Processing of differentially valued rewards and punishments in youths with bipolar disorder or severe mood dysregulation

Geoff Rau, Karina S. Blair, Lisa Berghorst, Lisa Knopf, Martha Skup, David A. Luckenbaugh, Daniel S. Pine, Robert J. Blair, Ellen Leibenluft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Youths with chronic irritability and hyperarousal (i.e., severe mood dysregulation, SMD) have reward- and punishment-processing deficits distinct from those exhibited by children with episodic symptoms of mania (i.e., narrow-phenotype bipolar disorder, BD). Additionally, youths with SMD, like those with psychopathy, have prominent reactive aggression. Therefore, we hypothesized that SMD, but not BD, youths would be impaired on a decision-making task that has identified reward- and punishment-processing deficits in individuals with psychopathy. Methods: A decision-making task was used in which BD (n = 23), SMD (n = 37), and control subjects (n = 31) were asked to choose between two images associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Results: No between-group differences in task performance were found. Conclusion: These results suggest that BD, SMD, and normal youths do not differ in their ability to select between rewards and punishments of different value. Effect-size analyses suggest that this finding is not secondary to a type II error. Unlike individuals with psychopathy, neither SMD subjects nor those with BD differ from controls in their ability to select between differentially valued rewards and punishments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-196
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Punishment
Reward
Bipolar Disorder
Aptitude
Decision Making
Task Performance and Analysis
Aggression
Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Processing of differentially valued rewards and punishments in youths with bipolar disorder or severe mood dysregulation. / Rau, Geoff; Blair, Karina S.; Berghorst, Lisa; Knopf, Lisa; Skup, Martha; Luckenbaugh, David A.; Pine, Daniel S.; Blair, Robert J.; Leibenluft, Ellen.

In: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.04.2008, p. 185-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rau, Geoff ; Blair, Karina S. ; Berghorst, Lisa ; Knopf, Lisa ; Skup, Martha ; Luckenbaugh, David A. ; Pine, Daniel S. ; Blair, Robert J. ; Leibenluft, Ellen. / Processing of differentially valued rewards and punishments in youths with bipolar disorder or severe mood dysregulation. In: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 185-196.
@article{02b69693bd844de8b563618a6523810b,
title = "Processing of differentially valued rewards and punishments in youths with bipolar disorder or severe mood dysregulation",
abstract = "Background: Youths with chronic irritability and hyperarousal (i.e., severe mood dysregulation, SMD) have reward- and punishment-processing deficits distinct from those exhibited by children with episodic symptoms of mania (i.e., narrow-phenotype bipolar disorder, BD). Additionally, youths with SMD, like those with psychopathy, have prominent reactive aggression. Therefore, we hypothesized that SMD, but not BD, youths would be impaired on a decision-making task that has identified reward- and punishment-processing deficits in individuals with psychopathy. Methods: A decision-making task was used in which BD (n = 23), SMD (n = 37), and control subjects (n = 31) were asked to choose between two images associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Results: No between-group differences in task performance were found. Conclusion: These results suggest that BD, SMD, and normal youths do not differ in their ability to select between rewards and punishments of different value. Effect-size analyses suggest that this finding is not secondary to a type II error. Unlike individuals with psychopathy, neither SMD subjects nor those with BD differ from controls in their ability to select between differentially valued rewards and punishments.",
author = "Geoff Rau and Blair, {Karina S.} and Lisa Berghorst and Lisa Knopf and Martha Skup and Luckenbaugh, {David A.} and Pine, {Daniel S.} and Blair, {Robert J.} and Ellen Leibenluft",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/cap.2007.0053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "185--196",
journal = "Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology",
issn = "1044-5463",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing of differentially valued rewards and punishments in youths with bipolar disorder or severe mood dysregulation

AU - Rau, Geoff

AU - Blair, Karina S.

AU - Berghorst, Lisa

AU - Knopf, Lisa

AU - Skup, Martha

AU - Luckenbaugh, David A.

AU - Pine, Daniel S.

AU - Blair, Robert J.

AU - Leibenluft, Ellen

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Background: Youths with chronic irritability and hyperarousal (i.e., severe mood dysregulation, SMD) have reward- and punishment-processing deficits distinct from those exhibited by children with episodic symptoms of mania (i.e., narrow-phenotype bipolar disorder, BD). Additionally, youths with SMD, like those with psychopathy, have prominent reactive aggression. Therefore, we hypothesized that SMD, but not BD, youths would be impaired on a decision-making task that has identified reward- and punishment-processing deficits in individuals with psychopathy. Methods: A decision-making task was used in which BD (n = 23), SMD (n = 37), and control subjects (n = 31) were asked to choose between two images associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Results: No between-group differences in task performance were found. Conclusion: These results suggest that BD, SMD, and normal youths do not differ in their ability to select between rewards and punishments of different value. Effect-size analyses suggest that this finding is not secondary to a type II error. Unlike individuals with psychopathy, neither SMD subjects nor those with BD differ from controls in their ability to select between differentially valued rewards and punishments.

AB - Background: Youths with chronic irritability and hyperarousal (i.e., severe mood dysregulation, SMD) have reward- and punishment-processing deficits distinct from those exhibited by children with episodic symptoms of mania (i.e., narrow-phenotype bipolar disorder, BD). Additionally, youths with SMD, like those with psychopathy, have prominent reactive aggression. Therefore, we hypothesized that SMD, but not BD, youths would be impaired on a decision-making task that has identified reward- and punishment-processing deficits in individuals with psychopathy. Methods: A decision-making task was used in which BD (n = 23), SMD (n = 37), and control subjects (n = 31) were asked to choose between two images associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Results: No between-group differences in task performance were found. Conclusion: These results suggest that BD, SMD, and normal youths do not differ in their ability to select between rewards and punishments of different value. Effect-size analyses suggest that this finding is not secondary to a type II error. Unlike individuals with psychopathy, neither SMD subjects nor those with BD differ from controls in their ability to select between differentially valued rewards and punishments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42549130875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42549130875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/cap.2007.0053

DO - 10.1089/cap.2007.0053

M3 - Article

C2 - 18439115

AN - SCOPUS:42549130875

VL - 18

SP - 185

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

JF - Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

SN - 1044-5463

IS - 2

ER -