Privacy, security and the national health information network: A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness

Kimberly A. Galt, Karen A. Paschal, Amy Abbott, Andjela Drincic, Mark V. Siracuse, James D. Bramble, Ann M. Rule

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This mixed methods multiple case study examines the knowledge, understanding, and awareness of 25 health board/facility oversight managers and 20 health professional association directors about privacy and security issues important to achieving health information exchange (HIE) in the state of Nebraska. Within case analyses revealed that health board/facility oversight managers were unaware of key elements of the federal agenda; their concerns about privacy encompassed broad definitions both of what constituted a "health record" and "regulations centeredness." Alternatively, health professional association leaders were keenly aware of national initiatives. Despite concerns about HIE, they supported information exchange believing that patient care quality and safety would improve. Cross-case analyses revealed a perceptual disconnect between board/facility oversight managers and professional association leaders; however, both favored HIE. Understanding state-level stakeholder perceptions helps us further understand our progress toward achieving the national health information interoperability goal. There is an ongoing need to assure adequate patient privacy protection. Licensure and facility boards at the state level are likely to have a major role in the assurance of patient protections through facility oversight and provider behavior. The need for these boards to take an active role in oversight of patient rights and protections is imminent. Similarly, professional associations are the major vehicles for post-graduate education of practicing health professionals. Their engagement is essential to maintaining health professions knowledge. States will need to understand and engage both of these key stakeholders to make substantial progress in moving the HIE agenda forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPatient Safety and Health Care Management
EditorsGrant Savage, Eric Ford
Pages165-189
Number of pages25
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2008

Publication series

NameAdvances in Health Care Management
Volume7
ISSN (Print)1474-8231

Fingerprint

Security Measures
Information Services
Privacy
Health
Health Facilities
Graduate Education
Health Occupations
Patient Rights
Licensure
Patient Safety
Patient Care
Health Information Exchange

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Galt, K. A., Paschal, K. A., Abbott, A., Drincic, A., Siracuse, M. V., Bramble, J. D., & Rule, A. M. (2008). Privacy, security and the national health information network: A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness. In G. Savage, & E. Ford (Eds.), Patient Safety and Health Care Management (pp. 165-189). (Advances in Health Care Management; Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0

Privacy, security and the national health information network : A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness. / Galt, Kimberly A.; Paschal, Karen A.; Abbott, Amy; Drincic, Andjela; Siracuse, Mark V.; Bramble, James D.; Rule, Ann M.

Patient Safety and Health Care Management. ed. / Grant Savage; Eric Ford. 2008. p. 165-189 (Advances in Health Care Management; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Galt, KA, Paschal, KA, Abbott, A, Drincic, A, Siracuse, MV, Bramble, JD & Rule, AM 2008, Privacy, security and the national health information network: A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness. in G Savage & E Ford (eds), Patient Safety and Health Care Management. Advances in Health Care Management, vol. 7, pp. 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0
Galt KA, Paschal KA, Abbott A, Drincic A, Siracuse MV, Bramble JD et al. Privacy, security and the national health information network: A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness. In Savage G, Ford E, editors, Patient Safety and Health Care Management. 2008. p. 165-189. (Advances in Health Care Management). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0
Galt, Kimberly A. ; Paschal, Karen A. ; Abbott, Amy ; Drincic, Andjela ; Siracuse, Mark V. ; Bramble, James D. ; Rule, Ann M. / Privacy, security and the national health information network : A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness. Patient Safety and Health Care Management. editor / Grant Savage ; Eric Ford. 2008. pp. 165-189 (Advances in Health Care Management).
@inbook{efa989aca7194b8f8ea45988382f1a08,
title = "Privacy, security and the national health information network: A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness",
abstract = "This mixed methods multiple case study examines the knowledge, understanding, and awareness of 25 health board/facility oversight managers and 20 health professional association directors about privacy and security issues important to achieving health information exchange (HIE) in the state of Nebraska. Within case analyses revealed that health board/facility oversight managers were unaware of key elements of the federal agenda; their concerns about privacy encompassed broad definitions both of what constituted a {"}health record{"} and {"}regulations centeredness.{"} Alternatively, health professional association leaders were keenly aware of national initiatives. Despite concerns about HIE, they supported information exchange believing that patient care quality and safety would improve. Cross-case analyses revealed a perceptual disconnect between board/facility oversight managers and professional association leaders; however, both favored HIE. Understanding state-level stakeholder perceptions helps us further understand our progress toward achieving the national health information interoperability goal. There is an ongoing need to assure adequate patient privacy protection. Licensure and facility boards at the state level are likely to have a major role in the assurance of patient protections through facility oversight and provider behavior. The need for these boards to take an active role in oversight of patient rights and protections is imminent. Similarly, professional associations are the major vehicles for post-graduate education of practicing health professionals. Their engagement is essential to maintaining health professions knowledge. States will need to understand and engage both of these key stakeholders to make substantial progress in moving the HIE agenda forward.",
author = "Galt, {Kimberly A.} and Paschal, {Karen A.} and Amy Abbott and Andjela Drincic and Siracuse, {Mark V.} and Bramble, {James D.} and Rule, {Ann M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781846639548",
series = "Advances in Health Care Management",
pages = "165--189",
editor = "Grant Savage and Eric Ford",
booktitle = "Patient Safety and Health Care Management",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Privacy, security and the national health information network

T2 - A mixed methods case study of state-level stakeholder awareness

AU - Galt, Kimberly A.

AU - Paschal, Karen A.

AU - Abbott, Amy

AU - Drincic, Andjela

AU - Siracuse, Mark V.

AU - Bramble, James D.

AU - Rule, Ann M.

PY - 2008/8/15

Y1 - 2008/8/15

N2 - This mixed methods multiple case study examines the knowledge, understanding, and awareness of 25 health board/facility oversight managers and 20 health professional association directors about privacy and security issues important to achieving health information exchange (HIE) in the state of Nebraska. Within case analyses revealed that health board/facility oversight managers were unaware of key elements of the federal agenda; their concerns about privacy encompassed broad definitions both of what constituted a "health record" and "regulations centeredness." Alternatively, health professional association leaders were keenly aware of national initiatives. Despite concerns about HIE, they supported information exchange believing that patient care quality and safety would improve. Cross-case analyses revealed a perceptual disconnect between board/facility oversight managers and professional association leaders; however, both favored HIE. Understanding state-level stakeholder perceptions helps us further understand our progress toward achieving the national health information interoperability goal. There is an ongoing need to assure adequate patient privacy protection. Licensure and facility boards at the state level are likely to have a major role in the assurance of patient protections through facility oversight and provider behavior. The need for these boards to take an active role in oversight of patient rights and protections is imminent. Similarly, professional associations are the major vehicles for post-graduate education of practicing health professionals. Their engagement is essential to maintaining health professions knowledge. States will need to understand and engage both of these key stakeholders to make substantial progress in moving the HIE agenda forward.

AB - This mixed methods multiple case study examines the knowledge, understanding, and awareness of 25 health board/facility oversight managers and 20 health professional association directors about privacy and security issues important to achieving health information exchange (HIE) in the state of Nebraska. Within case analyses revealed that health board/facility oversight managers were unaware of key elements of the federal agenda; their concerns about privacy encompassed broad definitions both of what constituted a "health record" and "regulations centeredness." Alternatively, health professional association leaders were keenly aware of national initiatives. Despite concerns about HIE, they supported information exchange believing that patient care quality and safety would improve. Cross-case analyses revealed a perceptual disconnect between board/facility oversight managers and professional association leaders; however, both favored HIE. Understanding state-level stakeholder perceptions helps us further understand our progress toward achieving the national health information interoperability goal. There is an ongoing need to assure adequate patient privacy protection. Licensure and facility boards at the state level are likely to have a major role in the assurance of patient protections through facility oversight and provider behavior. The need for these boards to take an active role in oversight of patient rights and protections is imminent. Similarly, professional associations are the major vehicles for post-graduate education of practicing health professionals. Their engagement is essential to maintaining health professions knowledge. States will need to understand and engage both of these key stakeholders to make substantial progress in moving the HIE agenda forward.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49149090779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49149090779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0

DO - 10.1016/S1474-8231(08)07008-0

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:49149090779

SN - 9781846639548

T3 - Advances in Health Care Management

SP - 165

EP - 189

BT - Patient Safety and Health Care Management

A2 - Savage, Grant

A2 - Ford, Eric

ER -