Private Versus Public Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Do Differences in Environmental Quality Exist?

Gaylene Styve Armstrong, Doris Layton MacKenzie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Expansion in the operation of private sector correctional facilities has sparked a number of debates. A primary concern is that environmental quality for offenders incarcerated in privately operated facilities will be poorer than publicly operated facilities due to the profit motivation of the private sector. This study examined data collected from 48 residential juvenile correctional facilities in 19 states (16 private and 32 public facilities). Self-report surveys, including cognitive assessments of 13 conditions of confinement, were administered to juvenile delinquents (N = 4,121) incarcerated in these facilities. Data from facility records were also incorporated in the analysis. A hierarchical linear model analysis of the juveniles' cognitive assessments indicated that no significant differences between private and public facilities in environmental quality existed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)542-563
Number of pages22
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Public Facilities
Private Sector
environmental quality
Self Report
public facility
Linear Models
private sector
model analysis
linear model
offender
profit
Surveys and Questionnaires
Private Facilities

Keywords

  • Conditions of confinement
  • Environmental quality
  • Private prisons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Private Versus Public Juvenile Correctional Facilities : Do Differences in Environmental Quality Exist? / Armstrong, Gaylene Styve; MacKenzie, Doris Layton.

In: Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.10.2003, p. 542-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3b330f8f284e40a38dcf7b9ee8fa40b7,
title = "Private Versus Public Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Do Differences in Environmental Quality Exist?",
abstract = "Expansion in the operation of private sector correctional facilities has sparked a number of debates. A primary concern is that environmental quality for offenders incarcerated in privately operated facilities will be poorer than publicly operated facilities due to the profit motivation of the private sector. This study examined data collected from 48 residential juvenile correctional facilities in 19 states (16 private and 32 public facilities). Self-report surveys, including cognitive assessments of 13 conditions of confinement, were administered to juvenile delinquents (N = 4,121) incarcerated in these facilities. Data from facility records were also incorporated in the analysis. A hierarchical linear model analysis of the juveniles' cognitive assessments indicated that no significant differences between private and public facilities in environmental quality existed.",
keywords = "Conditions of confinement, Environmental quality, Private prisons",
author = "Armstrong, {Gaylene Styve} and MacKenzie, {Doris Layton}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011128703252403",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "542--563",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Private Versus Public Juvenile Correctional Facilities

T2 - Do Differences in Environmental Quality Exist?

AU - Armstrong, Gaylene Styve

AU - MacKenzie, Doris Layton

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Expansion in the operation of private sector correctional facilities has sparked a number of debates. A primary concern is that environmental quality for offenders incarcerated in privately operated facilities will be poorer than publicly operated facilities due to the profit motivation of the private sector. This study examined data collected from 48 residential juvenile correctional facilities in 19 states (16 private and 32 public facilities). Self-report surveys, including cognitive assessments of 13 conditions of confinement, were administered to juvenile delinquents (N = 4,121) incarcerated in these facilities. Data from facility records were also incorporated in the analysis. A hierarchical linear model analysis of the juveniles' cognitive assessments indicated that no significant differences between private and public facilities in environmental quality existed.

AB - Expansion in the operation of private sector correctional facilities has sparked a number of debates. A primary concern is that environmental quality for offenders incarcerated in privately operated facilities will be poorer than publicly operated facilities due to the profit motivation of the private sector. This study examined data collected from 48 residential juvenile correctional facilities in 19 states (16 private and 32 public facilities). Self-report surveys, including cognitive assessments of 13 conditions of confinement, were administered to juvenile delinquents (N = 4,121) incarcerated in these facilities. Data from facility records were also incorporated in the analysis. A hierarchical linear model analysis of the juveniles' cognitive assessments indicated that no significant differences between private and public facilities in environmental quality existed.

KW - Conditions of confinement

KW - Environmental quality

KW - Private prisons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141484472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141484472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011128703252403

DO - 10.1177/0011128703252403

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0141484472

VL - 49

SP - 542

EP - 563

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

IS - 4

ER -