moderating impacts of individual differences in need for cognition and gender. Findings indicated little impact of information (organized by topic or by pro-con relevance). Instructions (prompts to think critically) decreased engagement in Study 1, and increased it in Study 2, but did not impact postknowledge. Group discussion had strong positive benefits for self-reported cognitive-affective engagement across studies. Also, for some types of engagement, effects were more positive for women than men. When predicting knowledge, there also was some evidence that discussion was more positive for women than men. Finally, need for cognition positively predicted engagement and knowledge gains, but rarely moderated the experimental effects. Given these mixed results, future research should continue to test theoretical assumptions about the effects of specific deliberative design features.

AB - Deliberative (and educational) theories typically predict knowledge gains will be enhanced by information structure and discussion. In two studies, we experimentally manipulated key features of deliberative public engagement (information, instructions, and discussion) and measured impacts on cognitive-affective engagement and knowledge about nanotechnology. We also examined the direct and moderating impacts of individual differences in need for cognition and gender. Findings indicated little impact of information (organized by topic or by pro-con relevance). Instructions (prompts to think critically) decreased engagement in Study 1, and increased it in Study 2, but did not impact postknowledge. Group discussion had strong positive benefits for self-reported cognitive-affective engagement across studies. Also, for some types of engagement, effects were more positive for women than men. When predicting knowledge, there also was some evidence that discussion was more positive for women than men. Finally, need for cognition positively predicted engagement and knowledge gains, but rarely moderated the experimental effects. Given these mixed results, future research should continue to test theoretical assumptions about the effects of specific deliberative design features.

KW - Affective engagement

KW - Cognitive engagement

KW - Critical thinking

KW - Deliberation prompts

KW - Discussion

KW - Gender differences

KW - Information organization

KW - Knowledge

KW - Learning

KW - Need for cognition

KW - Public Deliberation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042410386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042410386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042410386

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Public Deliberation

JF - Journal of Public Deliberation

SN - 1937-2841

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -