Producer concerns and perceptions regarding the effect of methane on cattle production and the environment

A survey of Nebraska producers

B. M. Boyd, A. Jones, Lisa D Franzen-Castle, K. Jenkins, R. Rasby, M. Luebbe, R. Stowell, Samodha C Fernando, G. E. Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Enteric methane production from cattle and its effect on climate change has been a topic of debate. Multiple studies have explored methods to reduce cattle enteric methane production while simultaneously improving performance. However, most strategies developed have not been widely implemented by cattle producers. Knowledge of producer concerns and perceptions on methane production from cattle and its effect on the environment may be limited. Therefore, the objectives of this survey were to determine what Nebraska producers know about methane production by cattle and how it affects performance and to determine whether different age groups, regions of Nebraska, and production size and type affects producer opinions on enteric methane production and climate change. The survey had a response rate of 22%. Regarding climate change, approximately 39% of producers disagreed, 33% were neutral, and 28% agreed they were concerned. However, producers in central and eastern Nebraska were closer to neutral than producers in western Nebraska (P <0.05). Younger producers perceived cattle to have a more positive effect on the environment and reported that they were more likely to adopt new management techniques that have been shown to improve animal performance than older producers (P <0.05). Most producers reported receiving production-related information from veterinarians (47.6%), followed by the "other" category (34.9%), the University of Nebraska (15.6%), and state and federal governments, which were the lowest (1.4 and 0.6%, respectively). In the last 3 yr, approximately 57% of producers attended one or fewer extension meetings, but 37% had not attended any extension meetings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-607
Number of pages7
JournalProfessional Animal Scientist
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

cattle production
Methane
methane
methane production
Climate Change
cattle
climate change
State Government
federal government
state government
Federal Government
Veterinarians
animal performance
veterinarians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Age Groups
methodology

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Climate change
  • Environment
  • Methane
  • Producer concerns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Food Science

Cite this

Producer concerns and perceptions regarding the effect of methane on cattle production and the environment : A survey of Nebraska producers. / Boyd, B. M.; Jones, A.; Franzen-Castle, Lisa D; Jenkins, K.; Rasby, R.; Luebbe, M.; Stowell, R.; Fernando, Samodha C; Erickson, G. E.

In: Professional Animal Scientist, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 601-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a675ac5188244fd99a95ae356f903e1b,
title = "Producer concerns and perceptions regarding the effect of methane on cattle production and the environment: A survey of Nebraska producers",
abstract = "Enteric methane production from cattle and its effect on climate change has been a topic of debate. Multiple studies have explored methods to reduce cattle enteric methane production while simultaneously improving performance. However, most strategies developed have not been widely implemented by cattle producers. Knowledge of producer concerns and perceptions on methane production from cattle and its effect on the environment may be limited. Therefore, the objectives of this survey were to determine what Nebraska producers know about methane production by cattle and how it affects performance and to determine whether different age groups, regions of Nebraska, and production size and type affects producer opinions on enteric methane production and climate change. The survey had a response rate of 22{\%}. Regarding climate change, approximately 39{\%} of producers disagreed, 33{\%} were neutral, and 28{\%} agreed they were concerned. However, producers in central and eastern Nebraska were closer to neutral than producers in western Nebraska (P <0.05). Younger producers perceived cattle to have a more positive effect on the environment and reported that they were more likely to adopt new management techniques that have been shown to improve animal performance than older producers (P <0.05). Most producers reported receiving production-related information from veterinarians (47.6{\%}), followed by the {"}other{"} category (34.9{\%}), the University of Nebraska (15.6{\%}), and state and federal governments, which were the lowest (1.4 and 0.6{\%}, respectively). In the last 3 yr, approximately 57{\%} of producers attended one or fewer extension meetings, but 37{\%} had not attended any extension meetings.",
keywords = "Cattle, Climate change, Environment, Methane, Producer concerns",
author = "Boyd, {B. M.} and A. Jones and Franzen-Castle, {Lisa D} and K. Jenkins and R. Rasby and M. Luebbe and R. Stowell and Fernando, {Samodha C} and Erickson, {G. E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15232/pas.2015-01425",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "601--607",
journal = "Applied Animal Science",
issn = "2590-2873",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Producer concerns and perceptions regarding the effect of methane on cattle production and the environment

T2 - A survey of Nebraska producers

AU - Boyd, B. M.

AU - Jones, A.

AU - Franzen-Castle, Lisa D

AU - Jenkins, K.

AU - Rasby, R.

AU - Luebbe, M.

AU - Stowell, R.

AU - Fernando, Samodha C

AU - Erickson, G. E.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Enteric methane production from cattle and its effect on climate change has been a topic of debate. Multiple studies have explored methods to reduce cattle enteric methane production while simultaneously improving performance. However, most strategies developed have not been widely implemented by cattle producers. Knowledge of producer concerns and perceptions on methane production from cattle and its effect on the environment may be limited. Therefore, the objectives of this survey were to determine what Nebraska producers know about methane production by cattle and how it affects performance and to determine whether different age groups, regions of Nebraska, and production size and type affects producer opinions on enteric methane production and climate change. The survey had a response rate of 22%. Regarding climate change, approximately 39% of producers disagreed, 33% were neutral, and 28% agreed they were concerned. However, producers in central and eastern Nebraska were closer to neutral than producers in western Nebraska (P <0.05). Younger producers perceived cattle to have a more positive effect on the environment and reported that they were more likely to adopt new management techniques that have been shown to improve animal performance than older producers (P <0.05). Most producers reported receiving production-related information from veterinarians (47.6%), followed by the "other" category (34.9%), the University of Nebraska (15.6%), and state and federal governments, which were the lowest (1.4 and 0.6%, respectively). In the last 3 yr, approximately 57% of producers attended one or fewer extension meetings, but 37% had not attended any extension meetings.

AB - Enteric methane production from cattle and its effect on climate change has been a topic of debate. Multiple studies have explored methods to reduce cattle enteric methane production while simultaneously improving performance. However, most strategies developed have not been widely implemented by cattle producers. Knowledge of producer concerns and perceptions on methane production from cattle and its effect on the environment may be limited. Therefore, the objectives of this survey were to determine what Nebraska producers know about methane production by cattle and how it affects performance and to determine whether different age groups, regions of Nebraska, and production size and type affects producer opinions on enteric methane production and climate change. The survey had a response rate of 22%. Regarding climate change, approximately 39% of producers disagreed, 33% were neutral, and 28% agreed they were concerned. However, producers in central and eastern Nebraska were closer to neutral than producers in western Nebraska (P <0.05). Younger producers perceived cattle to have a more positive effect on the environment and reported that they were more likely to adopt new management techniques that have been shown to improve animal performance than older producers (P <0.05). Most producers reported receiving production-related information from veterinarians (47.6%), followed by the "other" category (34.9%), the University of Nebraska (15.6%), and state and federal governments, which were the lowest (1.4 and 0.6%, respectively). In the last 3 yr, approximately 57% of producers attended one or fewer extension meetings, but 37% had not attended any extension meetings.

KW - Cattle

KW - Climate change

KW - Environment

KW - Methane

KW - Producer concerns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957102521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957102521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15232/pas.2015-01425

DO - 10.15232/pas.2015-01425

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 601

EP - 607

JO - Applied Animal Science

JF - Applied Animal Science

SN - 2590-2873

IS - 6

ER -