Pressure ulcers: Avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the national pressure ulcer advisory panel consensus conference

Joyce M. Black, Laura E. Edsberg, Mona M. Baharestani, Diane Langemo, Margaret Goldberg, Laurie McNichol, Janet Cuddigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although pressure ulcer (PrU) development is now generally considered an indicator for quality of care, questions and concerns about situations in which they are unavoidable remain. Considering the importance of this issue and the lack of available research data, in 2010 the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) hosted a multidisciplinary conference to establish consensus on whether there are individuals in whom pressure ulcer development may be unavoidable and whether a difference exists between end-of-life skin changes and pressure ulcers. Thirty-four stakeholder organizations from various disciplines were identified and invited to send a voting representative. Of those, 24 accepted the invitation. Before the conference, existing literature was identified and shared via a webinar. A NPUAP task force developed standardized consensus questions for items with none or limited evidence and an interactive protocol was used to develop consensus among conference delegates and attendees. Consensus was established to be 80% agreement among conference delegates. Unanimous consensus was achieved for the following statements: most PrUs are avoidable; not all PrUs are avoidable; there are situations that render PrU development unavoidable, including hemodynamic instability that is worsened with physical movement and inability to maintain nutrition and hydration status and the presence of an advanced directive prohibiting artificial nutrition/hydration; pressure redistribution surfaces cannot replace turning and repositioning; and if enough pressure was removed from the external body the skin cannot always survive. Consensus was not obtained on the practicality or standard of turning patients every 2 hours nor on concerns surrounding the use of medical devices vis-à-vis their potential to cause skin damage. Research is needed to examine these issues, refine preventive practices in challenging situations, and identify the limits of prevention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-37
Number of pages14
JournalOstomy Wound Management
Volume57
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Pressure Ulcer
Skin Ulcer
Pressure
Skin
Quality of Health Care
Advisory Committees
Politics
Nutritional Status
Research
Hemodynamics
Organizations
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • consensus conference
  • pressure ulcer
  • preventability
  • prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Nursing(all)
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Pressure ulcers : Avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the national pressure ulcer advisory panel consensus conference. / Black, Joyce M.; Edsberg, Laura E.; Baharestani, Mona M.; Langemo, Diane; Goldberg, Margaret; McNichol, Laurie; Cuddigan, Janet.

In: Ostomy Wound Management, Vol. 57, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 24-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Black, Joyce M. ; Edsberg, Laura E. ; Baharestani, Mona M. ; Langemo, Diane ; Goldberg, Margaret ; McNichol, Laurie ; Cuddigan, Janet. / Pressure ulcers : Avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the national pressure ulcer advisory panel consensus conference. In: Ostomy Wound Management. 2011 ; Vol. 57, No. 2. pp. 24-37.
@article{50eada5a4fc540159cae0be0626811c3,
title = "Pressure ulcers: Avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the national pressure ulcer advisory panel consensus conference",
abstract = "Although pressure ulcer (PrU) development is now generally considered an indicator for quality of care, questions and concerns about situations in which they are unavoidable remain. Considering the importance of this issue and the lack of available research data, in 2010 the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) hosted a multidisciplinary conference to establish consensus on whether there are individuals in whom pressure ulcer development may be unavoidable and whether a difference exists between end-of-life skin changes and pressure ulcers. Thirty-four stakeholder organizations from various disciplines were identified and invited to send a voting representative. Of those, 24 accepted the invitation. Before the conference, existing literature was identified and shared via a webinar. A NPUAP task force developed standardized consensus questions for items with none or limited evidence and an interactive protocol was used to develop consensus among conference delegates and attendees. Consensus was established to be 80{\%} agreement among conference delegates. Unanimous consensus was achieved for the following statements: most PrUs are avoidable; not all PrUs are avoidable; there are situations that render PrU development unavoidable, including hemodynamic instability that is worsened with physical movement and inability to maintain nutrition and hydration status and the presence of an advanced directive prohibiting artificial nutrition/hydration; pressure redistribution surfaces cannot replace turning and repositioning; and if enough pressure was removed from the external body the skin cannot always survive. Consensus was not obtained on the practicality or standard of turning patients every 2 hours nor on concerns surrounding the use of medical devices vis-{\`a}-vis their potential to cause skin damage. Research is needed to examine these issues, refine preventive practices in challenging situations, and identify the limits of prevention.",
keywords = "consensus conference, pressure ulcer, preventability, prevention",
author = "Black, {Joyce M.} and Edsberg, {Laura E.} and Baharestani, {Mona M.} and Diane Langemo and Margaret Goldberg and Laurie McNichol and Janet Cuddigan",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "24--37",
journal = "Wound management & prevention",
issn = "2640-5237",
publisher = "HMP Communications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pressure ulcers

T2 - Avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the national pressure ulcer advisory panel consensus conference

AU - Black, Joyce M.

AU - Edsberg, Laura E.

AU - Baharestani, Mona M.

AU - Langemo, Diane

AU - Goldberg, Margaret

AU - McNichol, Laurie

AU - Cuddigan, Janet

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Although pressure ulcer (PrU) development is now generally considered an indicator for quality of care, questions and concerns about situations in which they are unavoidable remain. Considering the importance of this issue and the lack of available research data, in 2010 the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) hosted a multidisciplinary conference to establish consensus on whether there are individuals in whom pressure ulcer development may be unavoidable and whether a difference exists between end-of-life skin changes and pressure ulcers. Thirty-four stakeholder organizations from various disciplines were identified and invited to send a voting representative. Of those, 24 accepted the invitation. Before the conference, existing literature was identified and shared via a webinar. A NPUAP task force developed standardized consensus questions for items with none or limited evidence and an interactive protocol was used to develop consensus among conference delegates and attendees. Consensus was established to be 80% agreement among conference delegates. Unanimous consensus was achieved for the following statements: most PrUs are avoidable; not all PrUs are avoidable; there are situations that render PrU development unavoidable, including hemodynamic instability that is worsened with physical movement and inability to maintain nutrition and hydration status and the presence of an advanced directive prohibiting artificial nutrition/hydration; pressure redistribution surfaces cannot replace turning and repositioning; and if enough pressure was removed from the external body the skin cannot always survive. Consensus was not obtained on the practicality or standard of turning patients every 2 hours nor on concerns surrounding the use of medical devices vis-à-vis their potential to cause skin damage. Research is needed to examine these issues, refine preventive practices in challenging situations, and identify the limits of prevention.

AB - Although pressure ulcer (PrU) development is now generally considered an indicator for quality of care, questions and concerns about situations in which they are unavoidable remain. Considering the importance of this issue and the lack of available research data, in 2010 the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) hosted a multidisciplinary conference to establish consensus on whether there are individuals in whom pressure ulcer development may be unavoidable and whether a difference exists between end-of-life skin changes and pressure ulcers. Thirty-four stakeholder organizations from various disciplines were identified and invited to send a voting representative. Of those, 24 accepted the invitation. Before the conference, existing literature was identified and shared via a webinar. A NPUAP task force developed standardized consensus questions for items with none or limited evidence and an interactive protocol was used to develop consensus among conference delegates and attendees. Consensus was established to be 80% agreement among conference delegates. Unanimous consensus was achieved for the following statements: most PrUs are avoidable; not all PrUs are avoidable; there are situations that render PrU development unavoidable, including hemodynamic instability that is worsened with physical movement and inability to maintain nutrition and hydration status and the presence of an advanced directive prohibiting artificial nutrition/hydration; pressure redistribution surfaces cannot replace turning and repositioning; and if enough pressure was removed from the external body the skin cannot always survive. Consensus was not obtained on the practicality or standard of turning patients every 2 hours nor on concerns surrounding the use of medical devices vis-à-vis their potential to cause skin damage. Research is needed to examine these issues, refine preventive practices in challenging situations, and identify the limits of prevention.

KW - consensus conference

KW - pressure ulcer

KW - preventability

KW - prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952120274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952120274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21350270

AN - SCOPUS:79952120274

VL - 57

SP - 24

EP - 37

JO - Wound management & prevention

JF - Wound management & prevention

SN - 2640-5237

IS - 2

ER -