Preliminary evaluation of a visual analog function scale for use in rheumatoid arthritis

Frederick Wolfe, Kaleb Michaud, Theodore Pincus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Key outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are evaluated with multi-item ratings scales such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analog scales (VAS) such as pain and patient and physician global. As VAS scales are easy to use and particularly effective in research and patient care, we studied the characteristics, association, and psychometric properties of a VAS function scale (VAS-F) to determine if it could be used in RA studies and clinical practice. Methods. A total of 394 patients with RA completed the HAQ, the HAQ-II, and a VAS functional scale. In addition, they completed standard assessments of pain, global, fatigue, sleep problems, joint count, and the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary score (PCS) and vitality and total pain scores. Results. The HAQ-II was correlated with VAS-F at 0.76, but distributional characteristics of the HAQ and VAS-F differed, as the VAS-F scale results contained more higher scores as well as more lower scores compared with the HAQ-II and HAQ. Kendall's tau concordance analyses indicated that VAS scales were more concordant with other VAS than with non-VAS scales. Concordance of VAS-F was greatest with VAS global and was similar overall with VAS pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and quality of life. By contrast, the PCS, a multi-item scale, was more concordant with HAQ-II and HAQ. There was little to no difference between the VAS-F and the 2 HAQ with regard to concordance with the multi-item joint count, SF-36 vitality, and SF-36 total pain. Conclusion. The distribution differences between HAQ and HAQ-II and the VAS-F suggest that patients do not see minor limitations as problematic, but rate major limitations as being particularly limiting and worthy of high ratings. A VAS functional scale represents a patient-weighted functional assessment in which additional interpretation is given to the meaning of the limitations by the patient. VAS-F scales may be suitable for use in the clinic and in research. However, studies to assess sensitivity to change are required to determine the appropriate role of this scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1261-1266
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume32
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

Fingerprint

Visual Analog Scale
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Health
Pain Measurement
Pain
Fatigue
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sleep
Joints
Research
Psychometrics
Patient Care

Keywords

  • Functional assessment
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire-II
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Visual analog scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Preliminary evaluation of a visual analog function scale for use in rheumatoid arthritis. / Wolfe, Frederick; Michaud, Kaleb; Pincus, Theodore.

In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.07.2005, p. 1261-1266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d0aa5b110f544cbb3ff8b5ba7a781f5,
title = "Preliminary evaluation of a visual analog function scale for use in rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Objective. Key outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are evaluated with multi-item ratings scales such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analog scales (VAS) such as pain and patient and physician global. As VAS scales are easy to use and particularly effective in research and patient care, we studied the characteristics, association, and psychometric properties of a VAS function scale (VAS-F) to determine if it could be used in RA studies and clinical practice. Methods. A total of 394 patients with RA completed the HAQ, the HAQ-II, and a VAS functional scale. In addition, they completed standard assessments of pain, global, fatigue, sleep problems, joint count, and the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary score (PCS) and vitality and total pain scores. Results. The HAQ-II was correlated with VAS-F at 0.76, but distributional characteristics of the HAQ and VAS-F differed, as the VAS-F scale results contained more higher scores as well as more lower scores compared with the HAQ-II and HAQ. Kendall's tau concordance analyses indicated that VAS scales were more concordant with other VAS than with non-VAS scales. Concordance of VAS-F was greatest with VAS global and was similar overall with VAS pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and quality of life. By contrast, the PCS, a multi-item scale, was more concordant with HAQ-II and HAQ. There was little to no difference between the VAS-F and the 2 HAQ with regard to concordance with the multi-item joint count, SF-36 vitality, and SF-36 total pain. Conclusion. The distribution differences between HAQ and HAQ-II and the VAS-F suggest that patients do not see minor limitations as problematic, but rate major limitations as being particularly limiting and worthy of high ratings. A VAS functional scale represents a patient-weighted functional assessment in which additional interpretation is given to the meaning of the limitations by the patient. VAS-F scales may be suitable for use in the clinic and in research. However, studies to assess sensitivity to change are required to determine the appropriate role of this scale.",
keywords = "Functional assessment, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Health Assessment Questionnaire-II, Rheumatoid arthritis, Visual analog scale",
author = "Frederick Wolfe and Kaleb Michaud and Theodore Pincus",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1261--1266",
journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary evaluation of a visual analog function scale for use in rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Wolfe, Frederick

AU - Michaud, Kaleb

AU - Pincus, Theodore

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Objective. Key outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are evaluated with multi-item ratings scales such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analog scales (VAS) such as pain and patient and physician global. As VAS scales are easy to use and particularly effective in research and patient care, we studied the characteristics, association, and psychometric properties of a VAS function scale (VAS-F) to determine if it could be used in RA studies and clinical practice. Methods. A total of 394 patients with RA completed the HAQ, the HAQ-II, and a VAS functional scale. In addition, they completed standard assessments of pain, global, fatigue, sleep problems, joint count, and the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary score (PCS) and vitality and total pain scores. Results. The HAQ-II was correlated with VAS-F at 0.76, but distributional characteristics of the HAQ and VAS-F differed, as the VAS-F scale results contained more higher scores as well as more lower scores compared with the HAQ-II and HAQ. Kendall's tau concordance analyses indicated that VAS scales were more concordant with other VAS than with non-VAS scales. Concordance of VAS-F was greatest with VAS global and was similar overall with VAS pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and quality of life. By contrast, the PCS, a multi-item scale, was more concordant with HAQ-II and HAQ. There was little to no difference between the VAS-F and the 2 HAQ with regard to concordance with the multi-item joint count, SF-36 vitality, and SF-36 total pain. Conclusion. The distribution differences between HAQ and HAQ-II and the VAS-F suggest that patients do not see minor limitations as problematic, but rate major limitations as being particularly limiting and worthy of high ratings. A VAS functional scale represents a patient-weighted functional assessment in which additional interpretation is given to the meaning of the limitations by the patient. VAS-F scales may be suitable for use in the clinic and in research. However, studies to assess sensitivity to change are required to determine the appropriate role of this scale.

AB - Objective. Key outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are evaluated with multi-item ratings scales such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analog scales (VAS) such as pain and patient and physician global. As VAS scales are easy to use and particularly effective in research and patient care, we studied the characteristics, association, and psychometric properties of a VAS function scale (VAS-F) to determine if it could be used in RA studies and clinical practice. Methods. A total of 394 patients with RA completed the HAQ, the HAQ-II, and a VAS functional scale. In addition, they completed standard assessments of pain, global, fatigue, sleep problems, joint count, and the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary score (PCS) and vitality and total pain scores. Results. The HAQ-II was correlated with VAS-F at 0.76, but distributional characteristics of the HAQ and VAS-F differed, as the VAS-F scale results contained more higher scores as well as more lower scores compared with the HAQ-II and HAQ. Kendall's tau concordance analyses indicated that VAS scales were more concordant with other VAS than with non-VAS scales. Concordance of VAS-F was greatest with VAS global and was similar overall with VAS pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and quality of life. By contrast, the PCS, a multi-item scale, was more concordant with HAQ-II and HAQ. There was little to no difference between the VAS-F and the 2 HAQ with regard to concordance with the multi-item joint count, SF-36 vitality, and SF-36 total pain. Conclusion. The distribution differences between HAQ and HAQ-II and the VAS-F suggest that patients do not see minor limitations as problematic, but rate major limitations as being particularly limiting and worthy of high ratings. A VAS functional scale represents a patient-weighted functional assessment in which additional interpretation is given to the meaning of the limitations by the patient. VAS-F scales may be suitable for use in the clinic and in research. However, studies to assess sensitivity to change are required to determine the appropriate role of this scale.

KW - Functional assessment

KW - Health Assessment Questionnaire

KW - Health Assessment Questionnaire-II

KW - Rheumatoid arthritis

KW - Visual analog scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22244485004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22244485004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15996062

AN - SCOPUS:22244485004

VL - 32

SP - 1261

EP - 1266

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 7

ER -