Pregnancy, drug testing, and the fourth amendment: Legal and behavioral implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In its efforts to protect the health of unborn children, the government is increasingly attempting to regulate pregnant women's conduct. As with other policies affecting pregnant women's autonomy, these policies have constitutional overtones. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court struck down a South Carolina hospital's policy of testing pregnant women for cocaine and turning positive results over to law enforcement for prosecution. This article discusses the basis of the decision and its legal and behavioral implications. Although the decision came down on the side of pregnant women's rights, it left unresolved the issue of whether a similar policy could be constructed that would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes with a consideration of the likely effects of, and alternatives to, such a policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-228
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003

Fingerprint

Pregnant Women
Pregnancy
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Law Enforcement
Women's Rights
Cocaine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Pregnancy, drug testing, and the fourth amendment : Legal and behavioral implications. / Bornstein, Brian H.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.06.2003, p. 220-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{866a6b0dd3604c729e9657a6203a3004,
title = "Pregnancy, drug testing, and the fourth amendment: Legal and behavioral implications",
abstract = "In its efforts to protect the health of unborn children, the government is increasingly attempting to regulate pregnant women's conduct. As with other policies affecting pregnant women's autonomy, these policies have constitutional overtones. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court struck down a South Carolina hospital's policy of testing pregnant women for cocaine and turning positive results over to law enforcement for prosecution. This article discusses the basis of the decision and its legal and behavioral implications. Although the decision came down on the side of pregnant women's rights, it left unresolved the issue of whether a similar policy could be constructed that would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes with a consideration of the likely effects of, and alternatives to, such a policy.",
author = "Bornstein, {Brian H}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "220--228",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pregnancy, drug testing, and the fourth amendment

T2 - Legal and behavioral implications

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

N2 - In its efforts to protect the health of unborn children, the government is increasingly attempting to regulate pregnant women's conduct. As with other policies affecting pregnant women's autonomy, these policies have constitutional overtones. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court struck down a South Carolina hospital's policy of testing pregnant women for cocaine and turning positive results over to law enforcement for prosecution. This article discusses the basis of the decision and its legal and behavioral implications. Although the decision came down on the side of pregnant women's rights, it left unresolved the issue of whether a similar policy could be constructed that would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes with a consideration of the likely effects of, and alternatives to, such a policy.

AB - In its efforts to protect the health of unborn children, the government is increasingly attempting to regulate pregnant women's conduct. As with other policies affecting pregnant women's autonomy, these policies have constitutional overtones. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), the Supreme Court struck down a South Carolina hospital's policy of testing pregnant women for cocaine and turning positive results over to law enforcement for prosecution. This article discusses the basis of the decision and its legal and behavioral implications. Although the decision came down on the side of pregnant women's rights, it left unresolved the issue of whether a similar policy could be constructed that would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes with a consideration of the likely effects of, and alternatives to, such a policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037590602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037590602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.220

DO - 10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.220

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12828018

AN - SCOPUS:0037590602

VL - 17

SP - 220

EP - 228

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 2

ER -